Talk:Grumpy Old Man/GA1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 10:23, 9 June 2012

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Koopatrev (talk · contribs) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article soon (before June 4, 2012).Koopatrev (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing now. Koopatrev (talk) 08:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and Images

Prose is fine, well written
Images are of good quality and clear, they are tagged with copyright statuses and has a suitable caption on

Infobox

The writers should be listed in two lines with <br /> Done by --Gen. Quon (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

"The episode originally aired on Fox in the United States on December 11, 2011." "United States" could be linked. Done Per Wiki Manual of Style, this isn't necessary.--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

"Carter is reluctant at first (since he doesn't want to leave out a six-billion dollar company), but eventually ..." Change "doesn't" to "does not". Done by --Gen. Quon (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Link the first "Joe" you can see to "Joe Swanson" Done by --Gen. Quon (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural references

A source is needed for the first statement in that paragraph.
See this section for problems with sources. Done (change done by TBrandley (talk)) Koopatrev (talk) 06:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Production and development

Nothing wrong so far. Done

Reception

A section is needed for reviews from critics.

References

Family Guy Wiki is not a reliable source. Done (change done by Tbrandley (talk)) Koopatrev (talk) 06:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to put this on hold until these problems are solved.

This article is going to fail if no changes/improvements are to be made by June 9, 2012, 08:48 (UTC).Koopatrev (talk) 06:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final review (template)

Final review (sorry I'm over an hour late but that's ok) Koopatrev (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is well written.

Prose quality:

Follows MOS:

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable;.:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

The "cultural references" section is still lacking some sources for some statements. In source 3 you don't really see anything that says anything about the cultural references of this episode.

3. It is broad in coverage:

Major aspects:

The section for reviews from critics in the "reception" section is still missing. However there is still a part for U.S. viewers and ratings.

Focused:

4. It is written in a neutral point of view.:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars etc:

6. Includes images, where appropriate.:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

Sorry this probably has to fail, some parts are still lacking information.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
-'''I will review this article soon.'''[[User:Koopatrev|Koopatrev]] ([[User talk:Koopatrev|talk]]) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
+'''I will review this article soon (before June 4, 2012).'''[[User:Koopatrev|Koopatrev]] ([[User talk:Koopatrev|talk]]) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
+'''Reviewing now.''' [[User:Koopatrev|Koopatrev]] ([[User talk:Koopatrev|talk]]) 08:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
+===Prose and Images===
+*Prose is fine, well written
+*Images are of good quality and clear, they are tagged with copyright statuses and has a suitable caption on
+===Infobox===
+*The writers should be listed in two lines with <nowiki><br /></nowiki> {{done}} by --[[User:Gen. Quon|Gen. Quon]] ([[User talk:Gen. Quon|talk]]) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
+===Lead===
+*"The episode originally aired on [[Fox Broadcasting Company|Fox]] in the United States on December 11, 2011." "United States" could be linked. {{done}} Per [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#What_generally_should_not_be_linked|Wiki Manual of Style]], this isn't necessary.--[[User:Gen. Quon|Gen. Quon]] ([[User talk:Gen. Quon|talk]]) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
+===Plot===
+*"Carter is reluctant at first (since he doesn't want to leave out a six-billion dollar company), but eventually ..." Change "doesn't" to "does not". {{done}} by --[[User:Gen. Quon|Gen. Quon]] ([[User talk:Gen. Quon|talk]]) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
+*Link the first "Joe" you can see to "[[Joe Swanson]]" {{done}} by --[[User:Gen. Quon|Gen. Quon]] ([[User talk:Gen. Quon|talk]]) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
+===Cultural references===
+*A source is needed for the first statement in that paragraph.
+*See [[#Reception|this section]] for problems with sources. {{done}} (change done by [[User:TBrandley|TBrandley]] ([[User talk:TBrandley|talk]])) [[User:Koopatrev|Koopatrev]] ([[User talk:Koopatrev|talk]]) 06:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
+===Production and development===
+Nothing wrong so far. {{done}}
+===Reception===
+*A section is needed for reviews from critics.
+===References===
+*Family Guy Wiki is not a reliable source. {{done}} (change done by [[User:TBrandley|Tbrandley]] ([[User talk:TBrandley|talk]])) [[User:Koopatrev|Koopatrev]] ([[User talk:Koopatrev|talk]]) 06:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
+I'm going to put this '''on hold''' until these problems are solved.
+<small>This article is going to '''fail''' if no changes/improvements are to be made by June 9, 2012, 08:48 (UTC).[[User:Koopatrev|Koopatrev]] ([[User talk:Koopatrev|talk]]) 06:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)</small>
+===Final review (template)===
+:Final review (sorry I'm over an hour late but that's ok) [[User:Koopatrev|Koopatrev]] ([[User talk:Koopatrev|talk]]) 10:07, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
+'''1. It is well written.'''
+:Prose quality: {{GAList/check|yes}}
+:Follows [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MOS]]: {{GAList/check|yes}}
+'''2. It is factually accurate and [[WP:V|verifiable]];.:'''
+:References to sources: {{GAList/check|no}}
+:Citations to reliable sources, where required: {{GAList/check|yes}}
+:[[WP:NOR|No original research]]: {{GAList/check|yes}}
+:The "cultural references" section is still lacking some sources for some statements. In source [http://www.firstpost.com/topic/event/grammy-awards-joes-fiona-apple-tribute-video-1g4hw_EKvgM-51549-1.html 3] you don't really see anything that says anything about the cultural references of this episode.
+'''3. It is broad in coverage:'''
+:Major aspects: {{GAList/check|no}}
+The section for reviews from critics in the "reception" section is still missing. However there is still a part for U.S. viewers and ratings.
+:Focused: {{GAList/check|yes}}
+'''4. It is written in a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]].:'''
+:Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|yes}}
+'''5. Reasonably stable?'''
+:No edit wars etc: {{GAList/check|yes}}
+'''6. Includes [[WP:IMAGES|images]], where appropriate.:'''
+:Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]]: {{GAList/check|yes}}
+:Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|yes}}
+'''Overall''':
+:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|no}} Sorry this probably has to fail, some parts are still lacking information.