User:Proteins/Sandbox4: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
test increasing indentations |
add reversal to tests and number the sentences |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This is spaced, undented text. |
This is spaced, undented text. |
||
: |
: Sentence 1 is indented once. |
||
: |
: Sentence 2 is also indented once. |
||
: |
: Sentence 3 is once again indented once. |
||
This is unspaced, undented text. |
This is unspaced, undented text. |
||
: |
: Sentence 4 is indented once. |
||
: |
: Sentence 5 is also indented once. |
||
: |
: Sentence 6 is once again indented once. |
||
This text is spaced and increasingly indented. |
This text is spaced and increasingly indented. |
||
: |
: Sentence 7 is indented once. |
||
:: |
:: Sentence 8 is indented twice. |
||
::: |
::: Sentence 9 is indented thrice. |
||
This text is unspaced and increasingly indented. |
|||
==Spaced, multi-indented real-world text== |
|||
: Sentence 10 is indented once. |
|||
In light of the ongoing discussions, and considering I've seen multiple instant re-noms lately (within three or four days, sometimes within only one day after archiving), I [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template%3AFAC-instructions&diff=244289575&oldid=233749232 added this to the FAC instructions.] Please review my addition. It takes four edits minimum to remove a premature re-nom, and usually results in a longer discussion with an angry nominator; having something in the instructions may help. There have always been exceptions: as an example, suppose I were to misread a nomination and completely miss Supports (haven't done that yet, but it could happen); then we would allow a re-nom right away. There could be other extenuating circumstances. I read the discussions and concerns about FAC being stretched thin above as asking for more time between noms to better address issues. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 09:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:: Sentence 11 is indented twice. |
|||
::: Sentence 12 is indented thrice. |
|||
This text is spaced and reverses indentation level. |
|||
:: Shouldn't the vague "several weeks at least" be replaced with a concrete, say, "two weeks at least"? --[[User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] ([[User talk:Redtigerxyz|talk]]) 10:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: Sentence 13 is indented once. |
|||
:::I don't think two is "several"! The moment you add a number, you can forget about "at least". It might be worth adding that the Director and delegate can remove any nomination that is clearly not ready, or not sufficiently changed since the last FAC. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 10:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:: Sentence 14 is indented twice. |
|||
:::: Thats my point "several" should be defined in terms of time. Also, maybe a peer review can be made compulsory before the next FAC.--[[User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] ([[User talk:Redtigerxyz|talk]]) 11:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::: Sentence 15 is indented thrice. |
|||
:::::Or it could be dealt with case-by-case, in which articles can be renominated once the issues from the previous FACs are sufficiently addressed. –[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 16:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:: Sentence 16 is indented twice. |
|||
:::::: Compulsory peer review has been disapproved by the FAC community many times, for good reason. Almost everything at FAC, in fact on Wiki, is dealt with case by case; the wording should allow that flexibility. I don't disagree with Johnbod's suggestion, although I can't envision every doing that except in the cases already allowed (significant contributors not consulted and premature re-nom), so I'm not sure we need it. If a FAC is clearly badly unprepared, a few quick opposes will solve that; I archive almost daily. Actually, "several" probably should have been "two". [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:22, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::: Sentence 17 is indented thrice. |
|||
This text is unspaced and reverses indentation level. |
|||
: Sentence 18 is indented once. |
|||
:: Sentence 19 is indented twice. |
|||
::: Sentence 20 is indented thrice. |
|||
:: Sentence 21 is indented twice. |
|||
::: Sentence 22 is indented thrice. |
|||
:::: Sentence 23 is indented four times. |
|||
If this works, now go back to [[User:Proteins/Sandbox3]]. |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:29, 24 October 2008
Academic test
[edit]This is spaced, undented text.
- Sentence 1 is indented once.
- Sentence 2 is also indented once.
- Sentence 3 is once again indented once.
This is unspaced, undented text.
- Sentence 4 is indented once.
- Sentence 5 is also indented once.
- Sentence 6 is once again indented once.
This text is spaced and increasingly indented.
- Sentence 7 is indented once.
- Sentence 8 is indented twice.
- Sentence 9 is indented thrice.
This text is unspaced and increasingly indented.
- Sentence 10 is indented once.
- Sentence 11 is indented twice.
- Sentence 12 is indented thrice.
- Sentence 11 is indented twice.
This text is spaced and reverses indentation level.
- Sentence 13 is indented once.
- Sentence 14 is indented twice.
- Sentence 15 is indented thrice.
- Sentence 16 is indented twice.
- Sentence 17 is indented thrice.
This text is unspaced and reverses indentation level.
- Sentence 18 is indented once.
- Sentence 19 is indented twice.
- Sentence 20 is indented thrice.
- Sentence 21 is indented twice.
- Sentence 22 is indented thrice.
- Sentence 23 is indented four times.
- Sentence 22 is indented thrice.
- Sentence 19 is indented twice.
If this works, now go back to User:Proteins/Sandbox3.