User talk:BlueonGray: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
BlueonGray (talk | contribs) |
BlueonGray (talk | contribs) |
||
| (34 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Thanks, Fred. This is good to know. I appreciate the tips.--[[User:BlueonGray|BlueonGray]] ([[User talk:BlueonGray#top|talk]]) 23:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks, Fred. This is good to know. I appreciate the tips.--[[User:BlueonGray|BlueonGray]] ([[User talk:BlueonGray#top|talk]]) 23:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
== /* note - BLPN - Ricardo Duchesne*/ == |
|||
Hi, there is a thread [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#User:BlueonGray at the BLP noticeboard here] about a couple of detrimental edits you have made to the [[Ricardo Duchesne]] BLP. Feel free to comment there explaining your position or not as you feel but please don't add opinions and suchlike to the article. We will discuss and help you in all policy matters but you do yourself no favors by violating policies and guidelines, There are hundreds of thousand other articles you can enjoy improving and I hope you will stay and do that, thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 20:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:You are again disruptive on the article. [[User:Gun Powder Ma|Gun Powder Ma]] ([[User talk:Gun Powder Ma|talk]]) 08:43, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Hi. There is an incident in which you may have been involved: [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Ricardo Duchesne|click]]. Regards [[User:Gun Powder Ma|Gun Powder Ma]] ([[User talk:Gun Powder Ma|talk]]) 09:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::The Wikipedia entry for Ricardo Duchesne has no justification for its existence. There is good reason to believe that it was created by Duchesne himself. I have therefore nominated it for deletion. If you can provide any evidence that Duchesne meets the criteria of a notable scholar, then please do so.--[[User:BlueonGray|BlueonGray]] ([[User talk:BlueonGray#top|talk]]) 18:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
=== [[WP:Battleground]] === |
|||
It is plainly obvious that ''you'' know Duchesne and have only come to WP to disrupt the article because the two of you have had an argument in a Canadian newspaper this February: [http://www.universityaffairs.ca/a-response-to-racism-in-the-academy.aspx '''This BlueonGray] is you''' (navigate to Comments on this Article: Posted by Blue on Gray, Feb 12, 2011 5:28 PM and Apr 24, 2011 10:55 PM) and soon after the incident you registered here. Since then you have only edited the article on Duchesne, invariably in a negative manner. What you do here is a personal crusade, which is against the spirit and policy of WP. WP:Battleground: ''Wikipedia is not a place to hold grudges, import personal conflicts, carry on ideological battles''. Way to go my friend, way to go, you do all of this. [[User:Gun Powder Ma|Gun Powder Ma]] ([[User talk:Gun Powder Ma|talk]]) 22:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Does Duchesne meet the criteria in [[WP:ACADEMIC]] of noteworthiness? That is the only issue here. There is no evidence that he does. I could speculate as to who would create a Wikipedia entry for an academic non-entity, but that would be counterproductive. If you have evidence of Duchesne's noteworthiness and influence as a scholar, why not just produce it rather than resorting to [[ad hominem]] attacks?--[[User:BlueonGray|BlueonGray]] ([[User talk:BlueonGray#top|talk]]) 22:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes, he does, absolutely. There are over 30 citations by international scholars listed in Google Scholar alone, from many of the most important authorities in the field, if not close to all. He is not just noteworthy, he is even clearly above the average noteworthy. With this settled, the question mark is now behind your motives and why you have come to Wikipedia after staging repeatedly ad hominem attacks [http://www.universityaffairs.ca/a-response-to-racism-in-the-academy.aspx on Duchesne] at this Canadian newspaper: ''For the record, if anyone is turned off by Western civilization, it is because of the arrogance and tastelessness of its self-appointed representatives like Ricardo Duchesne. Posted by Blue on Gray, Feb 12, 2011 5:28 PM''. So you are here on [[WP:battleground]]s, because of a personal feud. Pity for you. Greetings to Toronto. [[User:Gun Powder Ma|Gun Powder Ma]] ([[User talk:Gun Powder Ma|talk]]) 00:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::30 citations in total for a full professor is surprisingly low. A serious scholar with serious scholarly contributions to knowledge and a serious influence upon scholarship would have hundreds, if not thousands, of citations. 30 citations spread out over many articles is very, very unimpressive. There is nothing exceptional or outstanding here. Incidentally, are you Ricardo Duchesne?--[[User:BlueonGray|BlueonGray]] ([[User talk:BlueonGray#top|talk]]) 03:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::::No, I am not Duchesne. Unlike you I don't need to remain silent on my identity, I have nothing to hide. :-) 30 citations in peer-reviewed journals by many of the leading authorities is quite good actually. What you fail to see (or acknowledge) is that the field of historical sociology is not that big as, say, that of the history of communism. Therefore, asking for "thousands" of citations is quite pompous and misses completely about what limited field of history we are talking. Greetings to 98.142.247.157 [[User:Gun Powder Ma|Gun Powder Ma]] ([[User talk:Gun Powder Ma|talk]]) 06:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::::If you don't have anything to hide, then why not come out and say who you are? Who, other than Ricardo Duchesne, would go out of his way to defend and exaggerate a record of total and utter mediocrity other than Duchesne himself? Actually, there are quite a few historical sociologists who have been cited thousands of times. [[Charles Tilly]], [[Randall Collins]], [[Orlando Patterson]], [[Theda Skocpol]], and the late [[Giovanni Arrighi]] are all historical sociologists whose work has been cited thousands of times. Duchesne's paltry 35 citations just doesn't compare. What is pompous is to claim that some mediocrity with 35 citations has somehow influenced scholarly giants at leading universities.--[[User:BlueonGray|BlueonGray]] ([[User talk:BlueonGray#top|talk]]) 13:29, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Gun Powder Ma's comments here can be considered a form of personal attack or harrasment. He just gave away your location "toronto" and said "Pity for you". He's been blocked multiple times for attacks like these, if you need help, contact an admin or go to [[WP:ANI]] to file a complaint against GPM if he keeps baiting you like this.[[User:DÜNGÁNÈ|DÜNGÁNÈ]] ([[User talk:DÜNGÁNÈ|talk]]) 17:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Thank you for the suggestion. If he persists, I will indeed report it to an admin.--[[User:BlueonGray|BlueonGray]] ([[User talk:BlueonGray#top|talk]]) 17:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::::::actually I'm going to file this at ANI myself, since he has done this before (reporting other user's real life locations and insult them). He did this to User:Intranetusa, He has gotten away with this for too long.[[User:DÜNGÁNÈ|DÜNGÁNÈ]] ([[User talk:DÜNGÁNÈ|talk]]) 17:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
==Your recent edits== |
==Your recent edits== |
||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|link=]] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button [[File:Insert-signature.png|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 12:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|link=]] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button [[File:Insert-signature.png|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 12:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
== ANI == |
|||
Hello. There is an incident where you have been involved in- see [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents]].[[User:DÜNGÁNÈ|DÜNGÁNÈ]] ([[User talk:DÜNGÁNÈ|talk]]) 18:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
calm down on the caps.(all capital letters are discouraged at ANI since it resembles shouting) And also choice of vocabulary can be significant, since some may interpret "mediocrity" as an attack on the subject, its better to use words like "unimportant", or "little known", since some editors will use that as an excuse to impose blocks.[[User:DÜNGÁNÈ|DÜNGÁNÈ]] ([[User talk:DÜNGÁNÈ|talk]]) 22:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
I am on your side and agree about Ricardo Duchense's article, but we may all get blocked if admins perceive any editor to be engaged in personal attacks. If you keep your cool then you will see this through, if all capital letters are used and attacks are thrown around, admins will get tired of reading the massive blocks of texts and block us all (GPM and us). I've seen this happen before.[[User:DÜNGÁNÈ|DÜNGÁNÈ]] ([[User talk:DÜNGÁNÈ|talk]]) 00:12, 26 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Okay, thanks for the advice. I'm new to all this, so this is very good to know.--[[User:BlueonGray|BlueonGray]] ([[User talk:BlueonGray#top|talk]]) 00:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] == |
|||
Hi. I would request you to say for the record whether you have a conflict of interest in the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Duchesne|AfD]] on [[Ricardo Duchesne]] per [[WP:COI]]. Background information with relevant links for third-party users can be found [[User talk:BlueonGray#WP:Battleground|here]]. Regards [[User:Gun Powder Ma|Gun Powder Ma]] ([[User talk:Gun Powder Ma|talk]]) 13:20, 26 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::Sure! No, I do not have a conflict of interest. But, I did want to ask you about these [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Duchesne: Conflict of Interest|revelations]]. Can you declare whether you have a conflict of interest in the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Duchesne|AfD]] for [[Ricardo Duchesne]] in light of these revelations?--[[User:BlueonGray|BlueonGray]] ([[User talk:BlueonGray#top|talk]]) 16:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:10, 11 September 2011
Welcome!
Hello, BlueonGray, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 23:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hi C. Fred. How do you flag an entry for removal on the grounds that it is about a junior prof with no accomplishments worth mentioning and was clearly created by himself for self-promotion?--BlueonGray (talk) 23:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Make sure all those allegations hold water, then you'll want to follow the instructions at WP:Proposed deletion or WP:Articles for deletion.
- You could also tag the page for speedy deletion. However, I'm looking at the page right now, and if it meets those criteria, I'll delete it. If it doesn't as an administrator, I'd decline the deletion, and you'd have to go one of the other two routes anyway. —C.Fred (talk) 23:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree that the page was created by the subject to self-promote. However, I do agree that the article had no clear assertion of significance or importance, so it was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7. Had you wanted to tag the article—or if you need to tag a similar article in the future—the tag is {{db-bio}}. —C.Fred (talk) 23:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Fred. This is good to know. I appreciate the tips.--BlueonGray (talk) 23:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)