Talk:Andrew Breitbart: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Andrew Breitbart/Archive 2) (bot |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 7 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with unknown parameters) Tag: |
||
(39 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} |
{{Skip to talk}} |
||
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ap}} |
|||
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|listas=Breitbart, Andrew|blp=no|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography |
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject California |importance=Low |la=yes |la-importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Conservatism |
{{WikiProject Conservatism |importance=mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Judaism |importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=low |American=yes |American-importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject United States |importance=mid}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Copied |from=Andrew Breitbart |from_oldid=498234431|to=Breitbart.com|http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Breitbart.com&diff=498574138&oldid=475390933 |23:11, 20 June 2012}} |
{{Copied |from=Andrew Breitbart |from_oldid=498234431|to=Breitbart.com|http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Breitbart.com&diff=498574138&oldid=475390933 |23:11, 20 June 2012}} |
||
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I |age=2 |units=months }} |
|||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
||
|target=Talk:Andrew Breitbart/Archive index |
|target=Talk:Andrew Breitbart/Archive index |
||
Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
|algo = old(60d) |
|algo = old(60d) |
||
|archive = Talk:Andrew Breitbart/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Talk:Andrew Breitbart/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
|||
{{refideas| |
|||
1=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/how-breitbart-destroyed-andrew-breitbarts-legacy/545807/ |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
== |
==Attribution== |
||
Text and references copied from [[Orson Bean]] to [[Andrew Breitbart]], See former article's history for a list of contributors. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 17:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Please forgive if I'm doing this wrong. I almost never get into this section. Story says he collapsed in the morning. This site - assuming it's a faithful copy of the actual coroner's report - said they got a 911 call about him collapsing while walking on 2/29 at 11:36 pm and he was pronounced at 12:19 am on 3/1. (Also documents a blood alcohol of 0.4%, not 0.04%, but that's a typo; the accompanying toxicology shows 0.04%.) |
|||
⚫ | |||
http://www.autopsyfiles.org/reports/Celebs/breitbart,%20andrew_report.pdf |
|||
Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/178.128.188.200|178.128.188.200]] ([[User talk:178.128.188.200#top|talk]]) 16:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Opposition To Communism== |
|||
I have heard Brietbart speak out against communism. Does anyone object to adding the category American anti-communists? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/107.130.50.1|107.130.50.1]] ([[User talk:107.130.50.1|talk]]) 23:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Death == |
|||
== intro has odd unexplained references to things - removed == |
|||
Hello. I have added this section to the article twice, and it has been taken down each time: |
|||
the intro had these words as part of the sentence about his Breitbart news site: |
|||
In his obituary of Breitbart, [[Rolling Stone]] columnist [[Matt Taibbi]] wrote: " . . . no homage is complete without a celebration of the whole man, and the whole man in this case was not just a guy who once said, “It’s all about a good laugh,” but also someone who liked to publish peoples’ personal information on the internet, hack into private web sites<ref>{{cite news |
|||
"along with multiple other "BIG" sites – BIGHollywood, BIGGovernment, BIGJournalism." |
|||
|url=http://gawker.com/5850054/meet-the-guy-who-snitched-on-occupy-wall-street-to-the-fbi-and-nypd |
|||
that is not self explanatory, so until someone can explain what that means, or what those are, it has been removed. Are they website names? are they just someone's idea of what he stood for or against? this isn't clear at all and needs to be expressed in a proper form. They were not links, and not expressed as .coms or other domain names. So, if you want that on there, at least let the public know what you are talking about. That would be proper journalism. |
|||
|title=Meet the Guy Who Snitched on Occupy Wall Street to the FBI and NYPD |
|||
[[User:Meat Eating Orchid|Meat Eating Orchid]] ([[User talk:Meat Eating Orchid|talk]]) 01:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC) |
|||
|first=Adrian |last=Chen |date=October 15, 2011}}</ref>, tell lies in an attempt to get his enemies fired<ref>{{cite news |
|||
|url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2012/03/shirley-sherrods-suit-against-andrew-breitbart-likely-to-continue-116078 |
|||
|title=Shirley Sherrod's suit against Andrew Breitbart likely to continue |
|||
|first=Josh |last=Gerstein |date=March 1, 2012}}</ref>, and incite readers to threats<ref>{{cite news |
|||
|url=http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/09/18/andrew-breitbart-incites-violence-against-liberals-says-military-will-back-the-tea-party-up/ |
|||
|title=Andrew Breitbart Incites Violence Against Liberals, Says Military Will Back The Tea Party Up |
|||
|date=September 18, 2011}}</ref> against his targets and their families, including death threats."<ref>{{cite news |
|||
|url=http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/andrew-breitbart-death-of-a-douche-20120301 |
|||
|title=Andrew Breitbart: Death of a Douche |
|||
|first=Matt |last=Taibbi |date=March 1, 2011}}</ref> |
|||
== [[:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory]] has an [[WP:RFC|RFC]]== |
|||
I am writing to ask why this has been removed from the article. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.71.96.211|67.71.96.211]] ([[User talk:67.71.96.211|talk]]) 18:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>'''[[:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory]]''' has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the '''[[discussion page|discussion page]]'''.<!-- Template:Rfc notice--> Thank you. [[User:Emir of Wikipedia|Emir of Wikipedia]] ([[User talk:Emir of Wikipedia|talk]]) 20:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:I removed it because it looks to me like you're attributing opinions to Taibbi. The references you're adding to apparently corroborate Taibbi's statements aren't written by Taibbi. This looks like [[WP:OR]] to me, as it seems to be an individual/original interpretation of what Taibbi may have meant in his statements. [[User:Safehaven86|Safehaven86]] ([[User talk:Safehaven86|talk]]) 18:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Correction == |
|||
::Clearly, this is Original Research. Not appropriate. [[User:Capitalismojo|Capitalismojo]] ([[User talk:Capitalismojo|talk]]) 21:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
{{reflist-talk}} |
|||
Article has it right in opening paragraph, "conservative journalist"... Later in article he is called far right. This is wrong. [[Special:Contributions/2603:6081:7600:1D00:388D:625E:9345:6AB0|2603:6081:7600:1D00:388D:625E:9345:6AB0]] ([[User talk:2603:6081:7600:1D00:388D:625E:9345:6AB0|talk]]) 01:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
:If the [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] call him or his sites far-right, that's what we say here. We don't include original research. --[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|<span class="gfSarekSig">SarekOfVulcan (talk)</span>]] 02:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Criticism and controversies section needed == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
⚫ | |||
I have just modified {{plural:3|one external link|3 external links}} on [[Andrew Breitbart]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=749162255 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002155759/http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/289587-8 to http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/289587-8 |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121212021939/http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-03-06/politics/31125723_1_andrew-breitbart-cpac-bloggers to http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-03-06/politics/31125723_1_andrew-breitbart-cpac-bloggers |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120419075311/http://campusprogress.org:80/articles/exclusive_video_andrew_breitbart_to_occupiers_stop_raping_people to http://campusprogress.org/articles/exclusive_video_andrew_breitbart_to_occupiers_stop_raping_people/ |
|||
⚫ | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). |
|||
== Some or Many. Journalists and academics don't all have the same opinion. == |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
"....far-right news and opinion website, which has been described as misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by academics and journalists." |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
"far-right news and opinion website, which has been described as misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by SOME ? MANY academics and journalists." |
|||
== Death section == |
|||
Not every journalist in the world has the same opinion surely? [[Special:Contributions/82.31.108.103|82.31.108.103]] ([[User talk:82.31.108.103|talk]]) 11:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
In the second paragraph of the "Death" section, an IP [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Breitbart&diff=754189688&oldid=754009373 changed] "Unsubstantiated conspiracy theories arose about his death" to "Still not proven theories arose about his death". This is problematic per [[WP:FRINGE]], suggesting that the conspiracy theories that he was murdered are in any way legit, and just "unproven". The neutral way to handle it is to call it like it is, unsubstantiated. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 23:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:Hi. This is user Democraticfreethinker. Editing from an ip because surprise! got a ban. I have assumed good faith with you, then waited for discussion as you said. I find that I am repaid with false accusations (of which I would like you to show evidence, please). Coincidentally I wanted to tell you that I was still waiting for you to give an argument as your comment so far was all smoke and no fire. I am open to hearing one answer for you, if not, you'll be pleased to hear that you just drove off yet another editor from wikipedia (their number isn't exactly going up these days, is it?) |
|||
⚫ | |||
:::I'm sure you didn't have anything to do with it, right? |
|||
Well please look at this edit: |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zzuuzz&oldid=754310724 |
|||
So please enough with lies and if you talk with Zzuuzz for accusing people, go talk with him to show me your evidence, and if not, an apology from you both. Thank you <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.78.16.204|84.78.16.204]] ([[User talk:84.78.16.204#top|talk]]) 00:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:He blocked your account ''before'' I posted that message. I saw your block as due to having multiple accounts, and I'll trust an admin over you. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 00:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, for the record the account was blocked by me before any other communication. It's normal for admins to make surprise [[WP:DUCK|duck]]-blocks, and for other users to ask admins for clarification. The similarities between these new accounts and Spanish IP addresses is a bit of a no-brainer. Once logged in we ask people to stick to one account. If you want to make it this account, now that that's clear, we can agree to those terms for unblocking. Just log in and post a request, and we'll deal with it over there. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 00:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
I expect an apology here admitting all your misrakes and on your user page. Then we can talk <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/213.143.50.198|213.143.50.198]] ([[User talk:213.143.50.198#top|talk]]) 00:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:There's nothing to apologise for, so it's not going to happen. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 00:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Of course not. It's perfectly normal what you did, I'll put an example: I see a chinese editor. Then right after another chinese ip edits: They're related, there's no way I can be wrong! I demand an apology until you demonstrate how and why is my ip related to that of those multiple users <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.78.17.120|84.78.17.120]] ([[User talk:84.78.17.120#top|talk]]) 00:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:If you wish to communicate with me further, please address my talk page. If you wish to make a complaint about my admin actions, [[WP:ANI]] is where you'll find the boomerang of justice. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 00:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
I prefer to have adiscussion in an open way on a public page instead of among your gang in a restricted surveilled page controlled by them. Are you maybe telling me this because you fear transparency and openness? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.78.16.171|84.78.16.171]] ([[User talk:84.78.16.171#top|talk]]) 01:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Latest revision as of 23:15, 30 December 2024
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrew Breitbart article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Andrew Breitbart was copied or moved into Breitbart.com. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Attribution
[edit]Text and references copied from Orson Bean to Andrew Breitbart, See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
intro has odd unexplained references to things - removed
[edit]the intro had these words as part of the sentence about his Breitbart news site:
"along with multiple other "BIG" sites – BIGHollywood, BIGGovernment, BIGJournalism."
that is not self explanatory, so until someone can explain what that means, or what those are, it has been removed. Are they website names? are they just someone's idea of what he stood for or against? this isn't clear at all and needs to be expressed in a proper form. They were not links, and not expressed as .coms or other domain names. So, if you want that on there, at least let the public know what you are talking about. That would be proper journalism. Meat Eating Orchid (talk) 01:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Correction
[edit]Article has it right in opening paragraph, "conservative journalist"... Later in article he is called far right. This is wrong. 2603:6081:7600:1D00:388D:625E:9345:6AB0 (talk) 01:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- If the reliable sources call him or his sites far-right, that's what we say here. We don't include original research. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Criticism and controversies section needed
[edit](self explanatory) 120.21.18.26 (talk) 18:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- No, per WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION. Self-explanatory. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Some or Many. Journalists and academics don't all have the same opinion.
[edit]"....far-right news and opinion website, which has been described as misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by academics and journalists."
"far-right news and opinion website, which has been described as misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by SOME ? MANY academics and journalists."
Not every journalist in the world has the same opinion surely? 82.31.108.103 (talk) 11:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- C-Class vital articles in People
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- C-Class Los Angeles articles
- Low-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Mid-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Mid-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Mid-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles