Jump to content

The Romantic Manifesto: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Contents: section title improvement
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|1969 book by Ayn Rand}}
{{Infobox book
{{Infobox book
|name = The Romantic Manifesto
|name = The Romantic Manifesto
Line 19: Line 20:
|oclc = 61543
|oclc = 61543
}}
}}
'''''The Romantic Manifesto: A Philosophy of Literature''''' is a [[non-fiction]] work by [[Ayn Rand]], a collection of essays regarding the nature of [[art]]. It was first published in 1969, with a second, revised edition published in 1975.
'''''The Romantic Manifesto: A Philosophy of Literature''''' is a collection of essays regarding the nature of [[art]] by the philosopher [[Ayn Rand]]. It was first published in 1969, with a second, revised edition published in 1975. Most of the essays are reprinted from Rand's magazine ''[[The Objectivist]]''.


==Summary==
==Publishing history==
Most of the essays in the book originally appeared in ''[[The Objectivist]]'', except for the "Introduction to [[Ninety-Three]]", which was an introduction for an edition of the [[Victor Hugo]] novel. The first edition of the book, published by The [[World Publishing Company]] in 1969,<ref>{{harvnb|Perinn|1990|p=36}}</ref> was Rand's first book to be published after her break with her former protégé [[Nathaniel Branden]], and unlike her two previous essay collections it did not contain material by Branden or any other authors besides Rand.<ref>{{harvnb|Baker|1987|p=85}}</ref> A paperback edition was published by [[New American Library]] in 1971.<ref>{{harvnb|Perinn|1990|p=37}}</ref> The revised edition in 1975 added the essay "Art and Cognition".<ref>{{harvnb|Gladstein|1999|p=84}}</ref>

==Content==
At the base of her argument, Rand asserts that one cannot create art without infusing a given work with one's own value judgments and personal philosophy. Even if the artist attempts to withhold moral overtones, the work becomes tinged with a deterministic or naturalistic message. The next logical step of Rand's argument is that the audience of any particular work cannot help but come away with some sense of a philosophical message, colored by his or her own personal values, ingrained into their psyche by whatever degree of emotional impact the work holds for them.
At the base of her argument, Rand asserts that one cannot create art without infusing a given work with one's own value judgments and personal philosophy. Even if the artist attempts to withhold moral overtones, the work becomes tinged with a deterministic or naturalistic message. The next logical step of Rand's argument is that the audience of any particular work cannot help but come away with some sense of a philosophical message, colored by his or her own personal values, ingrained into their psyche by whatever degree of emotional impact the work holds for them.


Rand goes on to divide artistic endeavors into "valid" and "invalid" forms. ([[Photography]], for example, is invalid to her (qua art form) because a camera merely records the world exactly as it is and has very limited, if any, capacity to carry a moral message beyond the photographer's choice of subject matter.) Art, to her, should always strive to elevate and idealize the human spirit. She specifically attacks [[Naturalism (art)|Naturalism]] and [[Modernism]] in art, while upholding [[Romanticism]] (in the artistic sense, which Rand distinguishes from the philosophy also called Romanticism, which she strongly opposed).
Rand goes on to divide artistic endeavors into "valid" and "invalid" forms. [[Photography]], for example, is invalid to her (qua art form) because a camera merely records the world exactly as it is and has very limited, if any, capacity to carry a moral message beyond the photographer's choice of subject matter. Art, to her, should always strive to elevate and idealize the human spirit. She specifically attacks [[Naturalism (art)|Naturalism]] and [[Modernism]] in art, while upholding [[Romanticism]] (in the artistic sense, which Rand distinguishes from the philosophy also called Romanticism, which she strongly opposed).


The first eleven of the book's twelve chapters were essays originally written for periodicals and an introduction to an edition of Victor Hugo, the final chapter is a [[short story]] entitled "The Simplest Thing in the World".
The first eleven of the book's twelve chapters were essays originally written for periodicals and an introduction to an edition of Victor Hugo. The final chapter is a [[short story]] entitled "The Simplest Thing in the World".

==Publication history==
Most of the essays in the book originally appeared in ''[[The Objectivist]]'', except for the "Introduction to [[Ninety-Three]]", which was an introduction for an English-language edition of the [[Victor Hugo]] novel. The first edition of ''The Romantic Manifesto'' was published by The [[World Publishing Company]] in 1969.{{sfn|Perinn|1990|p=36}} It was Rand's first book to be published after her break with her former protégé [[Nathaniel Branden]], and unlike her two previous essay collections it did not contain material by Branden or any other authors besides Rand.{{sfn|Baker|1987|p=85}} A paperback edition was published by [[New American Library]] in 1971.{{sfn|Perinn|1990|p=37}} The revised edition in 1975 added the essay "Art and Cognition".{{sfn|Gladstein|1999|p=84}}


==Reception==
==Reception==
Upon its initial release, ''The Romantic Manifesto'' received only a few reviews. Most of these were brief and negative, and even the longer reviews paid little attention to the details of Rand's aesthetic theory.<ref>{{harvnb|Kamhi|Torres|2000|pp=2–4}}</ref> From then until the late 1990s, ''The Romantic Manifesto'' and Rand's aesthetic theory in general received little attention, leading Rand scholar [[Chris Matthew Sciabarra]] to refer to it as "a nearly forgotten book in the Randian canon".<ref>{{harvnb|Sciabarra|1998|p=144}}</ref> One of the few exceptions was a 1986 journal article by literature professor [[Stephen D. Cox]], in which he contrasted Rand's formal aesthetic theory from the book with her own practices as an author of fiction, arguing that her practice contradicted some of her theoretical points.<ref>{{harvnb|Cox|1986}}</ref> Another exception was a chapter on Rand's aesthetics in ''[[Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand]]'', a detailed presentation of her ideas by her friend and heir [[Leonard Peikoff]].<ref>{{harvnb|Peikoff|1991|pp=413–450}}</ref> Overall this period was described by one later critic as a time of "benign neglect", when even Rand's admirers wrote little about her ideas on art.<ref>{{harvnb|Lipp|2007|pp=144, 151n.8}}</ref>
Upon its initial release, ''The Romantic Manifesto'' received only a few reviews. Most of these were brief and negative, and even the longer reviews paid little attention to the details of Rand's aesthetic theory.{{sfn|Kamhi|Torres|2000|pp=2–4}} From then until the late 1990s, ''The Romantic Manifesto'' and Rand's aesthetic theory in general received little attention, leading Rand scholar [[Chris Matthew Sciabarra]] to refer to it as "a nearly forgotten book in the Randian canon".{{sfn|Sciabarra|1998|p=144}} One of the few exceptions was a 1986 journal article by literature professor [[Stephen D. Cox]], in which he contrasted Rand's formal aesthetic theory from the book with her own practices as an author of fiction, arguing that her practice contradicted some of her theoretical points.{{sfn|Cox|1986}} Another exception was a chapter on Rand's aesthetics in ''[[Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand]]'', a detailed presentation of her ideas by her friend and heir [[Leonard Peikoff]].{{sfn|Peikoff|1991|pp=413–450}} Overall this period was described by one later critic as a time of "benign neglect", when even Rand's admirers wrote little about her ideas on art.{{sfn|Lipp|2007|pp=144, 151n.8}}


Literature professor [[Mimi Reisel Gladstein]] described the book as "perhaps the most unified and coherent of Rand's nonfiction works."<ref>{{harvnb|Gladstein|1999|p=82}}</ref> However, historian James Baker contrasted the book with Rand's approach in her book ''[[Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology]]'', most of which was written as a single work. Baker described ''The Romantic Manifesto'' as lacking the "systematic" approach of the other book.<ref>{{harvnb|Baker|1987|pp=84–85}}</ref> Barry Vacker said that while the book "offers unique and valuable insights", it fails to "present a complete philosophy of fine art."<ref>{{harvnb|Vacker|1999|p=152n.1}}</ref>
[[Mimi Reisel Gladstein]] described the book as "perhaps the most unified and coherent of Rand's nonfiction works."{{sfn|Gladstein|1999|p=82}} However, the historian James T. Baker contrasted the book with Rand's approach in her book ''[[Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology]]'', most of which was written as a single work. Baker described ''The Romantic Manifesto'' as lacking the "systematic" approach of the other book.{{sfn|Baker|1987|pp=84–85}} Barry Vacker said that while the book "offers unique and valuable insights", it fails to "present a complete philosophy of fine art".{{sfn|Vacker|1999|p=152n.1}}


As of 2008, the book had sold over 350,000 copies.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sales of Ayn Rand Books Reach 25&nbsp;million Copies |url=http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=17345 |date=April 7, 2008 |accessdate=July 31, 2009 |publisher=Ayn Rand Institute |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130105130630/http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=17345 |archivedate=January 5, 2013}}</ref>
As of 2008, the book had sold over 350,000 copies.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sales of Ayn Rand Books Reach 25&nbsp;million Copies |url=http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=17345 |date=April 7, 2008 |access-date=July 31, 2009 |publisher=Ayn Rand Institute |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130105130630/http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=17345 |archive-date=January 5, 2013}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 42: Line 43:


===Works cited===
===Works cited===
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |title=Ayn Rand |last=Baker |first=James T. |location=Boston, Massachusetts |publisher=Twayne Publishers |year=1987 |oclc=14933003 |isbn=0-8057-7497-1}}
* {{Cite book |title=Ayn Rand |last=Baker |first=James T. |location=Boston, Massachusetts |publisher=Twayne Publishers |year=1987 |isbn=0-8057-7497-1 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/aynrand0000bake }}
* {{Cite journal |ref=harv |title=Ayn Rand: Theory versus Creative Life |last=Cox |first=Stephen |authorlink=Stephen D. Cox |work=[[The Journal of Libertarian Studies]] |volume=8 |issue=1 |date=Winter 1986 |url=https://www.mises.org/journals/jls/8_1/8_1_2.pdf |pages=19–29}}
* {{Cite journal |title=Ayn Rand: Theory versus Creative Life |last=Cox |first=Stephen |author-link=Stephen D. Cox |work=[[The Journal of Libertarian Studies]] |volume=8 |issue=1 |date=Winter 1986 |url=https://www.mises.org/journals/jls/8_1/8_1_2.pdf |pages=19–29}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |title=The New Ayn Rand Companion |last=Gladstein |first=Mimi Reisel |authorlink=Mimi Reisel Gladstein |location=Westport, Connecticut |publisher=Greenwood Press |year=1999 |isbn=0-313-30321-5 |oclc=40359365}}
* {{Cite book |title=The New Ayn Rand Companion |last=Gladstein |first=Mimi Reisel |author-link=Mimi Reisel Gladstein |location=Westport, Connecticut |publisher=Greenwood Press |year=1999 |isbn=0-313-30321-5}}
* {{Cite journal |ref=harv |title=Critical Neglect of Ayn Rand's Theory of Art |first1=Michelle Marder |last1=Kamhi |first2=Louis |last2=Torres |work=[[The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies]] |volume=2 |issue=1 |date=Fall 2000 |url=http://www.aristos.org/editors/critneg.pdf |pages=1–46 |lastauthoramp=y}}
* {{Cite journal |title=Critical Neglect of Ayn Rand's Theory of Art |first1=Michelle Marder |last1=Kamhi |author-link=Michelle Marder Kamhi |first2=Louis |last2=Torres |work=[[The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies]] |volume=2 |issue=1 |date=Fall 2000 |url=http://www.aristos.org/editors/critneg.pdf |pages=1–46 |name-list-style=amp}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |first=Ronald F. |last=Lipp |chapter=''Atlas'' and Art |title=Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged: A Philosophical and Literary Companion |editor-last=Younkins |editor-first=Edward W |location=Burlington, Vermont |publisher=Ashgate Publishing |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-7546-5533-6 |oclc=69792104 |pages=143–154}}
* {{Cite book |first=Ronald F. |last=Lipp |chapter=''Atlas'' and Art |title=Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged: A Philosophical and Literary Companion |editor-last=Younkins |editor-first=Edward W |location=Burlington, Vermont |publisher=Ashgate Publishing |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-7546-5533-6 |pages=143–154}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |title=[[Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand]] |last=Peikoff |first=Leonard |authorlink=Leonard Peikoff |location=New York |publisher=[[E. P. Dutton|Dutton]] |year=1991 |isbn=0-525-93380-8 |oclc=23647748}}
* {{Cite book |title=[[Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand]] |last=Peikoff |first=Leonard |author-link=Leonard Peikoff |location=New York |publisher=[[E. P. Dutton|Dutton]] |year=1991 |isbn=0-525-93380-8}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |title=Ayn Rand: First Descriptive Bibliography |last=Perinn |first=Vincent L. |location=Rockville, Maryland |publisher=Quill & Brush |year=1990 |isbn=0-9610494-8-0 |oclc=23216055}}
* {{Cite book |title=Ayn Rand: First Descriptive Bibliography |last=Perinn |first=Vincent L. |location=Rockville, Maryland |publisher=Quill & Brush |year=1990 |isbn=0-9610494-8-0}}
* {{Cite journal |ref=harv |title=A Renaissance in Rand Scholarship |first=Chris Matthew |last=Sciabarra |authorlink=Chris Matthew Sciabarra |work=Reason Papers |issue=23 |date=Fall 1998 |url=http://www.reasonpapers.com/pdf/23/rp_23_16.pdf |pages=132–159}}
* {{Cite journal |title=A Renaissance in Rand Scholarship |first=Chris Matthew |last=Sciabarra |author-link=Chris Matthew Sciabarra |work=Reason Papers |issue=23 |date=Fall 1998 |url=http://www.reasonpapers.com/pdf/23/rp_23_16.pdf |pages=132–159}}
* {{Cite book |ref=harv |first=Barry |last=Vacker |chapter=Skyscrapers, Supermodels, and Strange Attractors: Ayn Rand, Naomi Wolf, and the Third Wave Aesthos |title=Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand |editor1-last=Gladstein |editor1-first=Mimi Reisel |editor2-last=Sciabarra |editor2-first=Chris Matthew |editor1-link=Mimi Reisel Gladstein |editor2-link=Chris Matthew Sciabarra |location=University Park, Pennsylvania |publisher=Pennsylvania State University Press |year=1999 |isbn=0-271-01830-5 |series=Re-reading the Canon |chapterurl=http://www.barryvacker.net/pdfs/7skyscrapersupermod.pdf |lastauthoramp=y |pages=115–156}}
* {{Cite book |first=Barry |last=Vacker |chapter=Skyscrapers, Supermodels, and Strange Attractors: Ayn Rand, Naomi Wolf, and the Third Wave Aesthos |title=Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand |editor1-last=Gladstein |editor1-first=Mimi Reisel |editor2-last=Sciabarra |editor2-first=Chris Matthew |editor1-link=Mimi Reisel Gladstein |editor2-link=Chris Matthew Sciabarra |location=University Park, Pennsylvania |publisher=Pennsylvania State University Press |year=1999 |isbn=0-271-01830-5 |series=Re-reading the Canon |chapter-url=http://www.barryvacker.net/pdfs/7skyscrapersupermod.pdf |name-list-style=amp |pages=115–156}}


{{Ayn Rand|state=autocollapse}}
{{Ayn Rand|state=autocollapse}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Romantic Manifesto, The}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Romantic Manifesto, The}}
[[Category:1969 books]]
[[Category:1969 non-fiction books]]
[[Category:American essay collections]]
[[Category:Art manifestos]]
[[Category:Books about writing]]
[[Category:Books about writing]]
[[Category:Books by Ayn Rand]]
[[Category:Books by Ayn Rand]]
[[Category:English-language books]]
[[Category:English-language non-fiction books]]
[[Category:Essay collections]]
[[Category:Objectivist books]]
[[Category:Objectivist books]]
[[Category:Philosophy books]]
[[Category:Aesthetics books]]
[[Category:Art manifestos]]
[[Category:New American Library books]]

Latest revision as of 10:34, 3 January 2025

The Romantic Manifesto
Cover of the first edition
AuthorAyn Rand
LanguageEnglish
SubjectAesthetics
PublisherNew American Library
Publication date
  • 1969 (1st edition)
  • 1975 (2nd edition)
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (Hardcover and Paperback)
Pages199 (Centennial edition)
ISBN0-451-14916-5 (Centennial edition)
OCLC61543

The Romantic Manifesto: A Philosophy of Literature is a collection of essays regarding the nature of art by the philosopher Ayn Rand. It was first published in 1969, with a second, revised edition published in 1975. Most of the essays are reprinted from Rand's magazine The Objectivist.

Summary

[edit]

At the base of her argument, Rand asserts that one cannot create art without infusing a given work with one's own value judgments and personal philosophy. Even if the artist attempts to withhold moral overtones, the work becomes tinged with a deterministic or naturalistic message. The next logical step of Rand's argument is that the audience of any particular work cannot help but come away with some sense of a philosophical message, colored by his or her own personal values, ingrained into their psyche by whatever degree of emotional impact the work holds for them.

Rand goes on to divide artistic endeavors into "valid" and "invalid" forms. Photography, for example, is invalid to her (qua art form) because a camera merely records the world exactly as it is and has very limited, if any, capacity to carry a moral message beyond the photographer's choice of subject matter. Art, to her, should always strive to elevate and idealize the human spirit. She specifically attacks Naturalism and Modernism in art, while upholding Romanticism (in the artistic sense, which Rand distinguishes from the philosophy also called Romanticism, which she strongly opposed).

The first eleven of the book's twelve chapters were essays originally written for periodicals and an introduction to an edition of Victor Hugo. The final chapter is a short story entitled "The Simplest Thing in the World".

Publication history

[edit]

Most of the essays in the book originally appeared in The Objectivist, except for the "Introduction to Ninety-Three", which was an introduction for an English-language edition of the Victor Hugo novel. The first edition of The Romantic Manifesto was published by The World Publishing Company in 1969.[1] It was Rand's first book to be published after her break with her former protégé Nathaniel Branden, and unlike her two previous essay collections it did not contain material by Branden or any other authors besides Rand.[2] A paperback edition was published by New American Library in 1971.[3] The revised edition in 1975 added the essay "Art and Cognition".[4]

Reception

[edit]

Upon its initial release, The Romantic Manifesto received only a few reviews. Most of these were brief and negative, and even the longer reviews paid little attention to the details of Rand's aesthetic theory.[5] From then until the late 1990s, The Romantic Manifesto and Rand's aesthetic theory in general received little attention, leading Rand scholar Chris Matthew Sciabarra to refer to it as "a nearly forgotten book in the Randian canon".[6] One of the few exceptions was a 1986 journal article by literature professor Stephen D. Cox, in which he contrasted Rand's formal aesthetic theory from the book with her own practices as an author of fiction, arguing that her practice contradicted some of her theoretical points.[7] Another exception was a chapter on Rand's aesthetics in Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand, a detailed presentation of her ideas by her friend and heir Leonard Peikoff.[8] Overall this period was described by one later critic as a time of "benign neglect", when even Rand's admirers wrote little about her ideas on art.[9]

Mimi Reisel Gladstein described the book as "perhaps the most unified and coherent of Rand's nonfiction works."[10] However, the historian James T. Baker contrasted the book with Rand's approach in her book Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, most of which was written as a single work. Baker described The Romantic Manifesto as lacking the "systematic" approach of the other book.[11] Barry Vacker said that while the book "offers unique and valuable insights", it fails to "present a complete philosophy of fine art".[12]

As of 2008, the book had sold over 350,000 copies.[13]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Perinn 1990, p. 36.
  2. ^ Baker 1987, p. 85.
  3. ^ Perinn 1990, p. 37.
  4. ^ Gladstein 1999, p. 84.
  5. ^ Kamhi & Torres 2000, pp. 2–4.
  6. ^ Sciabarra 1998, p. 144.
  7. ^ Cox 1986.
  8. ^ Peikoff 1991, pp. 413–450.
  9. ^ Lipp 2007, pp. 144, 151n.8.
  10. ^ Gladstein 1999, p. 82.
  11. ^ Baker 1987, pp. 84–85.
  12. ^ Vacker 1999, p. 152n.1.
  13. ^ "Sales of Ayn Rand Books Reach 25 million Copies". Ayn Rand Institute. April 7, 2008. Archived from the original on January 5, 2013. Retrieved July 31, 2009.

Works cited

[edit]