Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein's Mistake: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m moved Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Einstein's Mistake to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein's Mistake: Move VfD to AfD. |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* '''Delete'''. [[User:TacoDeposit|Taco Deposit]] | [[User_talk:TacoDeposit|Talk-o Deposit]] 00:54, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC) |
* '''Delete'''. [[User:TacoDeposit|Taco Deposit]] | [[User_talk:TacoDeposit|Talk-o Deposit]] 00:54, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC) |
||
* '''D'''. [[User:Steinsky|Joe D]] 00:58, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
* '''D'''. [[User:Steinsky|Joe D]] 00:58, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
||
*Why, whatever is wrong with you people? This is a ''lovely'' article. Haha. ('''D''') [[User:Pinkfud|Pinkfud]] 02:45, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
* Delete. [[User:Postdlf|Postdlf]] 03:30, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Well, ok, I did it. I speedy deleted it, but, uh, it wasn't really a proper candidate. I wouldn't lift a finger on VfU. (I did mention that math isn't a strong suit, didn't I? I can count to 20 if I take off my shoes.) [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 03:46, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Well done'''. Not a moment too soon. Thanks for dividing this article by infinity.--[[User:NathanHawking|NathanHawking]] 08:25, 2004 Oct 17 (UTC) |
|||
*Again, what was the article's content? It might have been a BJAODN candidate. - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 12:26, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
**It might have been, but it was pretty long. I can post over the material, if you'd like, but it was a bit dull and not actually funny -- at least to me. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 13:30, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
***All right. I guess not every nonsense belongs to BJAODN, right? - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 09:00, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
The title was meant to get people's attention, not to be arrogant; I have failed. I will fix this problem. JeD |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:59, 21 April 2010
The page begins:
- Einstein defined all matter in the total universe as infinity divided by the imaginary number (i)...
Is there any need to say more? Actually, yes: this might be a candidate for speedy delete instead.
- delete -- William M. Connolley 21:06, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- speedy delete before the mirror sites pick it up. Wolfman 23:45, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- DELETE ARGH! --Asmodai 00:25, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Taco Deposit | Talk-o Deposit 00:54, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)
- D. Joe D 00:58, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Why, whatever is wrong with you people? This is a lovely article. Haha. (D) Pinkfud 02:45, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Postdlf 03:30, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Well, ok, I did it. I speedy deleted it, but, uh, it wasn't really a proper candidate. I wouldn't lift a finger on VfU. (I did mention that math isn't a strong suit, didn't I? I can count to 20 if I take off my shoes.) Geogre 03:46, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Well done. Not a moment too soon. Thanks for dividing this article by infinity.--NathanHawking 08:25, 2004 Oct 17 (UTC)
- Again, what was the article's content? It might have been a BJAODN candidate. - Mike Rosoft 12:26, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- It might have been, but it was pretty long. I can post over the material, if you'd like, but it was a bit dull and not actually funny -- at least to me. Geogre 13:30, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- All right. I guess not every nonsense belongs to BJAODN, right? - Mike Rosoft 09:00, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- It might have been, but it was pretty long. I can post over the material, if you'd like, but it was a bit dull and not actually funny -- at least to me. Geogre 13:30, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The title was meant to get people's attention, not to be arrogant; I have failed. I will fix this problem. JeD