Parliamentary supremacy: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 17:57, 3 October 2004

Redirect to:

Parliamentary sovereignty

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+#REDIRECT [[Parliamentary sovereignty]]
-In [[British constitutional law]], '''parliamentary supremacy''' is the principle that the current [[parliament of the United Kingdom]] is supreme to all other governmental institutions including the [[British monarch|monarch]] and the [[court]]s, and may change legislation passed by previous parliaments. (Theoretically, the monarch is a part of the [[Crown in Parliament]].)
-The principle of parliamentary supremacy was established over the 17th and 18th centuries during which time parliament asserted the right to name and depose a king.
-Parliamentary supremacy prevents [[judicial review]] of local domestic law.  However in the late 20th and early 21st century, the theory of parliamentary supremacy underwent erosion from three directions.
-*The first is the [[devolution]] of power to local assemblies in [[Scotland]], [[Wales]] and [[Northern Ireland]].
-*The second erosion has been in connection with institutions of the [[European Union]], in particular the [[European Court of Justice]] which asserts the power to exercise [[judicial review]] over UK law. In this situation, an adverse finding by the Court that a UK law is inconsistent with the Treaties automatically annuls the law, since the [[European Communities Act]] provides that European Community law is supreme in the United Kingdom.
-*The third erosion has been in connection with the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] and the incorporation by the [[Human Rights Act 1998]] of the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law. The [[European Court of Human Rights]] can find acts of the UK government (including those done pursuant to an Act of the British Parliament) to be in violation of the Convention. However, decisions by the ECHR (unlike decisions by the ECJ) does not automatically annul the law; the Government must introduce a bill into Parliament to implement the ECHR's decisions.  Acting under the Human Rights Act, British courts can declare Acts of Parliament to be in violation of the Convention; this power, like that of the European Court of Human Rights, does not automatically annul the law. However, unlike the ECHR, the British Courts have a formal procedure for the review of Acts (technically the ECHR reviews acts done by the member state, which can include both legislation but also other government actions, but the two are not distinguished), resulting in a Declaration of Incompatibility. The Declaration of Incompatibility does not annul the law, but enables the Government to use an accelerated procedure to enact a bill to repeal it.
-However, in each case, there is no theoretical erosion of Parliamentary supremacy.  Parliament may abolish any of the devolved legislatures at its pleasure. The European and British Courts have the authority to declare incompatibility or to annul a law only because of an [[Act of Parliament]], which can be repealed by Parliament. Thus, theoretically, Parliament remains almost entirely sovereign. (The qualifier "almost" is provided because in the 1920's, after years of dispute, Parliament finally agreed that it does not have sovereignty over the [[Church of Scotland]], the established church in Scotland.)