Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Warren G. Harding: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Warren G. Harding: oppose |
Jujutacular (talk | contribs) closed - not promoted |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
****The crop of this image looks quite cramped. The LOC ones have some more space (although they also have some white patch in the upper left corner). --[[User:KFP|KFP]] <small>([[User talk:KFP|contact]] | [[Special:Contributions/KFP|edits]])</small> 12:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC) |
****The crop of this image looks quite cramped. The LOC ones have some more space (although they also have some white patch in the upper left corner). --[[User:KFP|KFP]] <small>([[User talk:KFP|contact]] | [[Special:Contributions/KFP|edits]])</small> 12:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
*****Ya that what i noticed about the LOC one. There are alot of White patches on the LOC one. This one looks liked someone did some restoration. [[User:Spongie555|Spongie555]] ([[User talk:Spongie555|talk]]) 04:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC) |
*****Ya that what i noticed about the LOC one. There are alot of White patches on the LOC one. This one looks liked someone did some restoration. [[User:Spongie555|Spongie555]] ([[User talk:Spongie555|talk]]) 04:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
* '''Oppose''' -- Good picture and important to articles, but I agree with the comments about [[Rule of thirds|tight cropping]] and artifacts. In my mind these issues prevent the image from being FP |
* '''Oppose''' -- Good picture and important to articles, but I agree with the comments about [[Rule of thirds|tight cropping]] and artifacts. In my mind these issues prevent the image from being FP, especially since there are so many other early century B&W portrait photographs without these problems. [[User:Scewing|Scewing]] ([[User talk:Scewing|talk]]) 01:46, 14 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --'''[[User:Jujutacular|<span style="color:#006400;">Jujutacular</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jujutacular|talk]]</sup> 08:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Latest revision as of 08:06, 15 October 2010
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2010 at 03:50:22 (UTC)
- Reason
- High Ev as its the lead image. Good image of him
- Articles in which this image appears
- Warren G. Harding, 1921 in the United States, Treaty of Bucareli
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
- Creator
- Harris & Ewing
- Support as nominator --Spongie555 (talk) 03:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment, there are some compression artifacts (particularly visible in the darker parts). Is there an uncompressed or higher quality version available? --KFP (contact | edits) 17:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- LOC has two high-resolution .tif files here. Makeemlighter (talk) 00:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- I looked at the image on that website but I still think this one is better.The one on the website looks like it needs alittle resortation Spongie555 (talk) 04:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- The crop of this image looks quite cramped. The LOC ones have some more space (although they also have some white patch in the upper left corner). --KFP (contact | edits) 12:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ya that what i noticed about the LOC one. There are alot of White patches on the LOC one. This one looks liked someone did some restoration. Spongie555 (talk) 04:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- The crop of this image looks quite cramped. The LOC ones have some more space (although they also have some white patch in the upper left corner). --KFP (contact | edits) 12:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- I looked at the image on that website but I still think this one is better.The one on the website looks like it needs alittle resortation Spongie555 (talk) 04:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- LOC has two high-resolution .tif files here. Makeemlighter (talk) 00:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Good picture and important to articles, but I agree with the comments about tight cropping and artifacts. In my mind these issues prevent the image from being FP, especially since there are so many other early century B&W portrait photographs without these problems. Scewing (talk) 01:46, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Not promoted --Jujutacular talk 08:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC)