Jump to content

Talk:Go (programming language): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 37 discussion(s) to Talk:Go (programming language)/Archive 1) (bot
Tag: Replaced
Jorjulio (talk | contribs)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
{{Archives|age=60|units=days|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{Archives|age=60|units=days|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{oldafdfull|page=Go (programming language)|date=12 November 2009|result='''speedy keep'''}}
{{oldafdfull|page=Go (programming language)|date=12 November 2009|result='''speedy keep'''}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Computer science |class=B |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Computer science |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Computing |software=yes|software-importance=High|class=B |importance=High|free-software=yes|free-software-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=High|software=yes|software-importance=High|free-software=yes|free-software-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Google |class=B |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Google |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Plan 9 |class=B |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Plan 9}}
}}
}}


== third sentence of opening paragraph ("Its simplicity express ...") ==
== obligatory Disambiguation page line ==


I nominate the sentence "Its simplicity express through its basic syntax of the language itself and its large library that help the developer to have a small stack for its project" for scrutiny and improvement efforts. What is it trying to say? What is its role in this first paragraph? [[User:Jorjulio|Jorjulio]] ([[User talk:Jorjulio|talk]]) 13:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
i tried adding it but im a noob! Go (disambiguation) needs to exist, google comes here first for daft reasons.

== Plan 9 C ==

[[Go (programming language)#Design|The page]] mentions Go is inspired by Plan 9's C dialect, but the [https://go.dev/doc/asm reference] only talks about Plan 9 assembly conventions. Is there even such a thing as a Plan 9 C dialect? [[User:MattF|MattF]] ([[User talk:MattF|talk]]) 14:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

:{{reply to|Mattf}} I believe the dialect being referred to, is what is mentioned on page 9 [https://css.csail.mit.edu/6.824/2014/papers/plan9.pdf here]. The <nowiki>[Pike95]</nowiki> citation mention in this document should be [https://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/comp this]. But I agree that a better source more explicitly describing the influence between this Plan 9 C dialect and Go might be beneficial. --[[User:Askeuhd|askeuhd]] ([[User talk:Askeuhd|talk]]) 11:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

:The design section gives the impression that C was the only influence, versus being among the various influences as shown in the influenced by section. Robert Griesemer has publicly stated that he was also influenced by Oberon-2 (which shows in the influenced by section). Refer to- [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ReKdcpNyQg/ The Evolution of Go from 17:00 on]. Maybe there needs to be more elaboration about the design influences.
:[[User:Wukuendo|Wukuendo]] ([[User talk:Wukuendo|talk]]) 02:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
:There was specifically support for compiling plan 9 C in the GC compiler, per an old design document https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P3BLR31VA8cvLJLfMibSuTdwTuF7WWLux71CYD0eeD8. The command was "6c" and [https://github.com/golang/go/issues/5115 worked like] [http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/1/8c the plan9 6c]. [[User:Artoria2e5|Artoria]][[User talk:Artoria2e5|2e5]] <small style="font-weight:lighter">[[Special:Contributions/Artoria2e5|🌉]]</small> 05:54, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:19, 1 January 2025

third sentence of opening paragraph ("Its simplicity express ...")

[edit]

I nominate the sentence "Its simplicity express through its basic syntax of the language itself and its large library that help the developer to have a small stack for its project" for scrutiny and improvement efforts. What is it trying to say? What is its role in this first paragraph? Jorjulio (talk) 13:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]