Jump to content

Minimal model (physics): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m Classification: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes using AWB (8976)
Submodels
 
(74 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Family of solved 2D conformal field theories}}
In [[theoretical physics]], the '''minimal models''' are a very concrete well-defined type of [[rational conformal field theory]]. The individual minimal models are parameterized by two integers ''p,q'' that are moreover related for the unitary minimal models.
In [[theoretical physics]], a '''minimal model''' or '''Virasoro minimal model''' is a [[two-dimensional conformal field theory]] whose spectrum is built from finitely many [[irreducible representation]]s of the [[Virasoro algebra]].
Minimal models have been classified and solved, and found to obey an [[ADE classification]].<ref>A. Cappelli, J-B. Zuber, "A-D-E Classification of Conformal Field Theories", [http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/A-D-E_Classification_of_Conformal_Field_Theories Scholarpedia]</ref>
The term minimal model can also refer to a rational CFT based on an algebra that is larger than the Virasoro algebra, such as a [[W-algebra]].

==Relevant representations of the Virasoro algebra==

===Representations===

In minimal models, the central charge of the [[Virasoro algebra]] takes values of the type
:<math> c_{p,q} = 1 - 6 {(p-q)^2 \over pq}\ .</math>
where <math> p, q </math> are coprime integers such that <math>p,q \geq 2</math>.
Then the conformal dimensions of degenerate representations are
:<math> h_{r,s} = \frac{(pr-qs)^2-(p-q)^2}{4pq}\ , \quad \text{with}\ r,s\in\mathbb{N}^*\ ,</math>
and they obey the identities
:<math> h_{r,s} = h_{q-r,p-s} = h_{r+q,s+p}\ . </math>
The spectrums of minimal models are made of irreducible, degenerate lowest-weight representations of the Virasoro algebra, whose conformal dimensions are of the type <math>h_{r,s}</math> with
:<math> 1\leq r \leq q-1 \quad , \quad 1\leq s \leq p-1\ . </math>
Such a representation <math>\mathcal{R}_{r,s}</math> is a coset of a [[Verma module]] by its infinitely many nontrivial submodules. It is unitary if and only if <math>|p-q|=1</math>. At a given central charge, there are <math>\frac12(p-1)(q-1)</math> distinct representations of this type. The set of these representations, or of their conformal dimensions, is called the '''Kac table''' with parameters <math>(p, q)</math>. The Kac table is usually drawn as a rectangle of size <math>(q-1)\times (p-1)</math>, where each representation appears twice
due to the relation
:<math> \mathcal{R}_{r,s} = \mathcal{R}_{q-r,p-s}\ . </math>

===Fusion rules===

The fusion rules of the multiply degenerate representations <math>\mathcal{R}_{r,s}</math> encode constraints from all their null vectors. They can therefore be deduced from the [[Two-dimensional conformal field theory#Fusion rules|fusion rules]] of simply degenerate representations, which encode constraints from individual null vectors.<ref name = "BYB"/> Explicitly, the fusion rules are
:<math>
\mathcal{R}_{r_1,s_1} \times \mathcal{R}_{r_2,s_2} = \sum_{r_3\overset{2}{=}|r_1-r_2|+1}^{\min(r_1+r_2,2q-r_1-r_2)-1}\ \sum_{s_3\overset{2}{=}|s_1-s_2|+1}^{\min(s_1+s_2,2p-s_1-s_2)-1} \mathcal{R}_{r_3,s_3}\ ,
</math>
where the sums run by increments of two.


==Classification==
==Classification==


Minimal models are the only 2d CFTs that are consistent on any Riemann surface, and are built from finitely many representations of the Virasoro algebra.<ref name="BYB"/> There are many more rational CFTs that are consistent on the sphere only: these CFTs are submodels of minimal models, built from subsets of the Kac table that are closed under fusion. Such submodels can also be classified.<ref name="bcm24"/>
* <math> c = 1 - 6 {(p-q)^2 \over pq}</math>
* <math> h = h_{r,s}(c) = {{(pr-qs)^2-(p-q)^2} \over 4pq}</math>


=== A-series minimal models: the diagonal case ===
These conformal field theories have a finite set of conformal families which close under fusion. However, generally these will not be unitary. Unitarity imposes the further restriction that q and p are related by q=m and p=m+1.


For any coprime integers <math>p,q</math> such that <math>p,q\geq 2</math>, there exists a diagonal minimal model whose spectrum contains one copy of each distinct representation in the Kac table:
:<math> c = 1-{6\over m(m+1)} = 0,\quad 1/2,\quad 7/10,\quad 4/5,\quad 6/7,\quad 25/28, \ldots</math>
:<math> \mathcal{S}_{p,q}^\text{A-series} = \frac12 \bigoplus_{r=1}^{q-1}\bigoplus_{s=1}^{p-1} \mathcal{R}_{r,s}\otimes \bar{\mathcal{R}}_{r,s}\ . </math>
for ''m'' = 2, 3, 4, .... and ''h'' is one of the values
The <math> (p,q)</math> and <math>(q,p)</math> models are the same.
:<math> h = h_{r,s}(c) = {((m+1)r-ms)^2-1 \over 4m(m+1)}</math>
for ''r'' = 1, 2, 3, ..., ''m''&minus;1 and ''s''= 1, 2, 3, ..., ''r''.


The OPE of two fields involves all the fields that are allowed by the fusion rules of the corresponding representations.
The first few minimal models correspond to central charges and dimensions:

*''m'' = 3: ''c'' = 1/2, ''h'' = 0, 1/16, 1/2. These 3 representations are related to the [[Ising model]] at criticality. The three operators correspond to the identity, spin and energy density respectively.
=== D-series minimal models ===
*''m'' = 4: ''c'' = 7/10. ''h'' = 0, 3/80, 1/10, 7/16, 3/5, 3/2. These 6 give the scaling fields of the tri critical [[Ising model]].

*''m'' = 5: ''c'' = 4/5. These give the 10 fields of the 3-state [[Potts model]].
A D-series minimal model with the central charge <math>c_{p,q}</math> exists if <math>p</math> or <math>q</math> is even and at least <math>6</math>. Using the symmetry <math>p\leftrightarrow q</math>
*''m'' = 6: ''c'' = 6/7. These give the 15 fields of the tri critical 3-state [[Potts model]].
we assume that <math>q </math> is even, then <math>p</math> is odd. The spectrum is
:<math>
\mathcal{S}_{p,q}^{\text{D-series}} \ \ \underset{q\equiv 0\operatorname{mod} 4,\ q\geq 8}{=}\ \ \frac12 \bigoplus_{r\overset{2}{=}1}^{q-1} \bigoplus_{s=1}^{p-1} \mathcal{R}_{ r,s} \otimes \bar{\mathcal{R}}_{r,s}\oplus \frac12\bigoplus_{r\overset{2}{=}2}^{q-2} \bigoplus_{s=1}^{p-1} \mathcal{R}_{r,s} \otimes \bar{\mathcal{R}}_{q-r,s}\ ,
</math>
:<math>
\mathcal{S}_{p,q}^{\text{D-series}} \ \ \underset{q\equiv 2\operatorname{mod} 4,\ q\geq 6}{=}\ \ \frac12 \bigoplus_{r\overset{2}{=}1}^{q-1} \bigoplus_{s=1}^{p-1} \mathcal{R}_{ r,s} \otimes \bar{\mathcal{R}}_{r,s}\oplus \frac12\bigoplus_{r\overset{2}{=}1}^{q-1} \bigoplus_{s=1}^{p-1} \mathcal{R}_{r,s} \otimes \bar{\mathcal{R}}_{q-r,s}\ ,
</math>
where the sums over <math>r</math> run by increments of two.
In any given spectrum, each representation has multiplicity one, except the representations of the type <math>\mathcal{R}_{\frac{q}{2},s}\otimes \bar{\mathcal{R}}_{\frac{q}{2},s}</math> if <math>q\equiv 2\ \mathrm{mod}\ 4</math>, which have multiplicity two. These representations indeed appear in both terms in our formula for the spectrum.

The OPE of two fields involves all the fields that are allowed by the fusion rules of the corresponding representations, and that respect the '''conservation of diagonality''': the OPE of one diagonal and one non-diagonal field yields only non-diagonal fields, and the OPE of two fields of the same type yields only diagonal fields.
<ref> I. Runkel, "Structure constants for the D series Virasoro minimal models", [https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9908046 hep-th/9908046]</ref>
For this rule, one copy of the representation <math>\mathcal{R}_{\frac{q}{2},s}\otimes \bar{\mathcal{R}}_{\frac{q}{2},s}</math>
counts as diagonal, and the other copy as non-diagonal.

=== E-series minimal models ===

There are three series of E-series minimal models. Each series exists for a given value of <math>q\in\{12,18,30\},</math> for any <math>p\geq 2</math> that is coprime with <math>q</math>. (This actually implies <math>p\geq 5</math>.) Using the notation <math>|\mathcal{R}|^2 = \mathcal{R}\otimes \bar{\mathcal{R}}</math>, the spectrums read:
:<math> \mathcal{S}^\text{E-series}_{p,12} = \frac12 \bigoplus_{s=1}^{p-1} \left\{
\left| \mathcal{R}_{1,s}\oplus \mathcal{R}_{7,s}\right|^2
\oplus \left| \mathcal{R}_{4,s} \oplus \mathcal{R}_{8,s}\right|^2
\oplus \left| \mathcal{R}_{5,s} \oplus \mathcal{R}_{11,s} \right|^2
\right\}\ ,</math>
:<math> \mathcal{S}^\text{E-series}_{p,18} = \frac12 \bigoplus_{s=1}^{p-1} \left\{ \left|\mathcal{R}_{9,s}\oplus 2\mathcal{R}_{3,s}\right|^2 \ominus 4\left|\mathcal{R}_{3,s}\right|^2 \oplus \bigoplus_{r\in\{1, 5, 7\}} \left|\mathcal{R}_{r,s}\oplus \mathcal{R}_{18-r,s}\right|^2 \right\}\ , </math>
:<math> \mathcal{S}^\text{E-series}_{p,30} = \frac12 \bigoplus_{s=1}^{p-1} \left\{
\left|\bigoplus_{r\in\{1,11,19,29\}} \mathcal{R}_{r,s}\right|^2 \oplus
\left|\bigoplus_{r\in\{7,13,17,23\}} \mathcal{R}_{r,s}\right|^2
\right\}\ . </math>

== Examples ==

The following A-series minimal models are related to well-known physical systems:<ref name="BYB">P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, ''Conformal Field Theory'', 1997, {{ISBN|0-387-94785-X}}</ref>
* <math>(p,q)=(3,2)</math> : trivial CFT,
* <math>(p,q)=(5,2)</math> : Yang-Lee edge singularity,
* <math>(p,q)=(4,3)</math> : [[two-dimensional critical Ising model|critical Ising model]],
* <math>(p,q)=(5,4)</math> : tricritical Ising model,
* <math>(p,q)=(6,5)</math> : tetracritical Ising model.
The following D-series minimal models are related to well-known physical systems:
* <math>(p,q)=(6,5)</math> : 3-state [[quantum three-state Potts model| Potts model]] at criticality,
* <math>(p,q)=(7,6)</math> : tricritical 3-state Potts model.
The Kac tables of these models, together with a few other Kac tables with <math>2\leq q \leq 6</math>, are:
:<math>
\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{c|cc} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline & 1 & 2 \end{array}\\ c_{3,2}=0 \end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{c|cccc} 1 & 0 & - \frac{1}{5} & - \frac{1}{5} & 0 \\ \hline & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \end{array}\\ c_{5,2}=- \frac{22}{5} \end{array}
</math>
:<math>
\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{c|ccc} 2 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{16} & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & \frac{1}{16} & \frac{1}{2} \\ \hline & 1 & 2 & 3 \end{array}\\ c_{4,3}=\frac{1}{2} \end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{c|cccc} 2 & \frac{3}{4} & \frac{1}{5} & - \frac{1}{20} & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & - \frac{1}{20} & \frac{1}{5} & \frac{3}{4} \\ \hline & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \end{array}\\ c_{5,3}=- \frac{3}{5} \end{array}
</math>
:<math>
\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{c|cccc} 3 & \frac{3}{2} & \frac{3}{5} & \frac{1}{10} & 0 \\ 2 & \frac{7}{16} & \frac{3}{80} & \frac{3}{80} & \frac{7}{16} \\ 1 & 0 & \frac{1}{10} & \frac{3}{5} & \frac{3}{2} \\ \hline & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \end{array}\\ c_{5,4}=\frac{7}{10} \end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{c|cccccc} 3 & \frac{5}{2} & \frac{10}{7} & \frac{9}{14} & \frac{1}{7} & - \frac{1}{14} & 0 \\ 2 & \frac{13}{16} & \frac{27}{112} & - \frac{5}{112} & - \frac{5}{112} & \frac{27}{112} & \frac{13}{16} \\ 1 & 0 & - \frac{1}{14} & \frac{1}{7} & \frac{9}{14} & \frac{10}{7} & \frac{5}{2} \\ \hline & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \end{array}\\ c_{7,4}=- \frac{13}{14} \end{array}
</math>
:<math>
\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{c|ccccc} 4 & 3 & \frac{13}{8} & \frac{2}{3} & \frac{1}{8} & 0 \\ 3 & \frac{7}{5} & \frac{21}{40} & \frac{1}{15} & \frac{1}{40} & \frac{2}{5} \\ 2 & \frac{2}{5} & \frac{1}{40} & \frac{1}{15} & \frac{21}{40} & \frac{7}{5} \\ 1 & 0 & \frac{1}{8} & \frac{2}{3} & \frac{13}{8} & 3 \\ \hline & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \end{array}\\ c_{6,5}=\frac{4}{5} \end{array}
\qquad
\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{c|cccccc} 4 & \frac{15}{4} & \frac{16}{7} & \frac{33}{28} & \frac{3}{7} & \frac{1}{28} & 0 \\ 3 & \frac{9}{5} & \frac{117}{140} & \frac{8}{35} & - \frac{3}{140} & \frac{3}{35} & \frac{11}{20} \\ 2 & \frac{11}{20} & \frac{3}{35} & - \frac{3}{140} & \frac{8}{35} & \frac{117}{140} & \frac{9}{5} \\ 1 & 0 & \frac{1}{28} & \frac{3}{7} & \frac{33}{28} & \frac{16}{7} & \frac{15}{4} \\ \hline & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \end{array}\\ c_{7,5}=\frac{11}{35} \end{array}
</math>
:<math>
\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{c|cccccc} 5 & 5 & \frac{22}{7} & \frac{12}{7} & \frac{5}{7} & \frac{1}{7} & 0 \\ 4 & \frac{23}{8} & \frac{85}{56} & \frac{33}{56} & \frac{5}{56} & \frac{1}{56} & \frac{3}{8} \\ 3 & \frac{4}{3} & \frac{10}{21} & \frac{1}{21} & \frac{1}{21} & \frac{10}{21} & \frac{4}{3} \\ 2 & \frac{3}{8} & \frac{1}{56} & \frac{5}{56} & \frac{33}{56} & \frac{85}{56} & \frac{23}{8} \\ 1 & 0 & \frac{1}{7} & \frac{5}{7} & \frac{12}{7} & \frac{22}{7} & 5 \\ \hline & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \end{array}\\ c_{7,6}=\frac{6}{7} \end{array}
</math>

==Related conformal field theories==

===Coset realizations===

The A-series minimal model with indices <math>(p,q)</math> coincides with the following coset of [[WZW model|WZW models]]:<ref name = "BYB"/>
:<math> \frac{SU(2)_k\times SU(2)_1}{SU(2)_{k+1}}\ , \quad \text{where} \quad k = \frac{q}{p-q}-2\ .</math>
Assuming <math>p>q</math>, the level <math>k</math> is integer if and only if <math>p=q+1</math> i.e. if and only if the minimal model is unitary.

There exist other realizations of certain minimal models, diagonal or not, as cosets of WZW models, not necessarily based on the group <math>SU(2)</math>.<ref name = "BYB"/>

===Generalized minimal models===

For any central charge <math>c\in\mathbb{C}</math>, there is a diagonal CFT whose spectrum is made of all degenerate representations,
:<math> \mathcal{S}=\bigoplus_{r,s=1}^\infty \mathcal{R}_{r,s}\otimes \bar{\mathcal{R}}_{r,s} \ . </math>
When the central charge tends to <math>c_{p,q}</math>, the generalized minimal models tend to the corresponding A-series minimal model.<ref name="rib14">S. Ribault, "Conformal field theory on the plane", [https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4290 arXiv:1406.4290]</ref> This means in particular that the degenerate representations that are not in the Kac table decouple.

===Liouville theory===

Since [[Liouville field theory|Liouville theory]] reduces to a generalized minimal model when the fields are taken to be degenerate,<ref name="rib14"/> it further reduces to an A-series minimal model when the central charge is then sent to <math>c_{p,q}</math>.

Moreover, A-series minimal models have a well-defined limit as <math>c\to 1</math>: a diagonal CFT with a continuous spectrum called Runkel–Watts theory,<ref>I. Runkel, G. Watts, "A Nonrational CFT with c = 1 as a limit of minimal models", [https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0107118 arXiv:hep-th/0107118]</ref> which coincides with the limit of Liouville theory when <math>c\to 1^+</math>.<ref>V. Schomerus, "Rolling tachyons from Liouville theory",[https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0306026 arXiv:hep-th/0306026]</ref>

===Products of minimal models===

There are three cases of minimal models that are products of two minimal models.<ref>T. Quella, I. Runkel, G. Watts, "Reflection and Transmission for Conformal Defects", [https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0611296 arxiv:hep-th/0611296]</ref>
At the level of their spectrums, the relations are:
:<math> \mathcal{S}^\text{A-series}_{2,5}\otimes \mathcal{S}^\text{A-series}_{2,5} = \mathcal{S}^\text{D-series}_{3,10}\ , </math>
:<math> \mathcal{S}^\text{A-series}_{2,5}\otimes \mathcal{S}^\text{A-series}_{3,4} =
\mathcal{S}^\text{E-series}_{5,12} \ , </math>
:<math> \mathcal{S}^\text{A-series}_{2,5}\otimes \mathcal{S}^\text{A-series}_{2,7} =
\mathcal{S}^\text{E-series}_{7,30} \ . </math>

===Fermionic extensions of minimal models===

If <math>q\equiv 0\bmod 4</math>, the A-series and the D-series <math>(p,q)</math> minimal models each have a fermionic extension. These two fermionic extensions involve fields with half-integer spins, and they are related to one another by a parity-shift operation.<ref name="rw20"/>


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|refs=
* P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, ''Conformal Field Theory'', [[Springer Science+Business Media|Springer-Verlag]], [[New York]], 1997. ISBN 0-387-94785-X.
<ref name="bcm24">{{cite web | last=Benedetti | first=Valentin | last2=Casini | first2=Horacio | last3=Magan | first3=Javier M. | title=Selection rules for RG flows of minimal models | website=arXiv.org | date=2024-12-21 | url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16587 | access-date=2025-01-07}}</ref>
<ref name="rw20">{{cite journal |arxiv=2001.05055|last1=Runkel|first1=Ingo|last2=Watts|first2=Gerard|title=Fermionic CFTs and classifying algebras|journal=Journal of High Energy Physics|year=2020|volume=2020|issue=6|page=25|doi=10.1007/JHEP06(2020)025|bibcode=2020JHEP...06..025R|s2cid=210718696}}</ref>
}}

{{Quantum field theories}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Minimal Models}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Minimal Models}}
[[Category:Conformal field theory]]
[[Category:Conformal field theory]]
[[Category:Exactly solvable models]]
[[Category:Exactly solvable models]]


{{Phys-stub}}

Latest revision as of 10:40, 7 January 2025

In theoretical physics, a minimal model or Virasoro minimal model is a two-dimensional conformal field theory whose spectrum is built from finitely many irreducible representations of the Virasoro algebra. Minimal models have been classified and solved, and found to obey an ADE classification.[1] The term minimal model can also refer to a rational CFT based on an algebra that is larger than the Virasoro algebra, such as a W-algebra.

Relevant representations of the Virasoro algebra

[edit]

Representations

[edit]

In minimal models, the central charge of the Virasoro algebra takes values of the type

where are coprime integers such that . Then the conformal dimensions of degenerate representations are

and they obey the identities

The spectrums of minimal models are made of irreducible, degenerate lowest-weight representations of the Virasoro algebra, whose conformal dimensions are of the type with

Such a representation is a coset of a Verma module by its infinitely many nontrivial submodules. It is unitary if and only if . At a given central charge, there are distinct representations of this type. The set of these representations, or of their conformal dimensions, is called the Kac table with parameters . The Kac table is usually drawn as a rectangle of size , where each representation appears twice due to the relation

Fusion rules

[edit]

The fusion rules of the multiply degenerate representations encode constraints from all their null vectors. They can therefore be deduced from the fusion rules of simply degenerate representations, which encode constraints from individual null vectors.[2] Explicitly, the fusion rules are

where the sums run by increments of two.

Classification

[edit]

Minimal models are the only 2d CFTs that are consistent on any Riemann surface, and are built from finitely many representations of the Virasoro algebra.[2] There are many more rational CFTs that are consistent on the sphere only: these CFTs are submodels of minimal models, built from subsets of the Kac table that are closed under fusion. Such submodels can also be classified.[3]

A-series minimal models: the diagonal case

[edit]

For any coprime integers such that , there exists a diagonal minimal model whose spectrum contains one copy of each distinct representation in the Kac table:

The and models are the same.

The OPE of two fields involves all the fields that are allowed by the fusion rules of the corresponding representations.

D-series minimal models

[edit]

A D-series minimal model with the central charge exists if or is even and at least . Using the symmetry we assume that is even, then is odd. The spectrum is

where the sums over run by increments of two. In any given spectrum, each representation has multiplicity one, except the representations of the type if , which have multiplicity two. These representations indeed appear in both terms in our formula for the spectrum.

The OPE of two fields involves all the fields that are allowed by the fusion rules of the corresponding representations, and that respect the conservation of diagonality: the OPE of one diagonal and one non-diagonal field yields only non-diagonal fields, and the OPE of two fields of the same type yields only diagonal fields. [4] For this rule, one copy of the representation counts as diagonal, and the other copy as non-diagonal.

E-series minimal models

[edit]

There are three series of E-series minimal models. Each series exists for a given value of for any that is coprime with . (This actually implies .) Using the notation , the spectrums read:

Examples

[edit]

The following A-series minimal models are related to well-known physical systems:[2]

  •  : trivial CFT,
  •  : Yang-Lee edge singularity,
  •  : critical Ising model,
  •  : tricritical Ising model,
  •  : tetracritical Ising model.

The following D-series minimal models are related to well-known physical systems:

  •  : 3-state Potts model at criticality,
  •  : tricritical 3-state Potts model.

The Kac tables of these models, together with a few other Kac tables with , are:

[edit]

Coset realizations

[edit]

The A-series minimal model with indices coincides with the following coset of WZW models:[2]

Assuming , the level is integer if and only if i.e. if and only if the minimal model is unitary.

There exist other realizations of certain minimal models, diagonal or not, as cosets of WZW models, not necessarily based on the group .[2]

Generalized minimal models

[edit]

For any central charge , there is a diagonal CFT whose spectrum is made of all degenerate representations,

When the central charge tends to , the generalized minimal models tend to the corresponding A-series minimal model.[5] This means in particular that the degenerate representations that are not in the Kac table decouple.

Liouville theory

[edit]

Since Liouville theory reduces to a generalized minimal model when the fields are taken to be degenerate,[5] it further reduces to an A-series minimal model when the central charge is then sent to .

Moreover, A-series minimal models have a well-defined limit as : a diagonal CFT with a continuous spectrum called Runkel–Watts theory,[6] which coincides with the limit of Liouville theory when .[7]

Products of minimal models

[edit]

There are three cases of minimal models that are products of two minimal models.[8] At the level of their spectrums, the relations are:

Fermionic extensions of minimal models

[edit]

If , the A-series and the D-series minimal models each have a fermionic extension. These two fermionic extensions involve fields with half-integer spins, and they are related to one another by a parity-shift operation.[9]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ A. Cappelli, J-B. Zuber, "A-D-E Classification of Conformal Field Theories", Scholarpedia
  2. ^ a b c d e P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory, 1997, ISBN 0-387-94785-X
  3. ^ Benedetti, Valentin; Casini, Horacio; Magan, Javier M. (2024-12-21). "Selection rules for RG flows of minimal models". arXiv.org. Retrieved 2025-01-07.
  4. ^ I. Runkel, "Structure constants for the D series Virasoro minimal models", hep-th/9908046
  5. ^ a b S. Ribault, "Conformal field theory on the plane", arXiv:1406.4290
  6. ^ I. Runkel, G. Watts, "A Nonrational CFT with c = 1 as a limit of minimal models", arXiv:hep-th/0107118
  7. ^ V. Schomerus, "Rolling tachyons from Liouville theory",arXiv:hep-th/0306026
  8. ^ T. Quella, I. Runkel, G. Watts, "Reflection and Transmission for Conformal Defects", arxiv:hep-th/0611296
  9. ^ Runkel, Ingo; Watts, Gerard (2020). "Fermionic CFTs and classifying algebras". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2020 (6): 25. arXiv:2001.05055. Bibcode:2020JHEP...06..025R. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)025. S2CID 210718696.