Jump to content

User talk:RunedChozo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
RunedChozo (talk | contribs)
581 edits
m Fix.
 
(105 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[User:RunedChozo]]
==Welcome to Wikipedia!!!==
{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#CEF2E0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #084080; text-align:left; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;"> Hello <font color=#0000FF>{{PAGENAME}}</font>! [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|Welcome]] to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|your contributions]]. If you decide that you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Where to ask a question]], ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{&#123;helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈ ]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|t]] &bull; [[Special:Emailuser/Jossi|@]]</small> </div>
|}
{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Started</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* [[Wikipedia:Tutorial|Wikipedia Tutorial]]
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]]
* [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]]
* [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|Be bold in editing]]
* [[Wikipedia:How to write a great article|How to write a great article]]
* [[Wikipedia:List of WikiProjects|WikiProjects]]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting your info out there</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* [[Wikipedia:Cite your sources|Cite your sources]]
* [[Wikipedia:NPOV|Neutral Point of View]]
* [[Wikipedia:POV|Point of View]]
* [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]]
* [[Wikipedia:Uploading images|Uploading images]]
* [[Wikipedia:Image use policy|Image use policy]]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting more Wikipedia rules</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Policy Library]]
|-
|}
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Help</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* [[Wikipedia:New contributors' help page|New contributors' help page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Where to ask a question|Where to ask a question]]
* [[Wikipedia:Help desk|Help Desk]]
* [[Wikipedia:FAQ|Frequently Asked Questions]]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting along</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette|Wikiquette]]
* [[Wikipedia:Civility|Civility]]
* [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|Sign your posts]]
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedians]]
* [[Wikipedia:Conflict resolution|Conflict resolution]]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting technical</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
[[Image:Wikimedia.png|60px|right]]
* [[Wikipedia:Pages needing attention|Pages needing attention]]
* [[Wikipedia:Peer review|Peer review]]
* [[Wikipedia:Utilities|Utilities]]
* [[Wikipedia:Village pump|Village pump]]
|-
|}
|}
|} [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|t]] &bull; [[Special:Emailuser/Jossi|@]]</small> 14:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

== Redirects at Little Green Footballs ==

Hi. I wonder whether you saw my note at [[Talk:Little Green Footballs#Redirects]]. To test what I wrote there, go to http://www.drmenlo.com/lgfquiz/ or http://www.jewschool.com/index.php?p=7717 and click on a link to LGF. You'll end up at http://www1.idf.il/DOVER/site/homepage.asp?clr=1&sl=HE&id=-8888&force=1 (unless you have disabled [[HTTP referer]]s in your web browser). Note that it's been some time since these sites attacked LGF, so we can conclude that those redirects are permanent measures, not short-term fixes.

I've done some web searches. The best source I've come up with is http://lgfwatch.blogspot.com/2003/10/lgf-under-scrutiny-charles-johnson.html, which is unacceptable because it calls LGF "rabid racists". The only LGF article I've found which says much about redirects is http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=17109, which is only tangentially about redirects from "enemy" websites.

This is why I prefer my version of the sentence about redirects ("Johnson has configured his website ..."). Would you mind taking a look at this issue and letting me know what you think? (I'll [[Wikipedia:Watchlist|watch]] this page for at least a week, so I'll see any questions or comments you put here.)

An aside: I personally don't like this redirection trick (there's an obnoxious Australian blogger who uses it a lot), but I ''do'' like Charles' choice of destination. Cheers, [[User:Chris Chittleborough|CWC]]<small>[[User talk:Chris Chittleborough|(talk)]]</small> 16:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

== Blocked for 24 hours ==

You have been blocked for 24 hours, for moving [[Beit Hanoun November 2006 massacre]] to [[Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident]]. There's a massive warning on the top of the article, there's an ongoing discussion on the article's talk page to which you contributed, you referred to WP:ANI where I placed a notice of the warning, and still you chose to move the article, despite any consensus. You didn't even bring it up beforehand. Yes, we have [[WP:NPOV]]. But we also have common sense. You ignored the warnings and thereby continued an ongoing move war. Add to that the tensions that every article about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict already faces. You should have been more cautious. This single-handed move does not benefit the article or wikipedia. [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aecis|<font color="blue">A</font>]][[User:Aecis|<font color="green">ecis</font>]] <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Aecis|Dancing]] to electro-pop [[User talk:Aecis|like a robot]] from 1984.</sup> 22:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
:A few things I would like to say regarding your unblock request. I will obviously not review the request itself, because that's not the way the review process works.
:I have said on the article's page that I will block anyone who moves the article before consensus has been reached. I explicitly said "Anyone. Even if you move it back to the current title." Because I can't judge the intentions, despite [[WP:AGF|assuming good faith]], I can only judge actions. Under the current circumstances (the move war the article is undergoing, the tensions related to articles about the conflict in the Middle East in general, etc.), I believe you should not have moved the page yourself, but contacted either the admin's noticeboard or an admin individually.
:I do not refuse to respond to you. But I haven't received a message on my talk page (which is obvious, because this account is blocked), I haven't received an e-mail, you didn't reply to the above notice on this user talk page afaict, so I don't know what to respond to. The only thing I can respond to is the unblock request, which is what I'm now doing.
:I would also like to ask the admin reviewing this unblock request to review the block of {{user|Burgas00}} as well. He/she was blocked for the same action on the same article, following the same warning, etc. [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aecis|<font color="blue">A</font>]][[User:Aecis|<font color="green">ecis</font>]] <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Aecis|Dancing]] to electro-pop [[User talk:Aecis|like a robot]] from 1984.</sup> 23:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
::You're refusing to respond to my email and if you claim you left me one, you lied. I put it back because someone was blocked for moving it and the admin who posted said they didn't want to be the one who put it back because they didnt want to appear involved, so I did it as a favor to them to put things the way they were supposed to be. I'm supposed to be bold and do things to make wikipedia better mmkay?[[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 23:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
:::I have just checked my mailbox again, and I can say in all honesty that I have not received an e-mail from you. You claim you have sent me one, and I believe you when you say you have. But apparently it hasn't arrived. And how can I respond to an e-mail that doesn't arrive? [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aecis|<font color="blue">A</font>]][[User:Aecis|<font color="green">ecis</font>]] <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Aecis|Dancing]] to electro-pop [[User talk:Aecis|like a robot]] from 1984.</sup> 23:51, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
:::I would like to emphasize that I am convinced that you acted with the best of intentions and that you have probably become a victim of your own kindness. But a final warning is a final warning. [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aecis|<font color="blue">A</font>]][[User:Aecis|<font color="green">ecis</font>]] <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Aecis|Dancing]] to electro-pop [[User talk:Aecis|like a robot]] from 1984.</sup> 00:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
::If you would like to positively contribute to Wikipedia, I suggest you review [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]], [[Wikipedia:Civility]]. While I'm sure it isn't your intent, the tone and nature of your comments are not in line with the aforementioned policies, and as someone who agrees with some of you positions, I feel that violating those policies only serves to undermine your arguments. <font style="color:#22AA00;">'''[[User:Tewfik|Tewfik]]'''</font><font style="color:#888888;"><sup>[[User Talk:Tewfik|Talk]]</sup></font> 17:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
:::AGF only goes so far before you are just being a fool; nothing these people are doing indicates they are acting in good faith or trying to adhere to NPOV policies. It might stretch the bounds of civility to say that out loud, but to let them get away with pretending otherwise is far worse for Wikipedia. [[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 19:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
== [[Avatar: The Last Airbender (video game)]] ==

The plot section is back, and I'd like to ask you not to remove it again. It is certainly not vandalism, as you claim. It is an attempt to improve Wikipedia. Yes, it needs rewriting, and yes, only those who have played the game know whether it's accurate or not. But until someone who has played the game comes along and rewrites it to make it look better, I think we should let it stand. It's better than nothing. --[[User:Herald Alberich|Herald Alberich]] 19:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
:"Fancruft" refers to information that is only of interest to devoted fans. A plot section, on the other hand, is a well-established component of most video game articles. The basic plot of a game is surely worthy of note on an encyclopedia article about the game, no? And with all respect to you, how do you know it's inaccurate? The only reason I imagine you could make that claim is if you've played the game, or otherwise know what the actual plot is, which means you could add it yourself. Not knowing the plot myself, I'm not going to do anything one way or another, but when someone who does know (and can write well) comes along, I would think it'd be easier to improve a bad section than create a new one. --[[User:Herald Alberich|Herald Alberich]] 18:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

==agf==
Bro, i did not even know the name of the village, i just saw on tv that Israel had killed some large bunch of people and i wanted to make an article about it, just check the name i choose when i created the article.

And no, i have not contact with all the guys in the guild, because one or some of them knew of the article does not mean that i had any idea of it. In fact, i was not even aware that the guys whose name i do not remember is a part of the guild.

As said, i did not even knew the name of the village, i figured it out as i research for my article, i went to the villages article to link to my article from there, and i there discovered that it already linked to another article on the same topic. I looked at its history, and i discovered that it was created prior to my article, so i added merge tags.

And that is all, no dark conspiracy, no contact with guild member, no contacting others regarding the afd. I don't care if you believe me or not, not one bit. I just wrote it since i felt i would appreciate the information if i was in your shoes. --[[User:Striver|Striver]] 16:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
:"''i just saw on tv that Israel had killed some large bunch of people''" - and you believe everything you see on TV, without any research into the actual context, no doubt.

:Look. I don't trust you for a minute. You created a POV fork when there was already obviously another article on the same thing. I don't believe for a moment that you didn't know it existed. I'm not assuming good faith again until you show some and stop trying to blatantly POV push. The proper thing for you to do would be to admit it was a fork, support its deletion, and THEN if you want to see the items added to the other article, argue for their inclusion on the talk page. Some of the comments I might support. Some of the crap you wrote is blatant POV and has no place on Wikipedia at all.

:By trying to push this "merge" thing, what you are doing is trying to shoehorn obviously POV content into an article that others are working very hard to keep to NPOV standards. I've watched the commentary by your friends, who are all about making the article as blatantly anti-Israel as possible. That is bad faith, I say you are working in bad faith, and I'm going to say so until you demonstrate otherwise, because your conduct till now is well beyond the bounds of AGF. [[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 16:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC) (also posted to [[user:Striver]]'s talk page)

== Removing your comments was an accident ==

::Sorry that was a mistake. I was reverting vandalism by another user. Thanks for informing me.[[User:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]] 22:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Not a problem, honest mistakes happen :) [[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 22:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

== Solicitation ==

Please do not solicit other users' opinion on an [[WP:AFD|Articles for Deletion]] debate, as you did here.[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hkelkar&diff=prev&oldid=87851176] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aecis&diff=prev&oldid=87849774] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rosicrucian&diff=prev&oldid=87849285] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PiMaster3&diff=prev&oldid=87849237] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tewfik&diff=prev&oldid=87849144] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hkelkar&diff=prev&oldid=87849070] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Briangotts&diff=prev&oldid=87849006] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NotAWeasel&diff=prev&oldid=87848915] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Humus_sapiens&diff=prev&oldid=87848832] It is considered [[WP:SPAM#Canvassing|canvassing]], and you can be blocked for it. As such, the AfD debate in question may be voided because of these actions. Please do not do it again - repeat attempts at creating a false sense of [[WP:CON|concensus]] may end up with you being blocked. '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|Daniel.Bryant]] <sup>[&nbsp;[[User talk:Daniel.Bryant|T]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Daniel.Bryant|C]]&nbsp;]</sup>''' 22:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
:You're misinterpreting: all of these people were voters on the previous AFD in question and the AFD I was directing them to was clearly created in bad faith. I also noted it on WP:ANI to request Speedy Keep as you no doubt noticed. [[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 22:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

:: Hi, welcome and thanks for the notification. If you find serious violations, there are [[WP:HELP|proper places]] to report them. I think all of us would benefit if our rhetoric is toned down and we [[WP:COOL|keep it cool]]. Let's try to keep [[WP:ENC|this project encyclopedic]]. Thanks. ←[[User:Humus sapiens|Humus sapiens]] <sup>[[User talk:Humus sapiens|ну?]]</sup> 23:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

==Re: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=PlayStation_Portable&diff=prev&oldid=87868698 This edit]==
{{npa}} -[[User:Hit bull, win steak|Hit bull, win steak]]<sup>[[User talk:Hit bull, win steak|(Moo!)]]</sup> 14:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
*<strike>While I'm at it, the edit summary for [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NotAWeasel&diff=prev&oldid=87787965 this edit] isn't particularly courteous, either. -[[User:Hit bull, win steak|Hit bull, win steak]]<sup>[[User talk:Hit bull, win steak|(Moo!)]]</sup> 14:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)</strike>Sorry, didn't realize the edit summary was a section header, rather than a comment. THe first example still stands, though; it's not nice to call someone an ignoramus, even if they're doing something stupid. -[[User:Hit bull, win steak|Hit bull, win steak]]<sup>[[User talk:Hit bull, win steak|(Moo!)]]</sup> 14:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
:*Not a problem, it was just intended as a gentle reminder. I've certainly been there before; we all have good days and bad ones. -17:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

== When you add a new section to a talk page, please use the + tab at the top of the page ==

You created a new section in [[User talk:Hit bull, win steak‎]] by editing the last section. This was a no-no as it told me you edited a section I was interested in. You can use the + tab to create a new section in talk pages (and some others like [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)]]). Thanks. [[User:Yankees76|Yankees76]] 16:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

== Assume good faith, article PlayStation Portable ==

The recent edits I made to PlayStation Portable were not of a destructive nature. All of my edits were positive and designed to improve readability, improve grammar, correct spelling mistakes, achieve a neutral point of view, and to remove frivolous sentences and paragraphs. Remember to [[assume good faith]] when on Wikipedia. - [[User:ZakuSage|ZakuSage]] 21:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
:Whole sections were deleted because they were more appropriately placed within other sections, they contained far too much irrelevant information, or did little other then to advertise for software and hardware. If you took the time to actually compare the relevant versions[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=PlayStation_Portable&diff=87947077&oldid=87868698], you'd see that the article has become [[Wikipedia:Article size|shorter and more readable]], and all the essential information remains intact. Please remember to use the "Compare Selected Versions" feature to check the differences between multiple edits before reverting positive edits. - [[User:ZakuSage|ZakuSage]] 00:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

== Stop reverting my edits ==

I have been trying to improve the article [[PlayStation Portable]], and your reverting is not helping. All you are doing is hindering things, and begging for a [[3RR]] blocking. - [[User:ZakuSage|ZakuSage]] 16:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Examples of such reverts can be seen in the following: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=PlayStation_Portable&diff=87868698&oldid=87867681] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=PlayStation_Portable&diff=88022890&oldid=87947077] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=PlayStation_Portable&diff=88222313&oldid=88222247]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=PlayStation_Portable&diff=88222141&oldid=88221858] - [[User:ZakuSage|ZakuSage]] 16:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
:Stop damaging the page and discuss your proposed edits first and quit being a dick. [[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 16:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
::Why don't you explain what exactly you take issue with rather than removing good faith and mostly productive edits? You have just as much obligation to explain your reverts as ZakuSage does to explain his edits. -- [[User:Matt Britt|mattb]] <code>@ 2006-11-16T16:17Z</code>

:::Please read and understand [[WP:NPA]] if you want to avoid being blocked for disruption. -- [[User:Matt Britt|mattb]] <code>@ 2006-11-16T16:20Z</code>

== PS3 ==
If you had looked at the History of the page you would have seen an edit made by me emediatly after my edit. reverting my version to last version by a Bot. [[User:London UK|London UK]] 16:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

== User notice: temporary 3RR block ==

<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;">

agreed. However the reason u gave for deleting it was wrong. --[[User:Guzman ramirez|Guzman ramirez]] 01:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

==Regarding reversions[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Beit_Hanoun_November_2006_incident_&action=history] made on [[November 16]] [[2006]] to [[Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident ]]==
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Octagon-warning.svg|left|30px| ]]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div><!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User:RunedChozo&action=edit&section=new block] is 24 hours.

The [[WP:NPA]] don't help either.

[[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 17:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)</div>


:... and immediately went back to reverting, only minutes after this one expired. Blocked for another '''3 days'''. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 20:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

== [[Criticism of the Quran]] ==

It is a very important article and we could use your help on it. [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 02:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
:I will when I can, the POV pushers on Islamic subjects seem to like playing games around here and I'm temporarily blocked. [[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 15:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
test[[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 16:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

:I was blocked too. I lost my cool on that article for a little while. Can we perhaps petition that members of Religion X recuse themselves from decisions to block editors critical of Religion X, for all X? Also, I've proposed these guidelines [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Criticism_of_the_Qur%27an#How_we_should_work_on_this_article] for work on the article, and I've asked that people weigh in. Would you mind? [[User:Arrow740|Arrow740]] 10:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

:Arrow740, please assume good faith. do you know what your accusation means? --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 10:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
It's a good suggestion, as members of religion X (where religion X happens to be called Islam) tend to freely abuse their ability to harm other editors around here. [[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 06:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

== [[User:Mdf]] ==

This user is incivilly removing warnings from his talk page. [[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 18:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
:What you're doing is close to harassment. I suggest you stop it. There is nothing listed in [[Wikipedia:Civility]] that prevents an editor removing non-vandalism related warnings from their talk page. You have asked a user to respect [[WP:NPOV]] and once is enough. If a user is being truly uncivil, then report them to an [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]]. Since this is a clearly a point of view dispute, seek mediation or arbitration. Do not escalate tensions by badgering someone. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Netsnipe|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> &nbsp;Netsnipe&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Netsnipe|<span style="background-color:#003333; color:White">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 19:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
I have seen many instances of users being warned, and even blocked, for removing non-vandalism-related warnings, especially related to civility. In this you are mistaken. RunedChozo 19:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

== Bad faith by admin ==

{{unblock-reviewed|Block duration extends beyond all stated policy and was clearly intended by friend of POV editwarrior Mdf to be mean.|FPS is right. You started edit warring just minutes after your first block expired - that's grounds for a re-blocking, and a stronger one at that. And for the record, accusing the blocking admin of Cabalism with your opponents is pretty bad form. {{unsigned|Premeditated Chaos}}}}

:Comment: Just for the record, I'm not a friend of Mdf - in fact, I never saw either your name nor his until half an hour ago, and I have never edited Israel/Palestine related articles. In fact, also, I don't particularly like that picture in that article either. Block length includes escalation for repeat offenders. 3rd offense within a week, just minutes after the last block had expired. Escalation to 3 days seems appropriate, but reviewing admins please feel free to shorten as you see fit. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 20:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

::And if you create any further sockpuppets like {{user|Wheelygood}}, your block lengths are going to spiral, I can tell you that. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 20:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
You, sir, are a liar. I do not, have not, and will never use sockpuppets. Wheelygood is someone else entirely, and I request you apologize immediately. [[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 06:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
:[[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RunedChozo]]. '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|Daniel.Bryant]] <sup>[&nbsp;[[User talk:Daniel.Bryant|T]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Daniel.Bryant|C]]&nbsp;]</sup>''' 07:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Wheelygood isn't me, he's a friend of mine named Mark, and yes we'd have similar IPs because we're both in the math department. [[User:RunedChozo|RunedChozo]] 16:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

==Requesting unblock==
{{unblock reviewed|requesting unblock to respond to bad information and bad assumptions by admins referenced above.|decline=Unfortunately the only way you can prove your innocence now will be to relinquish your anonymity and have both yourself and Mark email [mailto:unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org] using your respective University of Houston addresses that can be verified by their staff listings, otherwise the Checkuser findings will be treated as authoritative. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Netsnipe|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> &nbsp;Netsnipe&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Netsnipe|<span style="background-color:#003333; color:White">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 18:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|No, I'm not willing to do that, as we are both students. I was mistaken to give his first name and told him that and he does not want his full name made available under any circumstances either. If you feel that it is right to persecute people, by all means, continue to do so, but you are in the wrong. Checkuser is flawed, and this is one of its failings, that and trigger happy personages like yourself.}}

Latest revision as of 10:14, 9 March 2009

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RunedChozo&oldid=276004828"