User talk:Pioneercourthouse: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 09:37, 13 December 2014

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Walor 05:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the comments on Talk:Pioneer Courthouse Square. Please, please, please read them. --Makaristos 19:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. --Makaristos 19:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Pioneer Courthouse Square, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Makaristos 19:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will recieve. The next time you violate Wikipedia's NPOV rule by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Makaristos 21:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC) Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --Makaristos 21:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. --Makaristos 21:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation

I have placed a request at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/Pioneer Courthouse Square for this issue to be dealt with. --Makaristos 21:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've accepted the request for mediation, and even though the page is protected, stability would be better in the long run. Please visit Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-26 Pioneer Courthouse Square and state what you'd like to see happen to the page, I'll contact the other editors and hopefully the protection can be released in a stable version. Thanks! ST47Talk 23:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Pioneercourthouse

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pioneercourthouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have thought long and hard about this situation and I willing to reform myself and no longer be a burden on Wikipedia. I will only make constructive edits. However, please unblock me immediately and I will reform myself. Thank you very kindly.

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts, and as such you need to address those issues on your main accounts talk page before you will be unblocked. — Tiptoety ^talk 02:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Question for Tiptoety I am confused, I thought this was the main account's talk page. This is the one I'm aware of, anyway. Was Pioneercourthouse using a different account before this one? If so, what was it? -Pete (talk) 23:16, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pioneercourthouse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my main account and I am now addressing the issue. I am willing to be a constructive member on Wikipedia so please allow this. You are hereby warned that this is your FINAL chance to do the right thing...

Decline reason:

This is inappropriate language for an unblock request, not to mention that it is also highly inappropriate to use such threatening type of language anywhere on Wikipedia. — Cirt (talk) 03:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For the record: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pioneercourthouse -- Avi (talk) 00:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|With regards to your comments on [[:{{{1}}}]]:&#32;}}Please see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|no personal attacks]] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocks]] for disruption. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks (npa2) --> --[[User:Garywill|Walor]] 05:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
-Thank you Tedder for having common sense on this. I am prepared to reform myself and apologize to the community for the disruption I caused. I would like to have my original username back eventually. And I would like to have a REASONED discussion on why homelessness should be mentioned in the Pioneer Courthouse Square article. I understand that I have caused great disruption, however I am at the end of my rope, so to speak, and I want to end this disruption. I am willing to listen to the community's solutions for how I should make penance for the trouble I have caused. I really want to end this. Let's work together to make this happen. Instead of casting me off as a pariah, listen to me please. I don't understand why you think banning people will help solve problems. As we've seen, it just angers everyone and creates more troubles. The alternative to reasoned discussion is this stupid war we're having that I'm sure nobody is enjoying whatsoever. Thank you
+:Please read the comments on [[Talk:Pioneer Courthouse Square]]. Please, please, please read them. --[[User:Makaristos|Makaristos]] 19:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
+Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|&#32;as you did at [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. <!-- Template:Npa3 --> --[[User:Makaristos|Makaristos]] 19:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
+Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Pioneer Courthouse Square|as you did to [[Pioneer Courthouse Square]],}} you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Comment3 (third level warning) -->  --[[User:Makaristos|Makaristos]] 19:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
-Can someone please listen to me? I am ready to end this now. I need help to do so, however. I want to prove my good faith but have no other way to gain attention I fear, except by participating in this stupid war.
+[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is the '''final warning''' that you will recieve. The next time you violate Wikipedia's [[WP:NPOV|NPOV]] rule by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]],}} you ''will'' be blocked from editing Wikipedia.<!-- Template:Comment4 --> --[[User:Makaristos|Makaristos]] 21:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
+Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you are doing in [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit warring]], even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> --[[User:Makaristos|Makaristos]] 21:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)<br />
+[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] You are in danger of violating the [[Wikipedia:three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|  &#32;on [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Please cease further reverts or you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. <!-- Template:3RR4 --> --[[User:Makaristos|Makaristos]] 21:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
+==Request for mediation==
+I have placed a request at [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/Pioneer Courthouse Square]] for this issue to be dealt with. --[[User:Makaristos|Makaristos]] 21:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
+Hi! I've accepted the request for mediation, and even though the page is protected, stability would be better in the long run. Please visit [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-26 Pioneer Courthouse Square]] and state what you'd like to see happen to the page, I'll contact the other editors and hopefully the protection can be released in a stable version. Thanks! [[User:ST47|ST47]]<small>[[User talk:ST47|Talk]]</small> 23:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
+[[:Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Pioneercourthouse]]
+{{unblock reviewed|1=I have thought long and hard about this situation and I willing to reform myself and no longer be a burden on Wikipedia. I will only make constructive edits. However, please unblock me immediately and I will reform myself. Thank you very kindly.|decline=You have been blocked for [[WP:SOCK|abusing multiple accounts]], and as such you need to address those issues on your main accounts talk page before you will be unblocked. — [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 02:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)}}
+::'''Question for Tiptoety''' I am confused, I thought ''this'' was the main account's talk page. This is the one I'm aware of, anyway. Was Pioneercourthouse using a different account ''before'' this one? If so, what was it? -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 23:16, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
+{{unblock reviewed|1=This is my main account and I am now addressing the issue. I am willing to be a constructive member on Wikipedia so please allow this. You are hereby warned that this is your FINAL chance to do the right thing... |decline=This is inappropriate language for an unblock request, not to mention that it is also highly inappropriate to use such threatening type of language anywhere on Wikipedia. — '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 03:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)}}
+For the record: [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pioneercourthouse]] -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] ([[User talk:Avraham|talk]]) 00:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)