Jump to content

Proof techniques: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
bit of downcasing, put category at the bottom (that's the style here). More work in downcasing needed.
redirect to Mathematical proof per AFD
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[Mathematical proof]]
In analytical [[calculus]] (often times known as '''advanced calculus''', a specific subset of '''[[mathematical analysis]]'''), there are three important methods to determine that a given hypothesis is true or false.

==Technique #1: Deductive Proof==
Deductive proof, or [[direct proof]], is very straightforward.

Given some hypothesis:
There is a logical method to prove that the hypothesis is true through step by step operations and by using postulates, lemmas, and definitions in constructing the final conclusion.

Many mathematical hypothesis can be proven using deductive proof techniques.


'''Example'''

:<math>If\ a \in R \ge 0</math>

:<math>Prove\ </math> <math>a^2 \ge 0</math>


:'''Proof:'''
:Since <math>a \ge 0</math> then by multiplicative property of real number system,
:<math>a \star a \ge a \star 0 </math>
:<math>a^2 \ge 0 \mathcal{p}</math>


==Technique #2: Proof By Contradiction==

Given some hypothesis:
It is automatically assumed that the conclusion is wrong, and an antihypothesis must be proven. Then, deductive proof is used (stepwise operations and definitions) to reach a final conclusion. If this final conclusion contradicts the original hypothesis then it is said that the original conditions are proven to be true and correct.
More difficult mathematical hypothesis can be proved or disproved using [[proof by contradiction]] techniques.


'''Example'''

Extreme Value Theorem (Proof by contradiction):

:<math>Assume\ f(x)\ is\ UNbounded\ on\ [a,b]\ </math>
:<math>(i.e.\ there\ exists\ {x_n}\subset[a,b]\ such\ that\ f(x_n)\rightarrow\infty.)</math>


:<math>Since\ x_n\ is\ bounded,\ then\ Bolzano-Weirstrauss\ Theorem\ says:\ </math>
:<math>There\ exists\ {x_{nk}}\rightarrow C \in [a,b]</math>
:<math>such\ that\ \lim_{n \to \infty}x _{nk} \rightarrow c,\ and\ \lim_{n \to \infty}f (x _{nk}) \rightarrow \infty.</math>


:<math>Since\ f\ is\ continuous\ at\ point\ C,\ then\ f(C)\ =\ \lim_{k \to \infty}f(x_k)\ =\ \infty.</math>
:<math>Because\ x _{nk}\ is\ bounded,\ and\ f(C)\ is\ bounded,\ this\ conclusion\ is\ wrong.</math>
:<math>Therefore\ f(x)\ IS\ BOUNDED\ on\ [a,b].\ \mathcal{p}</math>

==Technique #3: Mathematical Induction==

[[Mathematical induction]] is very powerful two step process, and can only be used for the natural number <math>n\ </math>


:<math>Prove\ \sum_{k=1}^n\ 4k\ = \ 2(n+1)\ for\ all\ k\ and\ n.</math>


:<math>Step\ 1:\ Consider\ case\ k\ =\ 1.</math>
:Right hand side equals 4.
:Left hand side equals 4.
:Equation satisfied for n = 1.


:Assume equation true for some n.


:<math>Step\ 2:\ Consider\ case\ n+1.</math>
:<math>\sum_{k=1}^n\ 4k\ = \ 2(n+1)\ becomes\ \sum_{k=1}^n\ 2n(n+1)\ +\ 4(n+1) = \ 2(n+1)\ \star\ 2(n+1)(n+1+1)</math>
:Simplify left and right hand sides.
:Left hand side equals 2(n+1)(n+2)
:Right hand side equals 2(n+1)(n+2)
:Both sides are equivalent.


:Based on cases n=1 and n=n+1, mathematical induction tells us
:equation true for all k,n, in N. <math>\mathcal{p}</math>

==See Also==
# [[proof theory]]
# [[Mathematical proof]]

==For Further Reference / Selected Bibliography==
# Wade, William R. ''An Introduction to Analysis.'' Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.

[[Category:Mathematical analysis]]

Latest revision as of 18:51, 29 June 2006

Redirect to: