Jump to content

Talk:Grace Bates: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
tag
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Keep 1 different rating in {{WikiProject Biography}}. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with unknown parameters)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{notice|{{find}}}}
{{Notice|{{find}}}}
{{notice|This article was created on [[Ada Lovelace Day]] at the Women in Leadership editathon}}
{{Notice|This article was created on [[Ada Lovelace Day]] at the Women in Leadership editathon}}
{{DYK talk|28 October|2013|entry= ... that mathematician '''[[Grace Bates]]''' was the only woman allowed to study [[differential equation]]s in her final year at college?}}
{{WPWS|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Biography|living=n|class=C|listas=Bates, Grace|s&a-work-group=y|s&a-priority=Low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|listas=Bates, Grace|blp=n|
{{WikiProject Women scientists}}
{{WikiProject Biography|class=C|s&a-work-group=y|s&a-priority=Low}}
}}
{{Did you know nominations/Grace Bates}}
{{Did you know nominations/Grace Bates}}

{{dyktalk|28 October|2013|entry= ... that mathematician '''[[Grace Bates]]''' was the only woman allowed to study [[differential equation]]s in her final year at college?}}
== This is based almost entirely on the work of Margaret A.M. Murray ==

Everything in this article is derived from the work of Margaret A.M. Murray: her essay, "Women Becoming Mathematicians: Constructing a Professional Identity in Post-World War II America," pp. 37-91 of the volume edited by Jody Bart; and her book, with a similar title, that appears in the list of references. In addition, the biography of Bates in American Women of Science draws on a single reference: Murray's book! The interview with Bates was conducted, not by Valerie Morphew, but by Murray. (Although Valerie Morphew is a contributor to Bart's volume, her much shorter article appears after Murray's and has nothing whatever to do with Grace Bates.) While I salute efforts to add entries about women to Wikipedia, extensive quotations from copyrighted material should be correctly attributed to their authors---and in this case, to a single author, Murray. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/63.152.88.251|63.152.88.251]] ([[User talk:63.152.88.251|talk]]) 18:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Article quality ==
The current version of this article reads like a middle-school book report. The text is insipid, poorly organized, and clumsily written. I see that the subject's name is even misspelled at least once. Crappy, crappy stuff. Needs cleanup by someone with more time to invest than I do. —&nbsp;'''[[User:Jaydiem|Jaydiem]]'''&nbsp;([[User talk:Jaydiem|talk]]) 21:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

@Jaydiem Ouch! Comments like this are incredibly discouraging to people who might be interested in helping update or create a page. Learn some humility!

Latest revision as of 07:53, 9 January 2025


This is based almost entirely on the work of Margaret A.M. Murray

[edit]

Everything in this article is derived from the work of Margaret A.M. Murray: her essay, "Women Becoming Mathematicians: Constructing a Professional Identity in Post-World War II America," pp. 37-91 of the volume edited by Jody Bart; and her book, with a similar title, that appears in the list of references. In addition, the biography of Bates in American Women of Science draws on a single reference: Murray's book! The interview with Bates was conducted, not by Valerie Morphew, but by Murray. (Although Valerie Morphew is a contributor to Bart's volume, her much shorter article appears after Murray's and has nothing whatever to do with Grace Bates.) While I salute efforts to add entries about women to Wikipedia, extensive quotations from copyrighted material should be correctly attributed to their authors---and in this case, to a single author, Murray. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.152.88.251 (talk) 18:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article quality

[edit]

The current version of this article reads like a middle-school book report. The text is insipid, poorly organized, and clumsily written. I see that the subject's name is even misspelled at least once. Crappy, crappy stuff. Needs cleanup by someone with more time to invest than I do. — Jaydiem (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaydiem Ouch! Comments like this are incredibly discouraging to people who might be interested in helping update or create a page. Learn some humility!