Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Accuracy disputes: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Nrcprm2026 (talk | contribs) Deciding to refrain from debate does not mean that serious debate does not exist; also, TDC is forbidden from more than 1 revert in a 24 hour period |
Scientific29 (talk | contribs) this has been cleared up - appropriate citations now present |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*[[Monosodium glutamate]] |
|||
*[[Depleted uranium]] |
*[[Depleted uranium]] |
||
*[[Uranium#Hazards]] -- see [[Talk:Uranium#Hazards]] |
|||
*[[Uranium trioxide]] |
*[[Uranium trioxide]] |
||
*[[noble metal]] -- there have been a lot of changes made recently, principally by a single editor. On balance, I think the article is better now than before. Still, there are no web-verifiable citations that demonstrate that the scope of the list of noble-metals is correct -- just citations to books which most Wikipedians can't access. And some of the article appears to be potential [[WP:OR|original research]] I think the article could use the eyes of a few chemists or metallurgists on it. 20:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:31, 30 August 2010
- Depleted uranium
- Uranium trioxide
- noble metal -- there have been a lot of changes made recently, principally by a single editor. On balance, I think the article is better now than before. Still, there are no web-verifiable citations that demonstrate that the scope of the list of noble-metals is correct -- just citations to books which most Wikipedians can't access. And some of the article appears to be potential original research I think the article could use the eyes of a few chemists or metallurgists on it. 20:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)