User talk:Resaltador: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
note |
Resaltador (talk | contribs) highlighter |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Recently you claimed that Arzel was stalking you. I believe I have raised this issue with the community before. Do you have evidence? Did he follow you to a group of pages? Do you know how to provide diffs? If you do, and the evidence is good, I can help you raise this issue with the wider community. I believe Arzel is already walking a fine line due to current arbitration restrictions, so any other breaches would be seen as problematic. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 20:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC) |
Recently you claimed that Arzel was stalking you. I believe I have raised this issue with the community before. Do you have evidence? Did he follow you to a group of pages? Do you know how to provide diffs? If you do, and the evidence is good, I can help you raise this issue with the wider community. I believe Arzel is already walking a fine line due to current arbitration restrictions, so any other breaches would be seen as problematic. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 20:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
== [[S. Truett Cathy]] == |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=S._Truett_Cathy&oldid=631628217&diff=prev "Editing now is done in violation on personal NPOV issues"]: I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== October 2014 == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:S. Truett Cathy]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[Wikipedia:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> |
|||
Please be particularly aware that [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''{{Break}}''Contrary to what you claim, there is no agreement on the talk page about this wording. You've reverted three times and are clearly edit warring. Continue and you will be blocked. In the meantime, I will revert you, since a. the wording is not great and b. you appear to be editing against three other editors.''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*Please see [[Talk:S._Truett_Cathy#RfC:_.22anti-gay.22.2C_again]]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[WP:DUCK|obvious]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/96.231.161.128 block evasion]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 17:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
|||
{{unblock|reason=Hi; How am I block evading, let alone obvious? I am not sure what you mean by that as I am or was not blocked? [[User:Resaltador|Resaltador]] ([[User talk:Resaltador#top|talk]]) 17:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)}}. |
|||
*<s>{{U|Ponyo}}, is this the IP that {{U|Dennis Brown}} blocked for two weeks? I thought as much, but wasn't sure.</s> Strike that--I see you put the link in here; I assume that the block was prompted by the battleground behavior on the same article in the same style of English. Resaltador, sheesh. You're going to have to do better than that. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::I'm sure it's an unrelated IP who just happens to share the same poor grammar, battleground behaviour and have the same interest in [[S. Truett Cathy]] and...Toyotas.--[[User:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 17:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC) --[[User:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 17:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
* The template language can be ambiguous. You were blocked. In the interim can you please try to understand that consensus was [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:S._Truett_Cathy#RfC:_.22anti-gay.22.2C_again not reached], and try to contribute in good faith when you return to editing. Just because someone (even me in another circumstance) says consensus has been reached on any one topic, that doesn't mean it has been. Especially if debate has been squelched. By the way I have no interest in Toyotas; I don't even have a drivers license. Yours, [[User:Rms125a@hotmail.com|<font color="orange">'''''Quis separabit?'''''</font>]] 18:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 23 March 2015
Resaltador the highlighter
Re: Stalking
[edit]Recently you claimed that Arzel was stalking you. I believe I have raised this issue with the community before. Do you have evidence? Did he follow you to a group of pages? Do you know how to provide diffs? If you do, and the evidence is good, I can help you raise this issue with the wider community. I believe Arzel is already walking a fine line due to current arbitration restrictions, so any other breaches would be seen as problematic. Viriditas (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)