Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug erwin: Difference between revisions
→[[Doug erwin]]: consensus to delete |
m moved Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Doug erwin to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug erwin: Move VfD to AfD. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Delete''' vanity. If he wants his own entry, he should set up a user page. [[User:Inky|Inky]] 01:35, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' vanity. If he wants his own entry, he should set up a user page. [[User:Inky|Inky]] 01:35, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
||
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page''' |
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''. |
||
Latest revision as of 23:49, 21 April 2010
Doug erwin was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 9 votes to delete. Postdlf 14:27, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete possibly the most unremarkable bio-stub ever. Can it be this banal and still be vanity? Apparently so. Postdlf 08:23, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Someone comes along, types there name into Wikipedia, finds no article, so creates it - ignoring the big Do not write articles about yourself statement. Average Earthman 10:45, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Doug, you do have the makings of a novelist: this page, brief as it is, exudes an air of wistfulness and nostalgia. As a 50+year-old, I can tell you there's stuff ahead of you, though. (Delete.) — Bill 12:27, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keeping that page for other people to gain an insight on what a boring life he leads would be more of a punishment for creating it than deleting it ... never-the-less, delete. Shane King 13:19, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: "The exciting world of chartered accountancy awaits you!" This reminds me a lot of that accountant in Monty Python who thinks he wants to be a lion tamer. Seems like a decent fellow, but he hasn't yet gotten to the level of encyclopedic. He also apparently has a miniscule for his surname. Geogre 14:40, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: Notable for being "the most unremarkable bio-stub ever", or just delete it. Wolfman 01:52, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- D Puh-lease ... Chris 03:08, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, clearly, and there's no reason why pages like this should have to stick around for a week or more. -R. fiend 01:55, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete vanity. If he wants his own entry, he should set up a user page. Inky 01:35, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.