Jump to content

Talk:Diatomaceous earth: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Soil|class=b|importance=mid }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|
{{WikiProject Soil|importance=mid }}
{{WikiProject Geology
{{WikiProject Geology
|class=b
|importance=Low
|importance=Low
|attention=
|attention=
Line 8: Line 8:
|peer-review=
|peer-review=
|old-peer-review= }}
|old-peer-review= }}
{{WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health|class=b|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health|importance=low}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(365d)
| archive=Talk:Diatomaceous earth/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=1
| maxarchivesize=75K
| archiveheader={{Aan}}
| minthreadsleft=1
| minthreadstoarchive=1
}}
}}


== Confusion regarding safety for humans. ==
==Wording change for clarity==
This sentence, "Natural diatomaceous earth (freshwater) is preferred by many researchers over chromic oxide, which has been widely used for the same purpose, but which is also a known carcinogen and therefore a potential hazard to research personnel." has some ambiguity. Which type is a carcinogen?

Try this, "Natural diatomaceous earth (freshwater) is preferred by many researchers over chromic oxide, which has been widely used for the same purpose, because chromic oxide is also a known carcinogen and therefore a potential hazard to research personnel."

Or try this, "Natural diatomaceous earth (freshwater) is preferred by many researchers over chromic oxide, which has been widely used for the same purpose, because natural diatomaceous earth (freshwater) is also a known carcinogen and therefore a potential hazard to research personnel."

My ignorance made it necessary to submit both wordings. That I had to submit both wordings demonstrates the problem with the original wording. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.23.193.142|76.23.193.142]] ([[User talk:76.23.193.142|talk]]) 11:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


:´Kieselgur´ the best exact translation seems to be ´diatom´. <br>
:In german ´(Kieselgu(h)r to english:) Diatomaceous earth´ are products for cosmetics. <br>
:´Kieselalge´ is the animal (or bacteria or what, sorry) from which the ´Kieselgu(h)r´ is from. There is no english word, I could find for Kieselalge, too. ´Pebble-alga´ meets it exact. <br>
:´Kieselerde´ (to english: Silica; but best direct word translate to pebble-soil or even pebble-earth) in Germany, in german, are products, which can but not must include ´Kieselalge´, Kieselgu(h)r, pebble-alga; despite it is to misunderstand (misleading) so. <br>
:''The following (external) link did help me with to understand it this way:'' <br>
:(German) https://www.kieselgurwissen.de/kieselgur-und-kieselerde/ (translation to english) http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kieselgurwissen.de%2Fkieselgur-und-kieselerde%2F<br>
:--[[User:Visionhelp|Visionhelp]] ([[User talk:Visionhelp|talk]]) 12:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC) <br>

==Untitled==
Some text in this article has been merged from [[Kieselguhr]]. See the history of that page for authorship record.
----
Someone might want to put something in here about diatomaceous earth as a pest repellant..

----

The sudden usage of the term 'Kieselgur' is somewhat confusing and out of context. Could someone rewrite this to make the connection a little easier to make? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Etherdave|Etherdave]] ([[User talk:Etherdave|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Etherdave|contribs]]) 20:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Needs expansion==
This article should say more about the formation of Diatomaceous earth, as well as where it is found, how it is processed, etc. [[User:Zocky|Zocky]] 11:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


And perhaps a note on its abundance? How much of this stuff is there on earth? [[User:Mdclxvi|mdclxvi]] 09:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
:I wonder if there has been any research done on an eventual man-made replacement, since "fossilized remains" are pretty obviously a finite resource. [[User:Diggernet|Diggernet]] ([[User talk:Diggernet|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 22:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

need info about diatomites as reservoir rocks. In California alone, they contain billions of barrels of oil. --[[User:Cmross6|cmross6]] ([[User talk:Cmross6|talk]]) 17:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

:It it also one of the ingredients in my bait snare matt paste (hair wax). Probably worth some form of mention in the article that the ingredient can be found in hair products. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 08:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Section 2.4 uses a link that is mere opinion, not remotely creditable. I can't find anything that supports that claim at all using google. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.90.123.177|71.90.123.177]] ([[User talk:71.90.123.177|talk]]) 08:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Coffin-like? ==

''Diatomaceous earth has a high porosity because it is made of microscopically small coffin-like hollow particles.'' - I suppose I can kind of imagine that...but coffin-like in what way? The shape of the particles? [[User:Mithridates|Mithridates]] 15:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

:Well, diatomaceous earth is technically composed of skeletons, which at one point contained dead diatom cytoplasm...maybe it was a pun? -- <font color="#668353">[[User:Stillnotelf|stillnotelf]]</font> <font color="#ff4487">[[User talk:Stillnotelf|has a talk page]]</font> 23:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

== Do people eat it? ==

When used as a parasiticide in animals and people, do they have to ingest this stuff? I have seen some of this (I believe) in a convenience store in a VERY rural area and was told by the clerk that people just called it "white dirt" and bought it to eat, I couldn't imagine why at the time.[[User:72.242.143.24|72.242.143.24]] 23:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

:It can be spread in a persons yard to kill fleas. Very cheap and effective.

::I know that horses have it added to their feed.. AND my roomate and I used it to rid ourselves of bedbugs. VERY effective though it takes a LONG time to clean up and many moppings. (Plus makes you feel rather dry from just being in the environment) [[User:205.233.28.39|205.233.28.39]] 20:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

:::A lot of people eat this stuff... it is considered to be healthy by many, not just in rural areas. i am suprrised this article does not mention it. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:132.205.103.68|132.205.103.68]] ([[User talk:132.205.103.68|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/132.205.103.68|contribs]]) 00:34, 26 February 2013</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
::::It seems to be applied topically for treatment of external pests, such as fleas, tics, lice, bed bugs, and sometimes taken internally, primarily for worms and other parasites, but claims for benefit of ingestion seemingly have no limit. Ingestion of French clay seems an apt comparison, though DE would be a more effective cleanse, being more abrasive. I don't personally recommend ANY of the above, only reporting what I have gleaned from reading. "Whatever doesn't kill me makes me stronger" was Nietsche's claim. I say, "Buyer beware!" [[User:Ragityman|Rags]] ([[User talk:Ragityman|talk]]) 07:36, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Diatomaceous earth is indeed [https://www.diatomaceousearth.com/10lbs-food-grade-diatomaceous-earth/ sold specifically for human consumption]. From the reviews, buyers appear to consume a spoonful or two daily (usually mixed with juice or another drink). Claimed health benefits include, "Better sleep...Improved Elimination, Improved Muscle Tone, Lower Candida Overgrowth, Releasing Excess Weight, Softer skin, [and] Stronger Hair And Nails." I'd also very much like to see some properly sourced discussion of this on the page.
[[User:Cjs|Cjs]] ([[User talk:Cjs|talk]]) 23:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

I also. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2602:306:CF99:2080:5C67:E811:76F:52B7|2602:306:CF99:2080:5C67:E811:76F:52B7]] ([[User talk:2602:306:CF99:2080:5C67:E811:76F:52B7#top|talk]]) 18:32, 29 April 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Are all sources credited? ==

Much of the material, most noticeably the line about "The most common use (68%) of diatomaceous earth is as a filter medium, especially for swimming pools." also appears at http://www.amigo-business-centre.com/index_bestanden/Page1017.htm

While it is possible that amigo-business-centre.com got the information from this Wikipedia page, amigo's article seems to be much more complete.

[[User:Rfreedman|Rich Freedman]] ([[User talk:Rfreedman|talk]]) 18:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

----
"bird shit filter" - diatomaceous earth is the washed remains of millions of diatoms eaten by birds and deposited over the millennium usually at the base of cliffs hence the rather nasty sounding name

Need references for the geology section. Skeletons of both fresh and saltwater diatoms are composed of amorphous (noncrystalline) silica. Both types can convert to more crystalline forms of silica depending upon depth of burial. In addition, crystalline silica (eg quartz) may be deposited along with diatoms in both environments. The amount of this cystalline silica detritus depends on the proximity to the paleo shoreline along with relationship to steams, rivers, fans, and other slope deposits. --[[User:Cmross6|cmross6]] ([[User talk:Cmross6|talk]]) 17:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

== Pronounciation ==

Am I the only one who thought this was pronounced /ˌdaɪ'''a'''təˈmeɪʃəs ˈɝθ/ or /ˌdaɪ'''a'''t'''ɒ'''ˈmeɪʃəs ˈɝθ/ ?
— DIV, Melbourne ([[Special:Contributions/128.250.80.15|128.250.80.15]] ([[User talk:128.250.80.15|talk]]) 04:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC))
:Maybe it's a Strine vs. Merican thing. At my end of the world, any unstressed syllable is as likely to be pronounced /ə/ as not.

== As a Food Supplement ==

Some vitamin providers are promoting D.E. as a food supplement. If you read their ads (see www.earthworkshealth.com) it can cure just about everything: arthritis to constipation, skin problems, etc. They sell it as "Food Grade" product for humans & pets.

I can understand how it would be helpful to eliminate insects, but I fear powdering my dogs to eliminate his fleas might be dangerous to his lungs, since I am supposed to =wear a mask when opening the container... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.163.91.155|24.163.91.155]] ([[User talk:24.163.91.155|talk]]) 01:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== epidemiological studies ==

We need epidemiological studies into diatomaceous earth progression inside the lungs of animals and humans.


[aside - We need this type of statement for diatomaceous earth that explains its impact on human and animal lungs: Fiberglass passes through lung tissue and is expelled in the urn. Asbestos is too large in diameter and lodges in lung tissue, and the body attacks it which damages the lung tissue.]


I found a limited number of references to diatomaceous earth in lung tissue and if others agree, we should cite them.
[[User:Sponsion|Sponsion]] ([[User talk:Sponsion|talk]]) 17:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

== Awful source. ==

Source 9 is currently a garbage source. Suggest http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~fieldspg/fields/de-test-p.pdf, which contains the same information (explanation of how DE kills insects)
[[Special:Contributions/68.30.168.158|68.30.168.158]] ([[User talk:68.30.168.158|talk]]) 20:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

: Agreed. More significantly, however, the Wikipedia article doesn't even summarize that "garbage source" accurately. Reading the reference suggested above, I note that its explanation of the mechanism by which diatomaceous earth kills insects is at odds with the usual explanation, to wit, that it abrades (not absorbs) the waxy layer preventing water loss through the insect exoskeleton. I won't even hazard a guess which explanation is correct without further research, so for the moment will leave the article untouched.[[User:Floozybackloves|Floozybackloves]] ([[User talk:Floozybackloves|talk]]) 02:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

== [[:File:Diatomaceous Earth BrightField.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon ==
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that [[:File:Diatomaceous Earth BrightField.jpg]] will be appearing as [[Wikipedia:picture of the day|picture of the day]] on March 2, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at [[Template:POTD/2012-03-02]]. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the [[Main Page]] so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">—'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C;">howcheng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 18:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC) <!-- substituted from [[Template:UpcomingPOTD]] -->
{{POTD/2012-03-02}}

== Fulling/filling ==

A [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Diatomaceous_earth&diff=511221067&oldid=508800936 recent edit] suggests that "filling", not "fulling", was meant. Diatomaceous earth can be used for filtration in a way similar to [[fuller's earth]] (which was originally used for fulling wool); this might be the source of confusion. In the context of the article, I think "filtering" was what was meant.--[[User:Curtis Clark|Curtis Clark]] ([[User talk:Curtis Clark|talk]]) 18:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
:Although diatomaceous earth can be used for filtering, I think "filling" makes much more sense in the context of the sentence. Paints, soaps and detergents typically need some type of inert material in their formulations to adjust properties such as viscosity, texture, etc. [[User:Deli nk|Deli nk]] ([[User talk:Deli nk|talk]]) 18:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
::Although I see your point, in the context of that section it makes no sense. Since it is unsourced, I've removed it.--[[User:Curtis Clark|Curtis Clark]] ([[User talk:Curtis Clark|talk]]) 02:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
:::That's probably best. Thanks. [[User:Deli nk|Deli nk]] ([[User talk:Deli nk|talk]]) 18:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

== Change of absorption to adsorption ==

I suggest changing all occurences of the word "absorption" to "adsorption" because adsorption is taking place in all the described processes. Adsorption = binding of liquid/gas on the surface of sorbent, while absorption = taking up a substance into the volume of sorbent.
[[User:Vlachj|Vlachj]] ([[User talk:Vlachj|talk]]) 04:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

== PDF Bug in Section "2.8.2 Marker in livestock nutrition experiments" ==

When generating a PDF file from the article, the definitions for the terms that appear in the equation are incomplete.

The PDF shows:
"Where:
%N"
etc instead of
"Where:
%N is percent Nutrient Digestibility"
etc. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kiisu Buraun|Kiisu Buraun]] ([[User talk:Kiisu Buraun|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kiisu Buraun|contribs]]) 08:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Hi Kiisu Buraun, I can confirm the problem, but can't seem to really fix it right now. I changed the equation and explanation so you may render a somewhat useable PDF version. I tried HTML sub tags, but the PDF renderer does not 'sub' the capitals, so for now I used sub combined with small, which works somewhat. Still not very pretty, but I can't do better. Hope this helps. - Regards [[User:Snaily|Snaily]] ([[User talk:Snaily|talk]]) 11:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. The change is good enough for my purposes. Appreciated. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kiisu Buraun|Kiisu Buraun]] ([[User talk:Kiisu Buraun|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kiisu Buraun|contribs]]) 04:04, 10 October 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Rock? ==

I have to question the characterization as "rock." My understanding is that this material is made up of very porous and finely-divided silicious skeletal remains, more like dust than rock. "Sedimentary rock" is formed from sediment, but is nevertheless rock, NOT dust, powder, or sand. Any of these three can DERIVE from sedimentary rpck, but they are then dust (or sand, or chalk, or powder) DERIVED from sedimentary rock, and are no longer rock, particularly sedimentary rock, per se. I would argue that the sedimentary rock description is misleading, and altogether unhelpful. ("White dirt," mentioned above, is a more useful characterization!) As I am sure someone has secondary citations to support their description, I would point out that ultimately ANYTHING can be sourced. Common sense should apply. [[User:Ragityman|Rags]] ([[User talk:Ragityman|talk]]) 07:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on [[Diatomaceous earth]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=698769885 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140202205518/http://www.bonsaitreestuff.com/diatomaceous-earth/ to http://www.bonsaitreestuff.com/diatomaceous-earth/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080420063824/http://homepages.compuserve.de:80/tmby100/kieselgur.htm to http://homepages.compuserve.de/tmby100/kieselgur.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 03:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Diatomaceous earth]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=704211734 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928020701/http://www2.natpa.de/bonifatius/senken/p7.htm to http://www2.natpa.de/bonifatius/senken/p7.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 06:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

== article needs more info about being taken orally as supplement ==

Source of minerals (confirmed) and anti-parasitic (unconfirmed) .
Thanks,
[[User:Qwesar|Qwesar]] ([[User talk:Qwesar|talk]]) 03:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

:The german article, not in english, ´Kieselerde´ https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kieselerde, translation to english http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FKieselerde says more about this. <br>
:The difficulties already begins with the translation(s) ´Kieselerde´, or ´Kieselalge´, and the confusions do not end there. <br>
:But getting some better, when getting to the themes [[Micronutrient]] and [[Mineral (nutrient)]] and [[Healing clay]] (Medicinal clay), [[Mineral deficiency]], [[Micronutrient deficiency]]. <br>
:--[[User:Visionhelp|Visionhelp]] ([[User talk:Visionhelp|talk]]) 17:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


On the webpage selling "Garden Safe Diatomaceous Earth 4-lb Insect Killer" you see in caps OUTDOOR:
== External links modified ==


https://www.lowes.com/pd/Garden-Safe-Garden-Safe-Brand-Crawling-Insect-Killer-Containing-Diatomaceous-Earth-4-Pounds/5005382579
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


but then you see in the Overview:
I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on [[Diatomaceous earth]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=754408472 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928020701/http://www2.natpa.de/bonifatius/senken/p7.htm to http://www2.natpa.de/bonifatius/senken/p7.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131018021402/http://www.gov.mb.ca:80/agriculture/crops/cropproduction/faa06s00.html to http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/cropproduction/faa06s00.html


Use INDOORS and OUTDOORS: Apply a thin layer of dust to areas where crawling insects live and hide
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).


But in an answer to a question:
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Can use this product in the same room as my cat?


The answer is:
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 14:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
This product is not for indoor use as this is for outdoor use only.


But under features:
j0cx0l1g0


For Use in Kitchens/Bathrooms - YES
== Ni-Kieselguhr ==
''Kieselguhr'' is a synonym for diatomaceous earth (first sentence of article).
§ [[Diatomaceous earth#Catalyst support |Catalyst support]] said
: For example, '''nickel, referred to as Ni–Kieselguhr''', can be supported on the material to improve its activity as a hydrogenation catalyst.


Maybe they were talking about outhouses and barbecue pits?
Although the bolded text accurately quotes the source, as well as many other texts found by googling "define Ni-Kieselguhr", it hardly seems likely that the element nickel itself (chemical symbol Ni) would ever be called Ni-Kieselguhr, as the sentence asserts. The only sensible interpretation of this wording is that nickel ''supported on diatomaceous earth'', or the combination, is called Ni-Kieselguhr. I have changed the wording in the article to
: For example, nickel can be supported on the material – the combination is called Ni–Kieselguhr – to improve its activity as a hydrogenation catalyst.


And this is only the beginning of the problem. This confusion is over the definitions of: SiO2/silicon dioxide/silica, DE, crystalline silica, amorphous, colloidal, garden grade, food grade, feed grade, impurities, salt vs fresh water, toxic levels, Primary Active Ingredient, silica gel and so on.
--[[User:Thnidu|Thnidu]] ([[User talk:Thnidu|talk]]) 16:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


But the primary problem is the warning "Do Not Inhale". Given the massive use of DE in and around the home, the question is simple, is it safe? If it is so destructive to insects, then what does it do to my lungs? The mixed message on this webpage is like watching two idiots on Fox News say, "If you want to wear a mask, that's cool. If you don't want to wear a mask, that's cool."
== External links modified ==


So, please, somebody do the research of popular DE products being sold to homes and find out what is safe, if any.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


Thanks. [[User:Fair Use 36|Fair Use 36]] ([[User talk:Fair Use 36|talk]]) 21:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
I have just modified one external link on [[Diatomaceous earth]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/815548057|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130717171434/http://www.spca.bc.ca/assets/documents/welfare/professional-resources/farmer-resources/diatomaceous-earth-factsheet.pdf to http://www.spca.bc.ca/assets/documents/welfare/professional-resources/farmer-resources/diatomaceous-earth-factsheet.pdf
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/grsc_subi/Teaching/GRSC651/GRSC651_Courses_Material/lecture_slides/GRSC651_lect_20(1)_Inert_Dusts.pdf


:This appears to primarily be a complaint about the Lowes.com website, not a suggestion for improvements to this article, specifically. Wikipedia isn't a 'how to' or 'guide' for use of commercial products. It would not be within scope to present a listing of commercial diatomacaceous earth products declaring which are safe or unsafe. cheers. [[User:Anastrophe|anastrophe]], [[User talk:Anastrophe|an editor he is.]] 22:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


I've used a great lot of DE over my 81 years, and in response to the comments and questions above by Fair Use 36 here: There is really no such thing as indoor rather than outdoor DE. Aside from the difference between DE from different areas around the world there are only two grades: Food grade, and all other. The difference between Food grade is nothing more than it's being clean, and ground a little finer than the "all others." I have used both grades internally and externally with approximately the same results, none of which resulted in any problem.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}


As far as use goes, I have used DE both on my many animals, my wife and children, and no less than several neighbors quite successfully, internally, to kill various parasites, probably 95% being tape worms. I can't speak to the lungs question past that we all have been conscious of the possible risk, and therefore careful not to breath in any more than necessary, though some is inevitable.
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 14:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)


For both internal and external use on animals, fleas, ticks, lice, and etc. do fall prey to DE, but nothing like as easily as many online sites like to claim. I am always careful not to overdose, using body weight for the only criteria, and yet dose quantity seems to be of far less importance than keeping the dosing regular in timing of no more than once per day, and no less that once per three days, for no less than three doses and no more than for 12 doses in a row. The reason for this regimen is that I've experienced tape worms dying out in one single dose, given to a very young kitten that likely would have died otherwise, yet the majority of tape worm cures, regardless of the patient's size, took at least the middle dosage time and quantity of once every third day until a minimum of 9 doses was given. The hardest ones are cats and dogs, simply because they lick their anus, and therefore constantly resupply the intestines with both the fresh live segment worms and the semi-dried encapsulated segments. Of course you must kill the adult(s) first, which is the hardest part, but then you must also keep on dosing past the very last intake of both the tape worm segments, and the fleas that carry them. Thus you must kill the external parasites, AND the internal ones, or success may not come at all.
== terminal ileum ==


Outside, as in kennel and garden use, DE does work, yes, but the difficulties of wind and weather are Legion, due to the virtual impossibility of getting and keeping a sufficient quantity in place. Keep in mind that DE is useless unless the victim acquires a quantity that causes it to bleed out faster than it washes off, or its body systems plus it's cleanliness habits can remove it. That said, DE in conjunction with methods such as spraying soapy water have allowed me and mine to be totally poison free for more than 4 decades, while at the same time raising an impressive percentage of all our vegetable and animal needs.
Article states that the terminal ileum is the last third of the small intestine. It is, however, the point where the small intestine ends and the large intestine begins.[[User:Longinus876|Longinus876]] ([[User talk:Longinus876|talk]]) 07:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


Robert Leslie @ this IP address: [[Special:Contributions/174.251.240.123|174.251.240.123]] ([[User talk:174.251.240.123|talk]]) 10:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
== Peter Kasten and his diatomite well ==


:Thank you, very helpful. [[Special:Contributions/2.27.69.32|2.27.69.32]] ([[User talk:2.27.69.32|talk]]) 06:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
I've found a peer-reviewed source with the story -- but I can't trace it back any further; it's inadequately sourced in the peer-reviewed article. I wonder if we should just chuck this entirely. --[[User:Kent G. Budge|Kent G. Budge]] ([[User talk:Kent G. Budge|talk]]) 21:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)


== Usage - household products ==
== ´Other deposits´: (Germany) Neuburger Kieselerde ==


Shouldn't we include a section of how DE is being used more and more in home products because of how it can be made into a solid slab-like material that rapidly wicks away moisture? In particular bath mats and kitchen scooping spoons [[User:EdwinAmi|EdwinAmi]] ([[User talk:EdwinAmi|talk]]) 06:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
In german, not in english, therefor with the translation to english: <br>
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuburger_Kieselerde to english <br>
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNeuburger_Kieselerde<br>
--[[User:Visionhelp|Visionhelp]] ([[User talk:Visionhelp|talk]]) 16:53, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


:OK, I've added a section for that. Do I need a reference for proof? Like, these are products that exist out there, and like I just know about them. How would you cite for the fact that a kind of product just exists out there in the world made by various different manufacturers? [[User:EdwinAmi|EdwinAmi]] ([[User talk:EdwinAmi|talk]]) 04:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
== ´External link´(at least): differences between (germans) ´Kieselgu(h)r´ to ´Kieselerde´ ==
::How? Google it, try "diatomaceaous earth bath mat" and so on. (And fix a bit of language.) [[User:Ponken|Ponken]] ([[User talk:Ponken|talk]]) 07:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
:::like... a link to the google search, with all the results? Is that an appropriate reference according to wikipedia rules? [[User:EdwinAmi|EdwinAmi]] ([[User talk:EdwinAmi|talk]]) 04:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
::::Of course not. You search to find sources. The "like I just know about them", ''that'' is not a source. And the search I suggested turns up a good source (reputable newspaper). [[User:Ponken|Ponken]] ([[User talk:Ponken|talk]]) 10:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)


== move page to Diatomite (most languages just refer to it as the equivalent of "diatomite" and it's a name more consistent with other materials) ==
Found in german a beautiful description about the very differences of ´Kieselgu(h)r´ and ´Kieselerde´. (Sadnessly in addition: Of both words the translation to english does not work exact and well enough, sorry, and makes extra confusion, which I also can not really help this currently. Sadnessly also the english articles to these are not meeting those differences exactly, I fear. <br>
But I imagine, there MUST be an english word for these ´pebble-algas´.) <br>
(German) https://www.kieselgurwissen.de/kieselgur-und-kieselerde/ (translation to english) <br>
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kieselgurwissen.de%2Fkieselgur-und-kieselerde%2F<br>


if someone could please move the page to "Diatomite" that would be good, because i cannot find the move button as i do not have the "tools" button anywhere thus no point of reference to find the move button from [[User:Tygical|Tygical]] ([[User talk:Tygical|talk]]) 08:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
To look at it oneself, here the links and the links with to english translations. <br>
:I believe that the title of the article should remain '''Diatomaceous earth''' per [[WP:COMMONNAME]] since that is the more common name. A verbatim Google search shows 4.3 million hits for "diatomaceous earth" and 2.2 million for "diatomite". I have therefore reverted your changes to the article until they can be discussed and consensus determined. [[User:CodeTalker|CodeTalker]] ([[User talk:CodeTalker|talk]]) 18:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
*(german) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kieselalgen <br> (english) http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FKieselalgen <br>
*(german) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kieselgur <br> (english) http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FKieselgur <br>
*(german) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kieselerde <br> (english) http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FKieselerde <br>
--[[User:Visionhelp|Visionhelp]] ([[User talk:Visionhelp|talk]]) 11:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:08, 1 January 2025

Confusion regarding safety for humans.

[edit]

On the webpage selling "Garden Safe Diatomaceous Earth 4-lb Insect Killer" you see in caps OUTDOOR:

https://www.lowes.com/pd/Garden-Safe-Garden-Safe-Brand-Crawling-Insect-Killer-Containing-Diatomaceous-Earth-4-Pounds/5005382579

but then you see in the Overview:

Use INDOORS and OUTDOORS: Apply a thin layer of dust to areas where crawling insects live and hide

But in an answer to a question: Can use this product in the same room as my cat?

The answer is: This product is not for indoor use as this is for outdoor use only.

But under features:

For Use in Kitchens/Bathrooms - YES

Maybe they were talking about outhouses and barbecue pits?

And this is only the beginning of the problem. This confusion is over the definitions of: SiO2/silicon dioxide/silica, DE, crystalline silica, amorphous, colloidal, garden grade, food grade, feed grade, impurities, salt vs fresh water, toxic levels, Primary Active Ingredient, silica gel and so on.

But the primary problem is the warning "Do Not Inhale". Given the massive use of DE in and around the home, the question is simple, is it safe? If it is so destructive to insects, then what does it do to my lungs? The mixed message on this webpage is like watching two idiots on Fox News say, "If you want to wear a mask, that's cool. If you don't want to wear a mask, that's cool."

So, please, somebody do the research of popular DE products being sold to homes and find out what is safe, if any.

Thanks. Fair Use 36 (talk) 21:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to primarily be a complaint about the Lowes.com website, not a suggestion for improvements to this article, specifically. Wikipedia isn't a 'how to' or 'guide' for use of commercial products. It would not be within scope to present a listing of commercial diatomacaceous earth products declaring which are safe or unsafe. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 22:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've used a great lot of DE over my 81 years, and in response to the comments and questions above by Fair Use 36 here: There is really no such thing as indoor rather than outdoor DE. Aside from the difference between DE from different areas around the world there are only two grades: Food grade, and all other. The difference between Food grade is nothing more than it's being clean, and ground a little finer than the "all others." I have used both grades internally and externally with approximately the same results, none of which resulted in any problem.

As far as use goes, I have used DE both on my many animals, my wife and children, and no less than several neighbors quite successfully, internally, to kill various parasites, probably 95% being tape worms. I can't speak to the lungs question past that we all have been conscious of the possible risk, and therefore careful not to breath in any more than necessary, though some is inevitable.

For both internal and external use on animals, fleas, ticks, lice, and etc. do fall prey to DE, but nothing like as easily as many online sites like to claim. I am always careful not to overdose, using body weight for the only criteria, and yet dose quantity seems to be of far less importance than keeping the dosing regular in timing of no more than once per day, and no less that once per three days, for no less than three doses and no more than for 12 doses in a row. The reason for this regimen is that I've experienced tape worms dying out in one single dose, given to a very young kitten that likely would have died otherwise, yet the majority of tape worm cures, regardless of the patient's size, took at least the middle dosage time and quantity of once every third day until a minimum of 9 doses was given. The hardest ones are cats and dogs, simply because they lick their anus, and therefore constantly resupply the intestines with both the fresh live segment worms and the semi-dried encapsulated segments. Of course you must kill the adult(s) first, which is the hardest part, but then you must also keep on dosing past the very last intake of both the tape worm segments, and the fleas that carry them. Thus you must kill the external parasites, AND the internal ones, or success may not come at all.

Outside, as in kennel and garden use, DE does work, yes, but the difficulties of wind and weather are Legion, due to the virtual impossibility of getting and keeping a sufficient quantity in place. Keep in mind that DE is useless unless the victim acquires a quantity that causes it to bleed out faster than it washes off, or its body systems plus it's cleanliness habits can remove it. That said, DE in conjunction with methods such as spraying soapy water have allowed me and mine to be totally poison free for more than 4 decades, while at the same time raising an impressive percentage of all our vegetable and animal needs.

Robert Leslie @ this IP address: 174.251.240.123 (talk) 10:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very helpful. 2.27.69.32 (talk) 06:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Usage - household products

[edit]

Shouldn't we include a section of how DE is being used more and more in home products because of how it can be made into a solid slab-like material that rapidly wicks away moisture? In particular bath mats and kitchen scooping spoons EdwinAmi (talk) 06:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've added a section for that. Do I need a reference for proof? Like, these are products that exist out there, and like I just know about them. How would you cite for the fact that a kind of product just exists out there in the world made by various different manufacturers? EdwinAmi (talk) 04:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How? Google it, try "diatomaceaous earth bath mat" and so on. (And fix a bit of language.) Ponken (talk) 07:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
like... a link to the google search, with all the results? Is that an appropriate reference according to wikipedia rules? EdwinAmi (talk) 04:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course not. You search to find sources. The "like I just know about them", that is not a source. And the search I suggested turns up a good source (reputable newspaper). Ponken (talk) 10:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

move page to Diatomite (most languages just refer to it as the equivalent of "diatomite" and it's a name more consistent with other materials)

[edit]

if someone could please move the page to "Diatomite" that would be good, because i cannot find the move button as i do not have the "tools" button anywhere thus no point of reference to find the move button from Tygical (talk) 08:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the title of the article should remain Diatomaceous earth per WP:COMMONNAME since that is the more common name. A verbatim Google search shows 4.3 million hits for "diatomaceous earth" and 2.2 million for "diatomite". I have therefore reverted your changes to the article until they can be discussed and consensus determined. CodeTalker (talk) 18:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]