Talk:Grace Bates: Difference between revisions
tag |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Keep 1 different rating in {{WikiProject Biography}}. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with unknown parameters) Tag: |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Notice|{{find}}}} |
||
{{ |
{{Notice|This article was created on [[Ada Lovelace Day]] at the Women in Leadership editathon}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{WPWS|class=Start}} |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|listas=Bates, Grace|blp=n| |
||
{{WikiProject Women scientists}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography|class=C|s&a-work-group=y|s&a-priority=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Did you know nominations/Grace Bates}} |
{{Did you know nominations/Grace Bates}} |
||
⚫ | |||
== This is based almost entirely on the work of Margaret A.M. Murray == |
|||
Everything in this article is derived from the work of Margaret A.M. Murray: her essay, "Women Becoming Mathematicians: Constructing a Professional Identity in Post-World War II America," pp. 37-91 of the volume edited by Jody Bart; and her book, with a similar title, that appears in the list of references. In addition, the biography of Bates in American Women of Science draws on a single reference: Murray's book! The interview with Bates was conducted, not by Valerie Morphew, but by Murray. (Although Valerie Morphew is a contributor to Bart's volume, her much shorter article appears after Murray's and has nothing whatever to do with Grace Bates.) While I salute efforts to add entries about women to Wikipedia, extensive quotations from copyrighted material should be correctly attributed to their authors---and in this case, to a single author, Murray. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/63.152.88.251|63.152.88.251]] ([[User talk:63.152.88.251|talk]]) 18:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Article quality == |
|||
The current version of this article reads like a middle-school book report. The text is insipid, poorly organized, and clumsily written. I see that the subject's name is even misspelled at least once. Crappy, crappy stuff. Needs cleanup by someone with more time to invest than I do. — '''[[User:Jaydiem|Jaydiem]]''' ([[User talk:Jaydiem|talk]]) 21:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
@Jaydiem Ouch! Comments like this are incredibly discouraging to people who might be interested in helping update or create a page. Learn some humility! |
Latest revision as of 07:53, 9 January 2025
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was created on Ada Lovelace Day at the Women in Leadership editathon |
A fact from Grace Bates appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is based almost entirely on the work of Margaret A.M. Murray
[edit]Everything in this article is derived from the work of Margaret A.M. Murray: her essay, "Women Becoming Mathematicians: Constructing a Professional Identity in Post-World War II America," pp. 37-91 of the volume edited by Jody Bart; and her book, with a similar title, that appears in the list of references. In addition, the biography of Bates in American Women of Science draws on a single reference: Murray's book! The interview with Bates was conducted, not by Valerie Morphew, but by Murray. (Although Valerie Morphew is a contributor to Bart's volume, her much shorter article appears after Murray's and has nothing whatever to do with Grace Bates.) While I salute efforts to add entries about women to Wikipedia, extensive quotations from copyrighted material should be correctly attributed to their authors---and in this case, to a single author, Murray. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.152.88.251 (talk) 18:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Article quality
[edit]The current version of this article reads like a middle-school book report. The text is insipid, poorly organized, and clumsily written. I see that the subject's name is even misspelled at least once. Crappy, crappy stuff. Needs cleanup by someone with more time to invest than I do. — Jaydiem (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
@Jaydiem Ouch! Comments like this are incredibly discouraging to people who might be interested in helping update or create a page. Learn some humility!
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class Women scientists articles
- Unknown-importance Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women scientists articles
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles