Proof techniques: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
bit of downcasing, put category at the bottom (that's the style here). More work in downcasing needed. |
redirect to Mathematical proof per AFD |
||
(32 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
In analytical [[calculus]] (often times known as '''advanced calculus''', a specific subset of '''[[mathematical analysis]]'''), there are three important methods to determine that a given hypothesis is true or false. |
|||
==Technique #1: Deductive Proof== |
|||
Deductive proof, or [[direct proof]], is very straightforward. |
|||
Given some hypothesis: |
|||
There is a logical method to prove that the hypothesis is true through step by step operations and by using postulates, lemmas, and definitions in constructing the final conclusion. |
|||
Many mathematical hypothesis can be proven using deductive proof techniques. |
|||
'''Example''' |
|||
:<math>If\ a \in R \ge 0</math> |
|||
:<math>Prove\ </math> <math>a^2 \ge 0</math> |
|||
:'''Proof:''' |
|||
:Since <math>a \ge 0</math> then by multiplicative property of real number system, |
|||
:<math>a \star a \ge a \star 0 </math> |
|||
:<math>a^2 \ge 0 \mathcal{p}</math> |
|||
==Technique #2: Proof By Contradiction== |
|||
Given some hypothesis: |
|||
It is automatically assumed that the conclusion is wrong, and an antihypothesis must be proven. Then, deductive proof is used (stepwise operations and definitions) to reach a final conclusion. If this final conclusion contradicts the original hypothesis then it is said that the original conditions are proven to be true and correct. |
|||
More difficult mathematical hypothesis can be proved or disproved using [[proof by contradiction]] techniques. |
|||
'''Example''' |
|||
Extreme Value Theorem (Proof by contradiction): |
|||
:<math>Assume\ f(x)\ is\ UNbounded\ on\ [a,b]\ </math> |
|||
:<math>(i.e.\ there\ exists\ {x_n}\subset[a,b]\ such\ that\ f(x_n)\rightarrow\infty.)</math> |
|||
:<math>Since\ x_n\ is\ bounded,\ then\ Bolzano-Weirstrauss\ Theorem\ says:\ </math> |
|||
:<math>There\ exists\ {x_{nk}}\rightarrow C \in [a,b]</math> |
|||
:<math>such\ that\ \lim_{n \to \infty}x _{nk} \rightarrow c,\ and\ \lim_{n \to \infty}f (x _{nk}) \rightarrow \infty.</math> |
|||
:<math>Since\ f\ is\ continuous\ at\ point\ C,\ then\ f(C)\ =\ \lim_{k \to \infty}f(x_k)\ =\ \infty.</math> |
|||
:<math>Because\ x _{nk}\ is\ bounded,\ and\ f(C)\ is\ bounded,\ this\ conclusion\ is\ wrong.</math> |
|||
:<math>Therefore\ f(x)\ IS\ BOUNDED\ on\ [a,b].\ \mathcal{p}</math> |
|||
==Technique #3: Mathematical Induction== |
|||
[[Mathematical induction]] is very powerful two step process, and can only be used for the natural number <math>n\ </math> |
|||
:<math>Prove\ \sum_{k=1}^n\ 4k\ = \ 2(n+1)\ for\ all\ k\ and\ n.</math> |
|||
:<math>Step\ 1:\ Consider\ case\ k\ =\ 1.</math> |
|||
:Right hand side equals 4. |
|||
:Left hand side equals 4. |
|||
:Equation satisfied for n = 1. |
|||
:Assume equation true for some n. |
|||
:<math>Step\ 2:\ Consider\ case\ n+1.</math> |
|||
:<math>\sum_{k=1}^n\ 4k\ = \ 2(n+1)\ becomes\ \sum_{k=1}^n\ 2n(n+1)\ +\ 4(n+1) = \ 2(n+1)\ \star\ 2(n+1)(n+1+1)</math> |
|||
:Simplify left and right hand sides. |
|||
:Left hand side equals 2(n+1)(n+2) |
|||
:Right hand side equals 2(n+1)(n+2) |
|||
:Both sides are equivalent. |
|||
:Based on cases n=1 and n=n+1, mathematical induction tells us |
|||
:equation true for all k,n, in N. <math>\mathcal{p}</math> |
|||
==See Also== |
|||
# [[proof theory]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
==For Further Reference / Selected Bibliography== |
|||
# Wade, William R. ''An Introduction to Analysis.'' Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004. |
|||
[[Category:Mathematical analysis]] |
Latest revision as of 18:51, 29 June 2006
Redirect to: