Talk:Diatomaceous earth: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
CodeTalker (talk | contribs) |
||
(64 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
|||
{{WikiProject Soil|importance=mid }} |
|||
{{WikiProject Geology |
{{WikiProject Geology |
||
|class=Start |
|||
|importance=Low |
|importance=Low |
||
|attention= |
|attention= |
||
|needs-infobox= |
|needs-infobox= |
||
|peer-review= |
|peer-review= |
||
|old-peer-review= |
|old-peer-review= }} |
||
{{WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health|importance=low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
| algo=old(365d) |
|||
| archive=Talk:Diatomaceous earth/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
| counter=1 |
|||
| maxarchivesize=75K |
|||
| archiveheader={{Aan}} |
|||
| minthreadsleft=1 |
|||
| minthreadstoarchive=1 |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
== Confusion regarding safety for humans. == |
|||
==Wording change for clarity== |
|||
This sentence, "Natural diatomaceous earth (freshwater) is preferred by many researchers over chromic oxide, which has been widely used for the same purpose, but which is also a known carcinogen and therefore a potential hazard to research personnel." has some ambiguity. Which type is a carcinogen? |
|||
Try this, "Natural diatomaceous earth (freshwater) is preferred by many researchers over chromic oxide, which has been widely used for the same purpose, because chromic oxide is also a known carcinogen and therefore a potential hazard to research personnel." |
|||
Or try this, "Natural diatomaceous earth (freshwater) is preferred by many researchers over chromic oxide, which has been widely used for the same purpose, because natural diatomaceous earth (freshwater) is also a known carcinogen and therefore a potential hazard to research personnel." |
|||
My ignorance made it necessary to submit both wordings. That I had to submit both wordings demonstrates the problem with the original wording. |
|||
==Untitled== |
|||
Some text in this article has been merged from [[Kieselguhr]]. See the history of that page for authorship record. |
|||
---- |
|||
Someone might want to put something in here about diatomaceous earth as a pest repellant.. |
|||
---- |
|||
The sudden usage of the term 'Kieselgur' is somewhat confusing and out of context. Could someone rewrite this to make the connection a little easier to make? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Etherdave|Etherdave]] ([[User talk:Etherdave|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Etherdave|contribs]]) 20:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Needs expansion== |
|||
This article should say more about the formation of Diatomaceous earth, as well as where it is found, how it is processed, etc. [[User:Zocky|Zocky]] 11:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) |
|||
And perhaps a note on its abundance? How much of this stuff is there on earth? [[User:Mdclxvi|mdclxvi]] 09:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I wonder if there has been any research done on an eventual man-made replacement, since "fossilized remains" are pretty obviously a finite resource. [[User:Diggernet|Diggernet]] ([[User talk:Diggernet|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 22:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
need info about diatomites as reservoir rocks. In California alone, they contain billions of barrels of oil. --[[User:Cmross6|cmross6]] ([[User talk:Cmross6|talk]]) 17:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:It it also one of the ingredients in my bait snare matt paste (hair wax). Probably worth some form of mention in the article that the ingredient can be found in hair products. [[User:Timeshift9|Timeshift]] ([[User talk:Timeshift9|talk]]) 08:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Section 2.4 uses a link that is mere opinion, not remotely creditable. I can't find anything that supports that claim at all using google. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.90.123.177|71.90.123.177]] ([[User talk:71.90.123.177|talk]]) 08:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Coffin-like? == |
|||
''Diatomaceous earth has a high porosity because it is made of microscopically small coffin-like hollow particles.'' - I suppose I can kind of imagine that...but coffin-like in what way? The shape of the particles? [[User:Mithridates|Mithridates]] 15:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, diatomaceous earth is technically composed of skeletons, which at one point contained dead diatom cytoplasm...maybe it was a pun? -- <font color="#668353">[[User:Stillnotelf|stillnotelf]]</font> <font color="#ff4487">[[User talk:Stillnotelf|has a talk page]]</font> 23:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Do people eat it? == |
|||
When used as a parasiticide in animals and people, do they have to ingest this stuff? I have seen some of this (I believe) in a convenience store in a VERY rural area and was told by the clerk that people just called it "white dirt" and bought it to eat, I couldn't imagine why at the time.[[User:72.242.143.24|72.242.143.24]] 23:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
It can be spread in a persons yard to kill fleas. Very cheap and effective. |
|||
: I know that horses have it added to their feed.. AND my roomate and I used it to rid ourselves of bedbugs. VERY effective though it takes a LONG time to clean up and many moppings. (Plus makes you feel rather dry from just being in the environment) [[User:205.233.28.39|205.233.28.39]] 20:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
A lot of people eat this stuff... it is considered to be healthy by many, not just in rural areas. i am suprrised this article does not mention it. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:132.205.103.68|132.205.103.68]] ([[User talk:132.205.103.68|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/132.205.103.68|contribs]]) 00:34, 26 February 2013</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|||
On the webpage selling "Garden Safe Diatomaceous Earth 4-lb Insect Killer" you see in caps OUTDOOR: |
|||
== Are all sources credited? == |
|||
https://www.lowes.com/pd/Garden-Safe-Garden-Safe-Brand-Crawling-Insect-Killer-Containing-Diatomaceous-Earth-4-Pounds/5005382579 |
|||
Much of the material, most noticeably the line about "The most common use (68%) of diatomaceous earth is as a filter medium, especially for swimming pools." also appears at http://www.amigo-business-centre.com/index_bestanden/Page1017.htm |
|||
but then you see in the Overview: |
|||
While it is possible that amigo-business-centre.com got the information from this Wikipedia page, amigo's article seems to be much more complete. |
|||
Use INDOORS and OUTDOORS: Apply a thin layer of dust to areas where crawling insects live and hide |
|||
[[User:Rfreedman|Rich Freedman]] ([[User talk:Rfreedman|talk]]) 18:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
But in an answer to a question: |
|||
---- |
|||
Can use this product in the same room as my cat? |
|||
"bird shit filter" - diatomaceous earth is the washed remains of millions of diatoms eaten by birds and deposited over the millennium usually at the base of cliffs hence the rather nasty sounding name |
|||
The answer is: |
|||
Need references for the geology section. Skeletons of both fresh and saltwater diatoms are composed of amorphous (noncrystalline) silica. Both types can convert to more crystalline forms of silica depending upon depth of burial. In addition, crystalline silica (eg quartz) may be deposited along with diatoms in both environments. The amount of this cystalline silica detritus depends on the proximity to the paleo shoreline along with relationship to steams, rivers, fans, and other slope deposits. --[[User:Cmross6|cmross6]] ([[User talk:Cmross6|talk]]) 17:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
This product is not for indoor use as this is for outdoor use only. |
|||
But under features: |
|||
== Pronounciation == |
|||
For Use in Kitchens/Bathrooms - YES |
|||
Am I the only one who thought this was pronounced /ˌdaɪ'''a'''təˈmeɪʃəs ˈɝθ/ or /ˌdaɪ'''a'''t'''ɒ'''ˈmeɪʃəs ˈɝθ/ ? |
|||
— DIV, Melbourne ([[Special:Contributions/128.250.80.15|128.250.80.15]] ([[User talk:128.250.80.15|talk]]) 04:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)) |
|||
:Maybe it's a Strine vs. Merican thing. At my end of the world, any unstressed syllable is as likely to be pronounced /ə/ as not. |
|||
Maybe they were talking about outhouses and barbecue pits? |
|||
== As a Food Supplement == |
|||
And this is only the beginning of the problem. This confusion is over the definitions of: SiO2/silicon dioxide/silica, DE, crystalline silica, amorphous, colloidal, garden grade, food grade, feed grade, impurities, salt vs fresh water, toxic levels, Primary Active Ingredient, silica gel and so on. |
|||
Some vitamin providers are promoting D.E. as a food supplement. If you read their ads (see www.earthworkshealth.com) it can cure just about everything: arthritis to constipation, skin problems, etc. They sell it as "Food Grade" product for humans & pets. |
|||
But the primary problem is the warning "Do Not Inhale". Given the massive use of DE in and around the home, the question is simple, is it safe? If it is so destructive to insects, then what does it do to my lungs? The mixed message on this webpage is like watching two idiots on Fox News say, "If you want to wear a mask, that's cool. If you don't want to wear a mask, that's cool." |
|||
I can understand how it would be helpful to eliminate insects, but I fear powdering my dogs to eliminate his fleas might be dangerous to his lungs, since I am supposed to =wear a mask when opening the container... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.163.91.155|24.163.91.155]] ([[User talk:24.163.91.155|talk]]) 01:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
So, please, somebody do the research of popular DE products being sold to homes and find out what is safe, if any. |
|||
== epidemiological studies == |
|||
Thanks. [[User:Fair Use 36|Fair Use 36]] ([[User talk:Fair Use 36|talk]]) 21:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
We need epidemiological studies into diatomaceous earth progression inside the lungs of animals and humans. |
|||
:This appears to primarily be a complaint about the Lowes.com website, not a suggestion for improvements to this article, specifically. Wikipedia isn't a 'how to' or 'guide' for use of commercial products. It would not be within scope to present a listing of commercial diatomacaceous earth products declaring which are safe or unsafe. cheers. [[User:Anastrophe|anastrophe]], [[User talk:Anastrophe|an editor he is.]] 22:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
I've used a great lot of DE over my 81 years, and in response to the comments and questions above by Fair Use 36 here: There is really no such thing as indoor rather than outdoor DE. Aside from the difference between DE from different areas around the world there are only two grades: Food grade, and all other. The difference between Food grade is nothing more than it's being clean, and ground a little finer than the "all others." I have used both grades internally and externally with approximately the same results, none of which resulted in any problem. |
|||
[aside - We need this type of statement for diatomaceous earth that explains its impact on human and animal lungs: Fiberglass passes through lung tissue and is expelled in the urn. Asbestos is too large in diameter and lodges in lung tissue, and the body attacks it which damages the lung tissue.] |
|||
As far as use goes, I have used DE both on my many animals, my wife and children, and no less than several neighbors quite successfully, internally, to kill various parasites, probably 95% being tape worms. I can't speak to the lungs question past that we all have been conscious of the possible risk, and therefore careful not to breath in any more than necessary, though some is inevitable. |
|||
For both internal and external use on animals, fleas, ticks, lice, and etc. do fall prey to DE, but nothing like as easily as many online sites like to claim. I am always careful not to overdose, using body weight for the only criteria, and yet dose quantity seems to be of far less importance than keeping the dosing regular in timing of no more than once per day, and no less that once per three days, for no less than three doses and no more than for 12 doses in a row. The reason for this regimen is that I've experienced tape worms dying out in one single dose, given to a very young kitten that likely would have died otherwise, yet the majority of tape worm cures, regardless of the patient's size, took at least the middle dosage time and quantity of once every third day until a minimum of 9 doses was given. The hardest ones are cats and dogs, simply because they lick their anus, and therefore constantly resupply the intestines with both the fresh live segment worms and the semi-dried encapsulated segments. Of course you must kill the adult(s) first, which is the hardest part, but then you must also keep on dosing past the very last intake of both the tape worm segments, and the fleas that carry them. Thus you must kill the external parasites, AND the internal ones, or success may not come at all. |
|||
I found a limited number of references to diatomaceous earth in lung tissue and if others agree, we should cite them. |
|||
[[User:Sponsion|Sponsion]] ([[User talk:Sponsion|talk]]) 17:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Outside, as in kennel and garden use, DE does work, yes, but the difficulties of wind and weather are Legion, due to the virtual impossibility of getting and keeping a sufficient quantity in place. Keep in mind that DE is useless unless the victim acquires a quantity that causes it to bleed out faster than it washes off, or its body systems plus it's cleanliness habits can remove it. That said, DE in conjunction with methods such as spraying soapy water have allowed me and mine to be totally poison free for more than 4 decades, while at the same time raising an impressive percentage of all our vegetable and animal needs. |
|||
== Awful source. == |
|||
Robert Leslie @ this IP address: [[Special:Contributions/174.251.240.123|174.251.240.123]] ([[User talk:174.251.240.123|talk]]) 10:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Source 9 is currently a garbage source. Suggest http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~fieldspg/fields/de-test-p.pdf, which contains the same information (explanation of how DE kills insects) |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/68.30.168.158|68.30.168.158]] ([[User talk:68.30.168.158|talk]]) 20:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you, very helpful. [[Special:Contributions/2.27.69.32|2.27.69.32]] ([[User talk:2.27.69.32|talk]]) 06:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: Agreed. More significantly, however, the Wikipedia article doesn't even summarize that "garbage source" accurately. Reading the reference suggested above, I note that its explanation of the mechanism by which diatomaceous earth kills insects is at odds with the usual explanation, to wit, that it abrades (not absorbs) the waxy layer preventing water loss through the insect exoskeleton. I won't even hazard a guess which explanation is correct without further research, so for the moment will leave the article untouched.[[User:Floozybackloves|Floozybackloves]] ([[User talk:Floozybackloves|talk]]) 02:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Usage - household products == |
|||
== [[:File:Diatomaceous Earth BrightField.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon == |
|||
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that [[:File:Diatomaceous Earth BrightField.jpg]] will be appearing as [[Wikipedia:picture of the day|picture of the day]] on March 2, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at [[Template:POTD/2012-03-02]]. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the [[Main Page]] so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">—'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C;">howcheng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 18:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC) <!-- substituted from [[Template:UpcomingPOTD]] --> |
|||
{{POTD/2012-03-02}} |
|||
Shouldn't we include a section of how DE is being used more and more in home products because of how it can be made into a solid slab-like material that rapidly wicks away moisture? In particular bath mats and kitchen scooping spoons [[User:EdwinAmi|EdwinAmi]] ([[User talk:EdwinAmi|talk]]) 06:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Fulling/filling == |
|||
:OK, I've added a section for that. Do I need a reference for proof? Like, these are products that exist out there, and like I just know about them. How would you cite for the fact that a kind of product just exists out there in the world made by various different manufacturers? [[User:EdwinAmi|EdwinAmi]] ([[User talk:EdwinAmi|talk]]) 04:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
A [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Diatomaceous_earth&diff=511221067&oldid=508800936 recent edit] suggests that "filling", not "fulling", was meant. Diatomaceous earth can be used for filtration in a way similar to [[fuller's earth]] (which was originally used for fulling wool); this might be the source of confusion. In the context of the article, I think "filtering" was what was meant.--[[User:Curtis Clark|Curtis Clark]] ([[User talk:Curtis Clark|talk]]) 18:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::How? Google it, try "diatomaceaous earth bath mat" and so on. (And fix a bit of language.) [[User:Ponken|Ponken]] ([[User talk:Ponken|talk]]) 07:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Although diatomaceous earth can be used for filtering, I think "filling" makes much more sense in the context of the sentence. Paints, soaps and detergents typically need some type of inert material in their formulations to adjust properties such as viscosity, texture, etc. [[User:Deli nk|Deli nk]] ([[User talk:Deli nk|talk]]) 18:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:: |
:::like... a link to the google search, with all the results? Is that an appropriate reference according to wikipedia rules? [[User:EdwinAmi|EdwinAmi]] ([[User talk:EdwinAmi|talk]]) 04:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
::: |
::::Of course not. You search to find sources. The "like I just know about them", ''that'' is not a source. And the search I suggested turns up a good source (reputable newspaper). [[User:Ponken|Ponken]] ([[User talk:Ponken|talk]]) 10:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
== move page to Diatomite (most languages just refer to it as the equivalent of "diatomite" and it's a name more consistent with other materials) == |
|||
== Change of absorption to adsorption == |
|||
if someone could please move the page to "Diatomite" that would be good, because i cannot find the move button as i do not have the "tools" button anywhere thus no point of reference to find the move button from [[User:Tygical|Tygical]] ([[User talk:Tygical|talk]]) 08:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
I suggest changing all occurences of the word "absorption" to "adsorption" because adsorption is taking place in all the described processes. Adsorption = binding of liquid/gas on the surface of sorbent, while absorption = taking up a substance into the volume of sorbent. |
|||
:I believe that the title of the article should remain '''Diatomaceous earth''' per [[WP:COMMONNAME]] since that is the more common name. A verbatim Google search shows 4.3 million hits for "diatomaceous earth" and 2.2 million for "diatomite". I have therefore reverted your changes to the article until they can be discussed and consensus determined. [[User:CodeTalker|CodeTalker]] ([[User talk:CodeTalker|talk]]) 18:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:Vlachj|Vlachj]] ([[User talk:Vlachj|talk]]) 04:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:08, 1 January 2025
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diatomaceous earth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Confusion regarding safety for humans.
[edit]On the webpage selling "Garden Safe Diatomaceous Earth 4-lb Insect Killer" you see in caps OUTDOOR:
but then you see in the Overview:
Use INDOORS and OUTDOORS: Apply a thin layer of dust to areas where crawling insects live and hide
But in an answer to a question: Can use this product in the same room as my cat?
The answer is: This product is not for indoor use as this is for outdoor use only.
But under features:
For Use in Kitchens/Bathrooms - YES
Maybe they were talking about outhouses and barbecue pits?
And this is only the beginning of the problem. This confusion is over the definitions of: SiO2/silicon dioxide/silica, DE, crystalline silica, amorphous, colloidal, garden grade, food grade, feed grade, impurities, salt vs fresh water, toxic levels, Primary Active Ingredient, silica gel and so on.
But the primary problem is the warning "Do Not Inhale". Given the massive use of DE in and around the home, the question is simple, is it safe? If it is so destructive to insects, then what does it do to my lungs? The mixed message on this webpage is like watching two idiots on Fox News say, "If you want to wear a mask, that's cool. If you don't want to wear a mask, that's cool."
So, please, somebody do the research of popular DE products being sold to homes and find out what is safe, if any.
Thanks. Fair Use 36 (talk) 21:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- This appears to primarily be a complaint about the Lowes.com website, not a suggestion for improvements to this article, specifically. Wikipedia isn't a 'how to' or 'guide' for use of commercial products. It would not be within scope to present a listing of commercial diatomacaceous earth products declaring which are safe or unsafe. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 22:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
I've used a great lot of DE over my 81 years, and in response to the comments and questions above by Fair Use 36 here: There is really no such thing as indoor rather than outdoor DE. Aside from the difference between DE from different areas around the world there are only two grades: Food grade, and all other. The difference between Food grade is nothing more than it's being clean, and ground a little finer than the "all others." I have used both grades internally and externally with approximately the same results, none of which resulted in any problem.
As far as use goes, I have used DE both on my many animals, my wife and children, and no less than several neighbors quite successfully, internally, to kill various parasites, probably 95% being tape worms. I can't speak to the lungs question past that we all have been conscious of the possible risk, and therefore careful not to breath in any more than necessary, though some is inevitable.
For both internal and external use on animals, fleas, ticks, lice, and etc. do fall prey to DE, but nothing like as easily as many online sites like to claim. I am always careful not to overdose, using body weight for the only criteria, and yet dose quantity seems to be of far less importance than keeping the dosing regular in timing of no more than once per day, and no less that once per three days, for no less than three doses and no more than for 12 doses in a row. The reason for this regimen is that I've experienced tape worms dying out in one single dose, given to a very young kitten that likely would have died otherwise, yet the majority of tape worm cures, regardless of the patient's size, took at least the middle dosage time and quantity of once every third day until a minimum of 9 doses was given. The hardest ones are cats and dogs, simply because they lick their anus, and therefore constantly resupply the intestines with both the fresh live segment worms and the semi-dried encapsulated segments. Of course you must kill the adult(s) first, which is the hardest part, but then you must also keep on dosing past the very last intake of both the tape worm segments, and the fleas that carry them. Thus you must kill the external parasites, AND the internal ones, or success may not come at all.
Outside, as in kennel and garden use, DE does work, yes, but the difficulties of wind and weather are Legion, due to the virtual impossibility of getting and keeping a sufficient quantity in place. Keep in mind that DE is useless unless the victim acquires a quantity that causes it to bleed out faster than it washes off, or its body systems plus it's cleanliness habits can remove it. That said, DE in conjunction with methods such as spraying soapy water have allowed me and mine to be totally poison free for more than 4 decades, while at the same time raising an impressive percentage of all our vegetable and animal needs.
Robert Leslie @ this IP address: 174.251.240.123 (talk) 10:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, very helpful. 2.27.69.32 (talk) 06:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Usage - household products
[edit]Shouldn't we include a section of how DE is being used more and more in home products because of how it can be made into a solid slab-like material that rapidly wicks away moisture? In particular bath mats and kitchen scooping spoons EdwinAmi (talk) 06:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I've added a section for that. Do I need a reference for proof? Like, these are products that exist out there, and like I just know about them. How would you cite for the fact that a kind of product just exists out there in the world made by various different manufacturers? EdwinAmi (talk) 04:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- How? Google it, try "diatomaceaous earth bath mat" and so on. (And fix a bit of language.) Ponken (talk) 07:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- like... a link to the google search, with all the results? Is that an appropriate reference according to wikipedia rules? EdwinAmi (talk) 04:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Of course not. You search to find sources. The "like I just know about them", that is not a source. And the search I suggested turns up a good source (reputable newspaper). Ponken (talk) 10:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- like... a link to the google search, with all the results? Is that an appropriate reference according to wikipedia rules? EdwinAmi (talk) 04:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- How? Google it, try "diatomaceaous earth bath mat" and so on. (And fix a bit of language.) Ponken (talk) 07:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
move page to Diatomite (most languages just refer to it as the equivalent of "diatomite" and it's a name more consistent with other materials)
[edit]if someone could please move the page to "Diatomite" that would be good, because i cannot find the move button as i do not have the "tools" button anywhere thus no point of reference to find the move button from Tygical (talk) 08:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I believe that the title of the article should remain Diatomaceous earth per WP:COMMONNAME since that is the more common name. A verbatim Google search shows 4.3 million hits for "diatomaceous earth" and 2.2 million for "diatomite". I have therefore reverted your changes to the article until they can be discussed and consensus determined. CodeTalker (talk) 18:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- B-Class Soil articles
- Mid-importance Soil articles
- WikiProject Soil articles
- B-Class Geology articles
- Low-importance Geology articles
- Low-importance B-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- B-Class Occupational Safety and Health articles
- Low-importance Occupational Safety and Health articles
- WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health articles