Talk:Fluxx goals: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 05:18, 7 March 2009

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Fluxx.

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Fluxx.

Requested move

This article should be separate from the main article as each version has its own goals, and with at least 6 versions this section would be massive.

Why is it encyclopedic to re-state the goals of every version? I can see how one section, within Fluxx, could usefully describe one set of goals so as to better explain the play of the game. However listing every goal for every version seems to be straying from encyclopedic description into WP:NOTGUIDE Andy Dingley (talk)

My objective was to cross reference each Keeper with the other Keepers that it shares goals with. So we can see that Chocolate is in 4 goals. It forms a reference piece where players can see what Keepers are worth trying to keep hold of, and which goals are useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.25.168 (talk) 13:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's valuable information to any Fluxx player. But is it encyclopedia content? Andy Dingley (talk) 15:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably encyclopediac; once the 6 versions of information are logged, then anyone wanting the knowledge will look it up.--Kevinstone (talk) 22:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, WP:NOTGUIDE Andy Dingley (talk) 01:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can this content be rewritten to be encyclopediac? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.25.168 (talk) 12:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be merged into the Fluxx article or given an encyclopedic reason to exist. Otherwise it is for AFD. 2005 (talk) 09:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merging won't make it encyclopedic. This is appropriate content for Rabbit Wiki, not for Wikipedia. Doctroid (talk) 20:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{oldafdfull| date = 2 March 2009 (UTC) | result = '''redirect to [[Fluxx]]''' | page = Fluxx goals }}
-{{rename|Fluxx goals}}
+{{oldafdfull| date = 16 January 2009 (UTC) | result = '''merge to [[Fluxx]]''' | page = Fluxx goals }}
 == Requested move ==
@@ Line 12: / Line 13: @@
 : Again, [[WP:NOTGUIDE]] [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 01:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
+Can this content be rewritten to be encyclopediac?  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.141.25.168|86.141.25.168]] ([[User talk:86.141.25.168|talk]]) 12:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-Can this content be rewritten to be encyclopediac?
+:This needs to be merged into the Fluxx article or given an encyclopedic reason to exist. Otherwise it is for AFD. [[User:2005|2005]] ([[User talk:2005|talk]]) 09:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
+::Merging won't make it encyclopedic.  This is appropriate content for [http://rabbits.continuation.org/wiki/Main_Page Rabbit Wiki], not for Wikipedia. [[User:Doctroid|Doctroid]] ([[User talk:Doctroid|talk]]) 20:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)