Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamsaa: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:51, 2 April 2010

Iamsaa

Iamsaa (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamsaa/Archive.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{SPIarchive notice|Iamsaa}}
-<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
-{{SPIarchive notice|Falconkhe}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}}
-===== <big>Report date March 12 2010, 10:58 (UTC)</big>=====
-{{SPIcat}}
-<!-- Please do not add a header here -->
-======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>======
-* {{checkuser|1=Asikhi}}
-<!-- Please duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->
-======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]] </span>======
-<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"        ##-->
-We appear to have another old edit warrior at the RAGS article just after the block: [[User:Asikhi]]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Riaz_Ahmed_Gohar_Shahi&action=historysubmit&diff=349396653&oldid=349396068 edit diff]. Possibly [[WP:MEAT]]? (has a wider article editing profile than the others).
-Is engaged in the same pattern of edits to RAGS and associated articles.
-Has also ''previously'' added to the other socks/meat support for the page renaming: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Younus_AlGohar&diff=prev&oldid=346694919 edit diff].
-Sorry, not sure how to turn off the checkuser bit. <b><font color="green">[[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]]</font>+<font color="blue">[[User talk:Esowteric|Talk]]</font></b> 10:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-Note to spitfire (Clerk). Okay, found AN/I: will file a report there. Many thanks. <b><font color="green">[[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]]</font>+<font color="blue">[[User talk:Esowteric|Talk]]</font></b> 11:29, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>======
-<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small>
-======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>======
-All accused parties are of the opinion that I am not being fair in singling them out. Their own grievances against the "other side" in the disputes are stated at [[Talk:Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi#Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi]] and elsewhere. <b><font color="green">[[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]]</font>+<font color="blue">[[User talk:Esowteric|Talk]]</font></b> 12:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-*'''As this new sock account was actively block evading and reverting articles from the dispute after falconkhe was blocked and after he denied having any socks at all I would say the block on this disruptive sock master should be raised to indefinite. if at some point he wants to discuss he can but after being blocked for disruptive socking he has simply socked again.''' [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 16:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-:*Agree. Also suggest keeping semi-protection. IPs and a blocked user have previously made what were construed as death threats at [[Younus AlGohar]]. See [[User talk:Stragewarior]] and follow the breadcrumbs in the article history. <b><font color="green">[[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]]</font>+<font color="blue">[[User talk:Esowteric|Talk]]</font></b> 16:45, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-::* Support, I am sure the protecting Admin would agree to that. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 16:47, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======
-{{clerknote}} any reason why this user didn't have shown up in the previous checkuser? If not then I'm inclined to lean towards suspecting this is more likely to be a friend/associate, in which case [[WP:AN/I|AN/I]] would be a more appropriate venue, [[User:Spitfire|Spitfire]]<sup>[[User talk:Spitfire|Tally-ho!]]</sup> 11:26, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-:AN/I is a page for reporting and discussing incidents on the English Wikipedia that require the intervention of administrators. Click [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&action=edit&section=new here] to open a new section. [[User:Spitfire|Spitfire]]<sup>[[User talk:Spitfire|Tally-ho!]]</sup> 11:48, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-::Many tnx, have done so. With apologies for the typo in the heading, interested parties see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User: Falconkhe and User:Asikhi]]. <b><font color="green">[[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]]</font>+<font color="blue">[[User talk:Esowteric|Talk]]</font></b> 12:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-{{RFCU|E||Self}}
-{{clerknote}} I'm going to go over your head here Spitfire, actually. Asikhi might very well have been caught by a checkuser, but nothing was reported because he had only made a dozen or so edits within the range of the checkuser, nothing in particular of which links him to Falconkhe. I am going to {{Endorse}} a checkuser here; if nothing turns up, we can evaluate for [[WP:MEAT]] violations. '''<font color="navy">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 12:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-:{{Confirmed}}. Again, unambiguous. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 16:26, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-::Indef blocked... &mdash; [[User:Scientizzle|Scien]]''[[User talk:Scientizzle|tizzle]]'' 16:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-:::By the way, indeed, this username showed up with the others, but didn't seem recently active, so I left a bit of rope. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 16:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-::::Would you mind taking a look at {{checkuser|1=Iamsaa}}? Seems likely based on history and [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Younus_AlGohar&diff=prev&oldid=346530872 recent] patterns of interactions... &mdash; [[User:Scientizzle|Scien]]''[[User talk:Scientizzle|tizzle]]'' 17:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-:::::Yeah, that one too. Not sure why I didn't add it to the list originally. Perhaps I was in a sloppy mood! --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 17:20, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-::::::Thanks...this has really cleared up a lot. I'm off to block that one, too. &mdash; [[User:Scientizzle|Scien]]''[[User talk:Scientizzle|tizzle]]'' 17:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-:::::::This is a shot in the dark. What about [[User talk:Stragewarior]]? User talk. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AStragewarior&action=historysubmit&diff=343595938&oldid=343580577 Please unblock me] "Because this is my aim of life to not spare the lier and Younus and MFI is a lie." I bring this up because edits by the user and IPs were construed as death threats. <b><font color="green">[[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]]</font>+<font color="blue">[[User talk:Esowteric|Talk]]</font></b> 17:25, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-::::::::Good eye. Same IP, same day edits as one of them. To add some ammo: any time more than one username has been on any of the IPs I've found, it's only been one from the list we've put together here (in other words, none of these are "a lot of people on the IP, and it included these ones.") --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 17:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-:::::::::What a day! Many thanks. Then falconkhe must surely be indefinitely blocked? <b><font color="green">[[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]]</font>+<font color="blue">[[User talk:Esowteric|Talk]]</font></b> 17:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-::::::::::Yes, full support. Considering all of this I would request raising of the block of the  sock master Farconkhe to indefinite. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 18:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
-----