Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leoesb1032: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Dennis Brown (talk | contribs) |
Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) Archiving case to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leoesb1032/Archive |
||
(46 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{SPIarchive notice|Leoesb1032}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|Leoesb1032}} |
||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
=====<big>28 May 2013</big>===== |
|||
{{SPI case status|close}} |
|||
;Suspected sockpuppets |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Matthewb103}} |
|||
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> |
|||
*[http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/uc?uc=Leoesb1032 User compare report] <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> |
|||
*[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/editorinteract.html Editor interaction utility] |
|||
The account Matthewb103 was created the day after [[Talk:Centralia, Pennsylvania#RfC: should information about the fire be in its own article or remain here?|an RfC]] was created which was opposed by Leoesb1032. I did not see any concerns about this until today, when Matthewb103 placed a !vote in the RfC, then {{diff2|557212912|made an edit to Leoesb1032's user page}}, followed by an {{diff2|557215752|edit to Pope Francis' entry}} on the [[December 17]] article. The article {{la|Pope Francis}} was then {{diff2|557216305|edited a couple minutes later}} by Leoesb1032. The two overlaps (editing user page and sames subject) suggests the user forgot they were using an alternate account for the RfC, then switched back exposing the overlap. - [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 21:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
|||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
Matthewb103 is my alternate account. What's the big deal? I'm not effecting Wikipedia by incorrect facts so what does it matter anyway? [[User:Leoesb1032|Leoesb1032]] ([[User talk:Leoesb1032|talk]]) 23:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*'''comment''' if you are placing to votes with different accounts on the same RfC, then you are attempting to deceive others into thinking you are two separate people. Please also note blanking this page is not a good idea.[[w:User:Martin451|Martin'''<font style="color:#FB0">4</font><font style="color:#F00">5</font><font style="color:#F60">1</font>''']] ([[w:User talk:Martin451#top|talk]]) 23:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I didn't know, I am sorry, on one device I was signed in as one account and on the other I wasn't. What is such the big deal. I'm not vandalizing pages so why does this matter? I'm sorry and I won't do it again. Give me a break, I've only been on Wikipedia for 1 month and I haven't read over all policies yet. I truly didn't mean it. Please stop taking this so seriously against me because in the very end, none of Wikipedia editing matters. Barek, please stop attacking me with everything I do. As I said, in the end, Wikipedia isn't going to matter. Your family and friends will. Leave a message on my talk page with your feelings about this please as soon as you can. Thank you. [[User:Leoesb1032|Leoesb1032]] ([[User talk:Leoesb1032|talk]]) 23:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
|||
*{{clerknote}} This is a pretty cut and dry case. I've indef blocked Matthewb103 account and blocking Leoesb1032 for one week, which will allow time for the RFC to continue. Feel free to strike comments from both accounts. Leo, using multiple accounts is a serious problem, and doing so in an RFC or other "voting-like" environment is particularly disruptive. I'm assuming the best of faith here and chosing to only block one week. We all make mistakes, but there are consequences when your mistake is to try to deceive others and skew a discussion. It does matter, and if it happens again, it will result in a longer block, or an indef block. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] / [[User talk:Dennis Brown|2¢]] / [[Special:Contributions/Dennis_Brown|©]] / [[Special:EmailUser/Dennis Brown|@]] / <small>[[WP:WikiProject Editor Retention|Join WER]]</small> 23:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Latest revision as of 17:28, 30 January 2014
Leoesb1032
Leoesb1032 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leoesb1032/Archive.