Jump to content

User talk:Resaltador: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Resaltador (talk | contribs)
highlighter
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


Recently you claimed that Arzel was stalking you. I believe I have raised this issue with the community before. Do you have evidence? Did he follow you to a group of pages? Do you know how to provide diffs? If you do, and the evidence is good, I can help you raise this issue with the wider community. I believe Arzel is already walking a fine line due to current arbitration restrictions, so any other breaches would be seen as problematic. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 20:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Recently you claimed that Arzel was stalking you. I believe I have raised this issue with the community before. Do you have evidence? Did he follow you to a group of pages? Do you know how to provide diffs? If you do, and the evidence is good, I can help you raise this issue with the wider community. I believe Arzel is already walking a fine line due to current arbitration restrictions, so any other breaches would be seen as problematic. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 20:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

== [[S. Truett Cathy]] ==

[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=S._Truett_Cathy&oldid=631628217&diff=prev "Editing now is done in violation on personal NPOV issues"]: I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

== October 2014 ==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:S. Truett Cathy]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[Wikipedia:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
Please be particularly aware that [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''.
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''{{Break}}''Contrary to what you claim, there is no agreement on the talk page about this wording. You've reverted three times and are clearly edit warring. Continue and you will be blocked. In the meantime, I will revert you, since a. the wording is not great and b. you appear to be editing against three other editors.''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
*Please see [[Talk:S._Truett_Cathy#RfC:_.22anti-gay.22.2C_again]]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:22, 23 March 2015

Resaltador the highlighter

Re: Stalking

[edit]

Recently you claimed that Arzel was stalking you. I believe I have raised this issue with the community before. Do you have evidence? Did he follow you to a group of pages? Do you know how to provide diffs? If you do, and the evidence is good, I can help you raise this issue with the wider community. I believe Arzel is already walking a fine line due to current arbitration restrictions, so any other breaches would be seen as problematic. Viriditas (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]