User talk:Milburyshoe: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Addict 2006 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Your recent edits to Tony Almeida - uw-vandalism3 |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | <div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' for a period of '''3 days''' from editing in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for persistent '''[[Wikipedia:Vandalism|disruptive editing]]'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 22:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to |
||
==Further message on your second block== |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Mike Milbury|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Mike Milbury]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 06:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*Removing warnings and other material from your talk page does not remove the history and provide a clean slate. You are engaged in what appears to be a single purpose activity and simply coming back several times a day every day or so is still disruptive editing. I appreciate that you have an interest in the Milbury shoe episode but this material should not be returned until a firm consensus of inclusion based on wikipedia's policies and guidelines is established at the article's talk page. You stand the risk of being blocked indefinitely if you return with the same editing pattern.--[[User:VirtualSteve|<strong>VS</strong>]] <sup>[[User_talk:VirtualSteve|talk]]</sup> 22:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | <div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' |
||
| ⚫ | [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, {{#if:Tony Almeida|as you did at [[:Tony Almeida]],}} you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> <tt>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</tt> 18:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles{{#if:24 (season 7)|, as you did to [[:24 (season 7)]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> --[[User:Addict 2006|Addict]] [[User talk:Addict 2006|2006]] 15:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:41, 2 March 2009
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. --VS talk 22:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Further message on your second block
[edit]- Removing warnings and other material from your talk page does not remove the history and provide a clean slate. You are engaged in what appears to be a single purpose activity and simply coming back several times a day every day or so is still disruptive editing. I appreciate that you have an interest in the Milbury shoe episode but this material should not be returned until a firm consensus of inclusion based on wikipedia's policies and guidelines is established at the article's talk page. You stand the risk of being blocked indefinitely if you return with the same editing pattern.--VS talk 22:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tony Almeida, you will be blocked from editing. decltype 18:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)