Talk:Ravenous (1999 film): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Removed Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
(14 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Film|British-task-force=yes|American-task-force=yes |
{{WikiProject Comedy}} |
||
{{WikiProject Film|British-task-force=yes|American-task-force=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Horror| |
{{WikiProject Horror|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Westerns|importance=Low|Film-task-force=yes}} |
||
{{Westerns|class=C}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
== Requested move 17 September 2017 == |
== Requested move 17 September 2017 == |
||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[WP:requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|||
The result of the move request was: '''moved'''. {{RMpmc}} — <span style="background:#0F4D92;color:white;padding:1px 10px;">[[User:Zawl|<span style="color:white;font-variant:Small-caps;">'''Za'''</span>]][[User talk:Zawl|<span style="color:white;font-variant:Small-caps;">'''wl'''</span>]]</span> 08:14, 24 September 2017 (UTC) |
|||
{{requested move/dated|multiple=yes |
|||
---- |
|||
|current1=Ravenous|new1=Ravenous (1999 film)|current2=Ravenous (disambiguation)|new2=Ravenous|}} |
|||
* [[:Ravenous]] → {{no redirect|Ravenous (1999 film)}} |
* [[:Ravenous]] → {{no redirect|Ravenous (1999 film)}} |
||
* [[:Ravenous (disambiguation)]] → {{no redirect|Ravenous}} |
* [[:Ravenous (disambiguation)]] → {{no redirect|Ravenous}} |
||
– This film is not well-known enough, nor was it commercially successful enough, to qualify as the primary topic for the plain title. Virtually the only identifiable reason I can locate for the 1999 film having the undabbed title is that it was the earliest article to ''get'' created — I can find no strong evidence that it outstrips any of the other Ravenouses in comparative notability. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC) |
– This film is not well-known enough, nor was it commercially successful enough, to qualify as the primary topic for the plain title. Virtually the only identifiable reason I can locate for the 1999 film having the undabbed title is that it was the earliest article to ''get'' created — I can find no strong evidence that it outstrips any of the other Ravenouses in comparative notability. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' per nomination. There are 7 titles listed upon the disambiguation page (with an additional 3 under "See also"), thus requiring an even greater burden of proof for any one entry to lay claim as the primary topic.[[User:Roman Spinner| —Roman Spinner]] <small>[[User talk:Roman Spinner|(talk)(contribs)]]</small> 20:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' – no primarytopic. [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 01:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
Latest revision as of 04:21, 29 December 2024
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 17 September 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Zawl 08:14, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
– This film is not well-known enough, nor was it commercially successful enough, to qualify as the primary topic for the plain title. Virtually the only identifiable reason I can locate for the 1999 film having the undabbed title is that it was the earliest article to get created — I can find no strong evidence that it outstrips any of the other Ravenouses in comparative notability. Bearcat (talk) 18:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. There are 7 titles listed upon the disambiguation page (with an additional 3 under "See also"), thus requiring an even greater burden of proof for any one entry to lay claim as the primary topic. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 20:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support – no primarytopic. Dicklyon (talk) 01:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- C-Class Comedy articles
- Unknown-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class British cinema articles
- British cinema task force articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class horror articles
- Low-importance horror articles
- WikiProject Horror articles
- C-Class Westerns articles
- Low-importance Westerns articles
- C-Class Westerns (genre) film articles
- Westerns (genre) film task force articles
- WikiProject Westerns articles