Jump to content

User talk:Jaksonmk: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
sockblock
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tmbox
==Re: Eurocreme==
| style = background: #f8eaba;
Unsourced content should not be added to articles. "Word of mouth" is not good enough as it is just a rumor. This is especially true of information that defames a person/group. If you were to find a legitimate source (e.g., BBC) that made these claims, it could stay I think. [[User:EvergreenFir|EvergreenFir]] ([[User talk:EvergreenFir|talk]]) 04:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
| image = [[Image:Sock block.svg|55px]]
:Allegations are not enough to put the information on wikipedia. Please read [[WP:SPECULATION]]. [[User:EvergreenFir|EvergreenFir]] ([[User talk:EvergreenFir|talk]]) 05:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
| text = '''''This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' as a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppet]]&#32;that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|''illegitimate'']] reasons '''is not'''. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. ~[[User:Amatulic|Amatulić]] <small>([[User talk:Amatulic#top|talk]])</small> 20:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->
}}

Latest revision as of 20:37, 30 August 2013