Jump to content

Talk:Britney Spears/to do: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Oidia (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
*To Prepare for FA STATUS, from Peer Review:
* To Prepare this article for FA status.
* From Peer review: It is mainly structural and syntactical issues that separate it from FA status - there are plenty of facts but they are poorly presented and organised.
*Sparse inline citations, and many of the ones that are there aren't high quality.
* Addition of pictures and/or photographs to illustrate the relevant topics/sections. Preferably free images.
*The Table of Contents is huge.
*Get more critical analysis of her work (look up reviews in Rolling Stone, Entertainment Weekly, newspapers of large cities, etc.).
*Personal section is light on real substance
*"Career achievments" is light on real substance.
*Fill in 2 citations
*Format the 2 added in link links into citations
*Some pictures have network logos in them and the logos should be cropped out or another picture should be found as this is copyright infrigment
*a cover picture of Rolling Stone in April 1999 is discussed, yet the cover is not pictured in the article.
*It is mainly structural and syntactical issues like this that which separate it from FA status - there are plenty of facts but they are poorly presented and organised.
*The See also list is also shockingly biased - essentially a list of lists which make Spears look good. I wonder if I should add List of people with the shortest marriages to balance it out!
*the article also has a very messy supporting article base, many needing serious cleanup.
*I'd suggest to do a lot of paragraph merging - keep them nice and long.
*I'd suggest getting rid of the subsections of "personal" and merging everything to get more prose.
*Add that she was in a Girl Band before she was solo...but backed out of it

Latest revision as of 11:13, 10 September 2007

  • To Prepare this article for FA status.
  • From Peer review: It is mainly structural and syntactical issues that separate it from FA status - there are plenty of facts but they are poorly presented and organised.
  • Addition of pictures and/or photographs to illustrate the relevant topics/sections. Preferably free images.