Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamsaa: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:51, 2 April 2010

Iamsaa

Iamsaa (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamsaa/Archive.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{SPIarchive notice|Iamsaa}}
-<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
-{{SPIarchive notice|Iamsaa}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}}
-===== <big>Report date March 16 2010, 09:48 (UTC)</big>=====
-{{SPIcat}}
-<!-- Please do not add a header here -->
-======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>======
-* {{checkuser|1=Serfrosh}}
-<!-- Please duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->
-======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]] </span>======
-<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"        ##-->
-Created within an hour of the creation of sock {{user|Newatwp}} who was indefinitely blocked on 15 March 2010 at AN/I. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Newatwp:_block_evasion_.2F_threat AN/I thread].
-Only contribution thus far is to comment at the AN/RS noticeboard about a "reliable souce" proposed by another sock: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=350160175 edit diff].
-'''Final offer of help:''' Please note that {{user|Scientizzle}} has made a final offer of help to the sockmaster {{user|Iamsaa}}, if he logs in with that account, agrees to abide by rules and is willing to discuss matters. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Newatwp#Blocked talk page offer].
-Thanks, <b><font color="green">[[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]]</font>+<font color="blue">[[User talk:Esowteric|Talk]]</font></b> 09:48, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
-'''Update:''' OK, I can see that Iamsaa is negotiating to be unblocked. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Iamsaa#Blocked See here]. The accounts were created on the 12th, so this should not prejudice current negotiations. <b><font color="green">[[User:Esowteric|Esowteric]]</font>+<font color="blue">[[User talk:Esowteric|Talk]]</font></b> 09:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
-:Hm? He was also creating new accounts on the 14th; and as far as current negotiation is concerned, he's still claiming not to be (among others) [[User:Falconkhe]]. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> 20:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
-::I know... *eye roll* I've asked point-blank about this account. I'd like to see a checkuser report on this account if there's a further denial. The "negotiation" is one last suuuuper long-shot to get through to this person and stop the disruption. We'll see... &mdash; [[User:Scientizzle|Scien]]''[[User talk:Scientizzle|tizzle]]'' 20:47, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
-::Actually...can I assume, based on your block, jpgordon, that there was a check performed? The behavioral evidence is mind-numbingly obvious, so I was planning on blocking anyway. &mdash; [[User:Scientizzle|Scien]]''[[User talk:Scientizzle|tizzle]]'' 20:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
-:::Just block, ignore  and move on and continue to block  all socks. Checkuser is no longer required, new accounts are quacking like ducks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 20:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
-======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>======
-<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small>
-======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>======
-======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======
-----