Jump to content

Active protection system: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
(talk | contribs)
 
(26 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Type of military anti-projectile defense system}}
{{Short description|Type of military anti-projectile defense system}}
[[File: Arena system.svg|thumb|[[Arena (countermeasure)|Arena Active Protection System]]: <br/>
An '''active protection system'''(''APS''') is a system designed to actively prevent certain anti-tank weapons from destroying a vehicle.
1. Protective siloes <br/>
2. Radar <br/>
3. Protective ammo <br/>
4. Incoming anti-tank guided missile <br/>
5. Tracking phase|550x550px]]
An '''active protection system''' ('''APS''') is a system designed to actively prevent certain anti-tank weapons from destroying a vehicle.


Countermeasures that either conceal the vehicle from, or disrupt the guidance of an incoming [[guided missile]] threat are designated '''soft-kill''' active protection measures.
Countermeasures that either conceal the vehicle from, or disrupt the guidance of an incoming [[guided missile]] threat are designated '''soft-kill''' active protection measures.


Countermeasures that physically strike an incoming threat to damage or destroy it and thereby limit its ability to penetrate armor are designated '''hard-kill''' active protection measures.
Countermeasures that physically strike an incoming threat to damage or destroy it and thereby limit its ability to penetrate armor are designated '''hard-kill''' active protection measures.

==Soft-kill measures==
==Soft-kill measures==
Soft-kill measures are designed to defeat guided weapons either by concealing the protected vehicle from them (for example, with a [[smoke screen]]) or by disrupting their guidance with radiation (for example, with a [[Dazzler (weapon)|dazzler]]). Some systems use laser dazzlers to blind the operator or sensors of [[semi-automatic command to line of sight]] (SACLOS) [[anti-tank guided missiles]] (ATGMs), such as the JD-3 of the [[Type 99 tank]]. Others use powerful infrared emitters to mask the IR tracking flare present on many SACLOS ATGMs, such as the [[Shtora-1]].
Soft-kill measures are designed to defeat guided weapons either by concealing the protected vehicle from them (for example, with a [[smoke screen]]) or by disrupting their guidance with radiation (for example, with a [[Dazzler (weapon)|dazzler]]). Some systems use laser dazzlers to blind the operator or sensors of [[semi-automatic command to line of sight]] (SACLOS) [[anti-tank guided missiles]] (ATGMs), such as the JD-3 of the [[Type 99 tank]]. Others use powerful infrared emitters to mask the IR tracking flare present on many SACLOS ATGMs, such as the [[Shtora-1]].
Line 22: Line 27:


[[File:Merkava4m-Windbreaker-0036a.jpg|thumb|[[Merkava]] Mk IVm Windbreaker, fitted with [[Trophy (countermeasure)|Trophy]] APS]]
[[File:Merkava4m-Windbreaker-0036a.jpg|thumb|[[Merkava]] Mk IVm Windbreaker, fitted with [[Trophy (countermeasure)|Trophy]] APS]]
There are many examples of hard kill countermeasures. The Russian [[Arena (countermeasure)|Arena]] system utilizes a Doppler radar to detect incoming threats and fires munition to eliminate the threat. The Israeli [[Trophy (countermeasure)|Trophy]] system fires a multiple explosively formed penetrator (MEFP) to destroy the threat. An American system known as [[Quick Kill]] detects incoming threats using an [[Active Electronically Scanned Array]], which assesses the threat, and deploys a smaller rocket countermeasure. Another American system, known as [[Iron Curtain (countermeasure)|Iron Curtain]], utilizes two sensors to reduce false alarms and defeat threats inches from their target by firing a kinetic countermeasure designed to minimize collateral damage. The Russian [[Afganit]] active protection system of the [[Armata Universal Combat Platform|Armata]] AFVs features a millimeter-wavelength radar to detect and track incoming [[anti-tank warfare|anti-tank]] munitions. It can reportedly intercept [[armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot]] [[kinetic energy penetrator]]s in addition to [[high-explosive anti-tank]] (HEAT) munitions.<ref name=vpk>{{cite news|url=http://vpk.name/library/f/armata.html |title=Танк Т-14 "Армата" или Т-99 "Приоритет" |publisher=vpk.name |access-date=6 May 2015 |trans-title=Tank T-14 "Armata" or T-99 "priority" |language=ru}}</ref><ref name="fmso.leavenworth.army.mil">{{Cite web |url=http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/OEWatch/201503/201503.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2017-03-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518093100/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/OEWatch/201503/201503.pdf |archive-date=2015-05-18 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
There are many examples of hard kill countermeasures. The Russian [[Arena (countermeasure)|Arena]] system utilizes a [[Doppler radar]] to detect incoming threats and fires munition to eliminate the threat. The Israeli [[Trophy (countermeasure)|Trophy]] system fires a multiple explosively formed penetrator (MEFP) to destroy the threat. An American system known as [[Quick Kill]] detects incoming threats using an [[Active Electronically Scanned Array]], which assesses the threat, and deploys a smaller rocket countermeasure. Another American system, known as [[Iron Curtain (countermeasure)|Iron Curtain]], utilizes two sensors to reduce false alarms and defeat threats inches from their target by firing a kinetic countermeasure designed to minimize collateral damage. The Russian [[Afganit]] active protection system of the [[Armata Universal Combat Platform|Armata]] AFVs features a millimeter-wavelength radar to detect and track incoming [[anti-tank warfare|anti-tank]] munitions. It can reportedly intercept [[armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot]] [[kinetic energy penetrator]]s in addition to [[high-explosive anti-tank]] (HEAT) munitions.<ref name=vpk>{{cite news|url=http://vpk.name/library/f/armata.html |title=Танк Т-14 "Армата" или Т-99 "Приоритет" |publisher=vpk.name |access-date=6 May 2015 |trans-title=Tank T-14 "Armata" or T-99 "priority" |language=ru}}</ref><ref name="fmso.leavenworth.army.mil">{{Cite web |url=http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/OEWatch/201503/201503.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2017-03-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518093100/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/OEWatch/201503/201503.pdf |archive-date=2015-05-18 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


==Potential performance problems==
==Potential performance problems==
Line 32: Line 37:
The trajectories of [[top attack]] ATGMs like the [[FGM-148 Javelin]] (US) and [[Trigat]] (Germany) plunge down onto their targets. Not all active protection systems are designed to fire at the extreme elevations necessary to protect against such munitions. RPGs fired at a steep downward angle from elevated positions can pose a similar threat.
The trajectories of [[top attack]] ATGMs like the [[FGM-148 Javelin]] (US) and [[Trigat]] (Germany) plunge down onto their targets. Not all active protection systems are designed to fire at the extreme elevations necessary to protect against such munitions. RPGs fired at a steep downward angle from elevated positions can pose a similar threat.


==Examples of active protection systems (country of origin)==
==See also==
<!-- New links in alphabetical order please -->
<!-- New links in alphabetical order please -->
*[[Anti-aircraft]]
*[[Anti-ballistic missile]]
*[[Close-in weapon system]]
*[[Digital Radio Frequency Memory]]
*[[Electronic countermeasures]]
*[[Flare (countermeasure)]]
*[[Infrared countermeasures]]
*[[National Missile Defense]]
*[[Strategic Defense Initiative]]
*[[Sentry gun]]


===Examples of active protection systems (country of origin)===
<!-- New links in alphabetical order please -->
===Hard-kill measures===
===Hard-kill measures===
[[File:FCS Quick Kill.webm|thumb|right|American [[Quick Kill]] system takes out an RPG in a test October 2007]]
[[File:K-2 tank's active protection system.webm|thumb|thumbtime=0:38|A demonstration video clip of [[KAPS (countermeasure)|KAPS]]]]
* {{flag|China}}
* {{flag|China}}
** [[GL5 Active Protection System|GL5]]
** [[GL5 Active Protection System|GL5]]
* {{flag|France}}
** [[Thales DIAMANT|DIAMANT]]
* {{flag|Germany}}
* {{flag|Germany}}
** [[AMAP-ADS]]
** [[AMAP-ADS]]
Line 59: Line 56:
** [[Arena (countermeasure)|Arena]]
** [[Arena (countermeasure)|Arena]]
** [[Drozd]]
** [[Drozd]]
* {{flag|South Africa}} {{flag|Sweden}}
* {{flag|South Africa}} / {{flag|Sweden}}
** [[LEDS-150]]
** [[LEDS-150]]
* {{flag|South Korea}}
* {{flag|South Korea}}
** [[KAPS (countermeasure)|KAPS]]
** [[KAPS (countermeasure)|KAPS]]
* {{flag|Turkey}}
** [[AKKOR]]
** [[PULAT]]
* {{flag|United States}}
* {{flag|United States}}
** [[Iron Curtain (countermeasure)|Iron Curtain]]
** [[Iron Curtain (countermeasure)|Iron Curtain]]
Line 73: Line 67:


===Soft-kill measures===
===Soft-kill measures===
[[File:The multispectral screening smoke grenade launcher of the K2 Black Panther.png|thumb|K2 Black Panther's [[Multispectral imaging|multispectral]] screening smoke grenade launcher]]
* {{flag|Germany}}
* {{flag|Germany}}
** [[MUSS (countermeasure)|MUSS]]
** [[MUSS (countermeasure)|MUSS]]
* {{flag|Pakistan}}
** [[Varta (countermeasure)|Varta]]
* {{flag|Poland}}
* {{flag|Poland}}
**[[Obra-3]]
** [[Obra-3]]
* {{flag|Russia}}
* {{flag|Russia}}
** [[Shtora-1]]
** [[Shtora-1]]
* {{flag|Ukraine}}
** [[Guard (countermeasure)|Guard]]
* {{flag|South Korea}}
* {{flag|South Korea}}
** [[K2_Black_Panther#Active_protection_systems|MSSG]]
** [[K2_Black_Panther#Active_protection_systems|MSSG]]
Line 87: Line 82:
* {{flag|United States}}
* {{flag|United States}}
** [[AN/VLQ-6 MCD]]
** [[AN/VLQ-6 MCD]]

==See also==
<!-- New links in alphabetical order please -->
*[[Anti-aircraft]]
*[[Anti-ballistic missile]]
*[[B-52_Stratofortress#Overview|B-52]]/[[Convair_B-58_Hustler#Weapons_systems|B-58]] Turret
*[[Close-in weapon system]]
*[[Digital Radio Frequency Memory]]
*[[Electronic countermeasures]]
*[[Flare (countermeasure)]]
*[[Infrared countermeasures]]
*[[National Missile Defense]]
*[[Reactive armor]]
*[[Strategic Defense Initiative]]
*[[Sentry gun]]


==References==
==References==
Line 97: Line 107:
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20090310041758/http://www.defense-update.com/features/du-1-04/soft-kill-west.htm Soft Kill Active Protective Systems overview - Defense Update]
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20090310041758/http://www.defense-update.com/features/du-1-04/soft-kill-west.htm Soft Kill Active Protective Systems overview - Defense Update]


== Further reading ==
*{{cite report |last1= Feickert |first1=Andrew |date=30 August 2016 |title=Army and Marine Corps Active Protection System (APS) Efforts |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1015880.pdf |publisher=Congressional Budget Office |access-date= 20 September 2023}}
{{APS}}
{{APS}}



Latest revision as of 18:44, 28 December 2024

Arena Active Protection System:
1. Protective siloes
2. Radar
3. Protective ammo
4. Incoming anti-tank guided missile
5. Tracking phase

An active protection system (APS) is a system designed to actively prevent certain anti-tank weapons from destroying a vehicle.

Countermeasures that either conceal the vehicle from, or disrupt the guidance of an incoming guided missile threat are designated soft-kill active protection measures.

Countermeasures that physically strike an incoming threat to damage or destroy it and thereby limit its ability to penetrate armor are designated hard-kill active protection measures.

Soft-kill measures

[edit]

Soft-kill measures are designed to defeat guided weapons either by concealing the protected vehicle from them (for example, with a smoke screen) or by disrupting their guidance with radiation (for example, with a dazzler). Some systems use laser dazzlers to blind the operator or sensors of semi-automatic command to line of sight (SACLOS) anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs), such as the JD-3 of the Type 99 tank. Others use powerful infrared emitters to mask the IR tracking flare present on many SACLOS ATGMs, such as the Shtora-1.

Soft-kill measures can be divided into on-board countermeasures, such as dazzlers, which are fixed to the platform and expendable countermeasures, such as smoke grenades, which are ejected upon use.

Soft-kill measures may be used preemptively, but are more commonly employed in reaction to detected threats.

Hard-kill measures

[edit]

Hard-kill measures kinetically attack threatening missiles or other munitions, usually at very close range to the protected vehicle. Explosively formed penetrators (EFPs) or high explosive fragmentation countermeasures are typically used. The exact mechanism of many APSs has not been published. The action of these countermeasures may lead to:

  • disturbance of the stability of a kinetic energy penetrator which will decrease its penetration ability as the deflection angle increases.
  • premature initiation of a shaped charge (e.g., too great stand-off), but most likely improper initiation, thereby impeding optimum jet development of the metallic lining, usually copper, in the shaped charge. The copper jet provides most of the anti armor capabilities of shaped charge weapons.
  • destruction of the airframe of an inbound missile or shell.
Merkava Mk IVm Windbreaker, fitted with Trophy APS

There are many examples of hard kill countermeasures. The Russian Arena system utilizes a Doppler radar to detect incoming threats and fires munition to eliminate the threat. The Israeli Trophy system fires a multiple explosively formed penetrator (MEFP) to destroy the threat. An American system known as Quick Kill detects incoming threats using an Active Electronically Scanned Array, which assesses the threat, and deploys a smaller rocket countermeasure. Another American system, known as Iron Curtain, utilizes two sensors to reduce false alarms and defeat threats inches from their target by firing a kinetic countermeasure designed to minimize collateral damage. The Russian Afganit active protection system of the Armata AFVs features a millimeter-wavelength radar to detect and track incoming anti-tank munitions. It can reportedly intercept armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot kinetic energy penetrators in addition to high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) munitions.[1][2]

Potential performance problems

[edit]

Clutter

[edit]

Mountains and neighboring vehicles reflect radio waves, thus creating radar clutter, which adversely affects radar-detection and radar-lock performance.[citation needed]

Top attack munitions

[edit]

The trajectories of top attack ATGMs like the FGM-148 Javelin (US) and Trigat (Germany) plunge down onto their targets. Not all active protection systems are designed to fire at the extreme elevations necessary to protect against such munitions. RPGs fired at a steep downward angle from elevated positions can pose a similar threat.

Examples of active protection systems (country of origin)

[edit]

Hard-kill measures

[edit]
American Quick Kill system takes out an RPG in a test October 2007
A demonstration video clip of KAPS

Soft-kill measures

[edit]
K2 Black Panther's multispectral screening smoke grenade launcher

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Танк Т-14 "Армата" или Т-99 "Приоритет"" [Tank T-14 "Armata" or T-99 "priority"] (in Russian). vpk.name. Retrieved 6 May 2015.
  2. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-05-18. Retrieved 2017-03-26.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
[edit]

Further reading

[edit]