Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lam312321321: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Comment, marking case as closed (using spihelper.js) Tag: Reverted |
Comment, marking case as closed (using spihelper.js) |
||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|Lam312321321}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|Lam312321321}} |
||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===30 August 2024=== |
|||
===01 January 2025=== |
|||
{{SPI case status|close}} |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
{{sock list|1= |
{{sock list|1=Bruntmelonslash|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
||
Same as the recent IP socking, including the exact same longstanding edit attempt to [[Culture of England]] of removing a lead photo of York Morris dancers and instead adding a particular photo of Midhurst Morris dancers to a paragraph about folklore. ([https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Culture_of_England&diff=prev&oldid=1241300075], [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Culture_of_England&diff=prev&oldid=1243013888]) |
|||
This freshly created account's first six contributions have all been replays from the repertoire of its predecessor, {{user|Musicinvasion}}. I'll block the duck on behavior, but previous cases indicate the need for a sleeper sweep. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 19:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Requesting checkuser per past use of sleeper accounts. [[User:Belbury|Belbury]] ([[User talk:Belbury|talk]]) 08:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
* |
* Did catch one, {{checkuser|Historianfollower}}. Should have seen it the other day. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 19:35, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 1 January 2025
Lam312321321
Lam312321321 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lam312321321/Archive.
01 January 2025
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Bruntmelonslash (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
This freshly created account's first six contributions have all been replays from the repertoire of its predecessor, Musicinvasion (talk · contribs). I'll block the duck on behavior, but previous cases indicate the need for a sleeper sweep. Favonian (talk) 19:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Did catch one, Historianfollower (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Should have seen it the other day. Izno (talk) 19:35, 1 January 2025 (UTC)