Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa treuman: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m moved Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Melissa treuman to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa treuman: Move VfD to AfD. |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The page is really just a [[vanity page]] with no reason that the subject is particularly notable. [[User:216.102.6.176|216.102.6.176]] 20:08, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) [zll] |
The page is really just a [[vanity page]] with no reason that the subject is particularly notable. [[User:216.102.6.176|216.102.6.176]] 20:08, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) [zll] |
||
'''delete''' and I'm sure she and her husband are very nice, but doesn't appear to be noteworthy. (anon votes don't count btw) [[User:Duncharris|Dunc_Harris]]|[[User talk:duncharris|☺]] 20:09, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
* '''delete''' and I'm sure she and her husband are very nice, but doesn't appear to be noteworthy. (anon votes don't count btw) [[User:Duncharris|Dunc_Harris]]|[[User talk:duncharris|☺]] 20:09, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
||
* '''delete''' but let's wish her nonetheless, as the soon extinct page suggests, a life ''long and full of happiness and success'' --[[User:French Tourist|French Tourist]] 20:10, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
'''delete''' |
* '''delete''' (not notable) but best wishes --[[User:Cje|Cje]] 20:12, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete.''' There is also a process for candidates for rapid deletion (double bracketted {delete} ), which saves the clumsy process of voting like this. [[User:Wetman|Wetman]] 20:13, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
** comment: this article is too sane to be speedy deleted, alas.--[[User:Ianb|Ianb]] 20:14, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
''' |
*'''delete'''. How sweet. Now let's put that article on a horse-drawn carriage and let it gallop into the sunset. --[[User:Ianb|Ianb]] 20:14, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
||
*'''D'''elete, ad for JDate. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]] | [[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 20:17, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. I suspect this is someone writing an article for their significant other, much the way people name stars. It's cute, but doesn't belong here. Sorry. --[[User:Pgunn|Improv]] 20:48, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. Exceptionally saccharine, bad for your teeth, frightens small children. --[[User:Neschek|Neschek]] 21:42, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' and redirect to the [[Hallmark Channel]]. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 06:41, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
*I give them a year. I give this article about five days. '''Delete'''.[[User:Rparle| ]]—[[User:Rparle|Rory]] [[User_talk:rparle|☺]] 15:35, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. Absolutely useless, in addition: wondering who would be so idiotic as to post such detailed personal info online. [[User:Rernst|rernst]] 20:47, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:53, 22 April 2010
The page is really just a vanity page with no reason that the subject is particularly notable. 216.102.6.176 20:08, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) [zll]
- delete and I'm sure she and her husband are very nice, but doesn't appear to be noteworthy. (anon votes don't count btw) Dunc_Harris|☺ 20:09, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- delete but let's wish her nonetheless, as the soon extinct page suggests, a life long and full of happiness and success --French Tourist 20:10, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- delete (not notable) but best wishes --Cje 20:12, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. There is also a process for candidates for rapid deletion (double bracketted {delete} ), which saves the clumsy process of voting like this. Wetman 20:13, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- comment: this article is too sane to be speedy deleted, alas.--Ianb 20:14, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- delete. How sweet. Now let's put that article on a horse-drawn carriage and let it gallop into the sunset. --Ianb 20:14, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, ad for JDate. JFW | T@lk 20:17, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. I suspect this is someone writing an article for their significant other, much the way people name stars. It's cute, but doesn't belong here. Sorry. --Improv 20:48, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Exceptionally saccharine, bad for your teeth, frightens small children. --Neschek 21:42, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to the Hallmark Channel. Gamaliel 06:41, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- I give them a year. I give this article about five days. Delete. —Rory ☺ 15:35, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Absolutely useless, in addition: wondering who would be so idiotic as to post such detailed personal info online. rernst 20:47, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)