Classical logic: Difference between revisions
→Non-classical logics: Intuitionistic logic rejects double negative elimination |
→Further reading: pull commons link into inline EL |
||
(164 intermediate revisions by 82 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Class of formal logics}} |
|||
'''Classical logic''' identifies a class of [[formal logic]]s that have been most intensively studied and most widely used. They are characterised by a number of properties; '''non-classical logics''' are those that lack one or more of these properties, which are: |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
'''Classical logic''' (or '''standard logic''')<ref name="BunninYu2004">{{cite book|author1=Nicholas Bunnin|author2=Jiyuan Yu|title=The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OskKWI1YA7AC&pg=PA266|year=2004|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|isbn=978-1-4051-0679-5|page=266}}</ref><ref name="Gamut1991">{{cite book|author=L. T. F. Gamut|author-link=L. T. F. Gamut|title=Logic, language, and meaning, Volume 1: Introduction to Logic|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Z0KhywkpolMC&pg=PA156|year=1991|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-28085-1|pages=156–157}}</ref> or '''Frege–Russell logic'''<ref name="Kanamori2000">{{cite conference|title=Introduction|book-title=Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy|volume=6|publisher=Philosophy Documentation Center|url=https://www.bu.edu/wcp/IntroV6.htm|author=Akihiro Kanamori|year=2000}}</ref> is the intensively studied and most widely used class of [[deductive logic]].<ref name=":0" /> Classical logic has had much influence on [[analytic philosophy]]. |
|||
In ''Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism'' [[Susan Haack]] divided non-classical logics into [[Deviant logic|deviant]], quasi-deviant, and extended logics. |
|||
==Characteristics== |
|||
==Examples of classical logics== |
|||
⚫ | Each logical system in this class shares characteristic properties:<ref>[[Dov Gabbay|Gabbay, Dov]], (1994). 'Classical vs non-classical logic'. In D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger, and J.A. Robinson, (Eds), ''Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming'', volume 2, chapter 2.6. Oxford University Press.</ref> |
||
*[[Aristotle]]'s [[Organon]] introduces his theory of [[syllogistic]], which is a logic with a restricted form of judgements: assertions take one of four forms, ''All Ps are Q'', ''Some Ps are Q'', ''No Ps are Q'', and ''Some Ps are not Q''. These judgements find themselves if two pairs of two dual operators, and each operator is the negation of another, relationships that Aristotle summarised with his [[square of opposition|square of oppositions]]. Aristotle explicitly formulated the law of the excluded middle and law of noncontradiction in justifying his system, although these laws cannot be expressed as judgements within the syllogistic framework. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
While not entailed by the preceding conditions, contemporary discussions of classical logic normally only include [[propositional calculus|propositional]] and [[first-order logic|first-order]] logics.<ref name=":0">[[Stewart Shapiro|Shapiro, Stewart]] (2000). Classical Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Web]. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab. Retrieved October 28, 2006, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/</ref><ref name="haack">[[Susan Haack|Haack, Susan]], (1996). ''Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism''. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</ref> In other words, the overwhelming majority of time spent studying classical logic has been spent studying specifically propositional and first-order logic, as opposed to the other forms of classical logic. |
|||
*[[George Boole]]'s algebraic reformulation of logic, his system of [[Boolean logic]]; |
|||
Most semantics of classical logic are [[Principle of bivalence|bivalent]], meaning all of the possible denotations of propositions can be categorized as either true or false. |
|||
*[[Gottlob Frege]]'s [[Begriffsschrift]]. |
|||
==History== |
|||
*[[Clarence Irving Lewis]]'s systems S1-S5 of alethic modal logic. |
|||
{{main|History of logic}} |
|||
==Non-classical logics== |
|||
Classical logic is a 19th and 20th-century innovation. The name does not refer to [[classical antiquity]], which used the [[term logic]] of [[Aristotle]]. Classical logic was the reconciliation of Aristotle's logic, which dominated most of the last 2000 years, with the propositional [[Stoic logic]]. The two were sometimes seen as irreconcilable. |
|||
*[[Intuitionistic logic]] rejects the law of the excluded middle, double negative elimination, and the De Morgan's laws; |
|||
*[[Paraconsistent logic]] (e.g., [[dialetheism]] and [[relevance logic]]) rejects the law of noncontradiction; |
|||
*[[Relevance logic]], [[linear logic]], and [[non-monotonic logic]] reject monotonicity of entailment; |
|||
*[[Linear logic]] rejects idempotency of entailment; |
|||
*[[Computability logic]] is a semantically constructed formal theory of computability, as opposed to classical logic, which is a formal theory of truth; integrates and extends classical, linear and intuitionistic logics; |
|||
*[[Modal logic]] extends classical logic with [[Truth function|non-truth-functional]] ("modal") operators. |
|||
[[Leibniz]]'s [[calculus ratiocinator]] can be seen as foreshadowing classical logic. [[Bernard Bolzano]] has the understanding of [[existential import]] found in classical logic and not in Aristotle. Though he never questioned Aristotle, [[George Boole]]'s algebraic reformulation of logic, so-called [[Boolean logic]], was a predecessor of modern [[mathematical logic]] and classical logic. [[William Stanley Jevons]] and [[John Venn]], who also had the modern understanding of existential import, expanded Boole's system. |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[File:Begriffsschrift Titel.png|thumb|180px|Begriffsschrift title page]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
The original [[first-order logic|first-order]], classical logic is found in [[Gottlob Frege]]'s ''[[Begriffsschrift]]''. It has a wider application than Aristotle's logic and is capable of expressing Aristotle's logic as a special case. It explains the [[quantifier (logic)|quantifier]]s in terms of mathematical functions. It was also the first logic capable of dealing with the [[problem of multiple generality]], for which Aristotle's system was impotent. Frege, who is considered the founder of analytic philosophy, invented it to show all of mathematics was derivable from logic, and make [[arithmetic]] rigorous as [[David Hilbert]] had done for [[geometry]], the doctrine is known as [[logicism]] in the [[foundations of mathematics]]. The notation Frege used never much caught on. [[Hugh MacColl]] published a variant of propositional logic two years prior. |
|||
*[[Susan Haack]], (1996). ''Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism''. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
|||
The writings of [[Augustus De Morgan]] and [[Charles Sanders Peirce]] also pioneered classical logic with the logic of relations. Peirce influenced [[Giuseppe Peano]] and [[Ernst Schröder (mathematician)|Ernst Schröder]]. |
|||
[[de:Klassische Logik]] |
|||
[[zh:经典逻辑]] |
|||
Classical logic reached fruition in [[Bertrand Russell]] and [[A. N. Whitehead]]'s ''Principia Mathematica'', and [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]]'s ''[[Tractatus Logico Philosophicus]]''. Russell and Whitehead were influenced by Peano (it uses his notation) and Frege and sought to show mathematics was derived from logic. Wittgenstein was influenced by Frege and Russell and initially considered the ''Tractatus'' to have solved all problems of philosophy. |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[Willard Van Orman Quine]] believed that a formal system that allows quantification over predicates ([[higher-order logic]]) didn't meet the requirements to be a logic, saying that it was "[[set theory]] in disguise". |
|||
Classical logic is the standard logic of mathematics. Many mathematical theorems rely on classical rules of inference such as [[disjunctive syllogism]] and the [[double negation elimination]]. The adjective "classical" in logic is not related to the use of the adjective "classical" in physics, which has another meaning. In logic, "classical" simply means "standard". Classical logic should also not be confused with [[term logic]], also known as Aristotelian logic. |
|||
[[Jan Łukasiewicz]] pioneered [[non-classical logic]]. |
|||
==Generalized semantics== |
|||
With the advent of [[algebraic logic]], it became apparent that classical [[propositional calculus]] admits other [[semantics]]. In [[Boolean-valued semantics]] (for classical [[propositional logic]]), the truth values are the elements of an arbitrary [[Boolean algebra (structure)|Boolean algebra]]; "true" corresponds to the maximal element of the algebra, and "false" corresponds to the minimal element. Intermediate elements of the algebra correspond to truth values other than "true" and "false". The principle of bivalence holds only when the Boolean algebra is taken to be the [[two-element Boolean algebra|two-element algebra]], which has no intermediate elements. |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
== Further reading == |
|||
* {{commons-inline}} |
|||
* Warren Goldfarb, "Deductive Logic", 1st edition, 2003, {{ISBN|0-87220-660-2}} |
|||
{{Classical logic}} |
|||
{{Mathematical logic}} |
|||
{{Portal bar|Philosophy}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Classical logic| ]] |
|||
[[Category:History of logic]] |
|||
⚫ |
Latest revision as of 17:51, 1 January 2025
Classical logic (or standard logic)[1][2] or Frege–Russell logic[3] is the intensively studied and most widely used class of deductive logic.[4] Classical logic has had much influence on analytic philosophy.
Characteristics
[edit]Each logical system in this class shares characteristic properties:[5]
- Law of excluded middle and double negation elimination
- Law of noncontradiction, and the principle of explosion
- Monotonicity of entailment and idempotency of entailment
- Commutativity of conjunction
- De Morgan duality: every logical operator is dual to another
While not entailed by the preceding conditions, contemporary discussions of classical logic normally only include propositional and first-order logics.[4][6] In other words, the overwhelming majority of time spent studying classical logic has been spent studying specifically propositional and first-order logic, as opposed to the other forms of classical logic.
Most semantics of classical logic are bivalent, meaning all of the possible denotations of propositions can be categorized as either true or false.
History
[edit]Classical logic is a 19th and 20th-century innovation. The name does not refer to classical antiquity, which used the term logic of Aristotle. Classical logic was the reconciliation of Aristotle's logic, which dominated most of the last 2000 years, with the propositional Stoic logic. The two were sometimes seen as irreconcilable.
Leibniz's calculus ratiocinator can be seen as foreshadowing classical logic. Bernard Bolzano has the understanding of existential import found in classical logic and not in Aristotle. Though he never questioned Aristotle, George Boole's algebraic reformulation of logic, so-called Boolean logic, was a predecessor of modern mathematical logic and classical logic. William Stanley Jevons and John Venn, who also had the modern understanding of existential import, expanded Boole's system.
The original first-order, classical logic is found in Gottlob Frege's Begriffsschrift. It has a wider application than Aristotle's logic and is capable of expressing Aristotle's logic as a special case. It explains the quantifiers in terms of mathematical functions. It was also the first logic capable of dealing with the problem of multiple generality, for which Aristotle's system was impotent. Frege, who is considered the founder of analytic philosophy, invented it to show all of mathematics was derivable from logic, and make arithmetic rigorous as David Hilbert had done for geometry, the doctrine is known as logicism in the foundations of mathematics. The notation Frege used never much caught on. Hugh MacColl published a variant of propositional logic two years prior.
The writings of Augustus De Morgan and Charles Sanders Peirce also pioneered classical logic with the logic of relations. Peirce influenced Giuseppe Peano and Ernst Schröder.
Classical logic reached fruition in Bertrand Russell and A. N. Whitehead's Principia Mathematica, and Ludwig Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico Philosophicus. Russell and Whitehead were influenced by Peano (it uses his notation) and Frege and sought to show mathematics was derived from logic. Wittgenstein was influenced by Frege and Russell and initially considered the Tractatus to have solved all problems of philosophy.
Willard Van Orman Quine believed that a formal system that allows quantification over predicates (higher-order logic) didn't meet the requirements to be a logic, saying that it was "set theory in disguise".
Classical logic is the standard logic of mathematics. Many mathematical theorems rely on classical rules of inference such as disjunctive syllogism and the double negation elimination. The adjective "classical" in logic is not related to the use of the adjective "classical" in physics, which has another meaning. In logic, "classical" simply means "standard". Classical logic should also not be confused with term logic, also known as Aristotelian logic.
Jan Łukasiewicz pioneered non-classical logic.
Generalized semantics
[edit]With the advent of algebraic logic, it became apparent that classical propositional calculus admits other semantics. In Boolean-valued semantics (for classical propositional logic), the truth values are the elements of an arbitrary Boolean algebra; "true" corresponds to the maximal element of the algebra, and "false" corresponds to the minimal element. Intermediate elements of the algebra correspond to truth values other than "true" and "false". The principle of bivalence holds only when the Boolean algebra is taken to be the two-element algebra, which has no intermediate elements.
References
[edit]- ^ Nicholas Bunnin; Jiyuan Yu (2004). The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 266. ISBN 978-1-4051-0679-5.
- ^ L. T. F. Gamut (1991). Logic, language, and meaning, Volume 1: Introduction to Logic. University of Chicago Press. pp. 156–157. ISBN 978-0-226-28085-1.
- ^ Akihiro Kanamori (2000). "Introduction". Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Vol. 6. Philosophy Documentation Center.
- ^ a b Shapiro, Stewart (2000). Classical Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Web]. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab. Retrieved October 28, 2006, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/
- ^ Gabbay, Dov, (1994). 'Classical vs non-classical logic'. In D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger, and J.A. Robinson, (Eds), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, volume 2, chapter 2.6. Oxford University Press.
- ^ Haack, Susan, (1996). Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Further reading
[edit]- Media related to Classical logic at Wikimedia Commons
- Warren Goldfarb, "Deductive Logic", 1st edition, 2003, ISBN 0-87220-660-2