Talk:Handstand/oldvfd: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 18:48, 24 July 2006

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept

Handstand

Dicdef, nothing else of substance. - KeithTyler 19:58, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)

If this went, cartwheel would have to go too. Both these articles could do with some more work, but I don't think it does much harm to keep them. I believe they could potentially be expanded from mere dicdefs. Keep. Lacrimosus 22:16, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Factual. Wile E. Heresiarch 13:46, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to Gymnastics or something. This doesn't merit an article. Binadot 14:33, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Redirect. Concur with Binadot. --Improv 19:13, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to Gymnastics indeed. Very good suggestion. All the basic acrobatic moves should be there with at least this much detail. Geogre 01:46, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Just plain Keep; handstands are popular among non-gymnasts, especially children here in the U.S. You also see them in anime and such from time to time. - RedWordSmith 20:16, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Went ahead and made a few changes. - RedWordSmith 20:19, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to Gymnastics. SWAdair | Talk 07:51, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep, wikipedia is not paper, breakouts are encouraged. There's probably plenty of things to write and illustrate about handstands. Kim Bruning 18:40, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep, this could be expanded. If this was a computer-related topic of equal importance it would be kept in an instance :). *Does a handstand* Thue | talk 20:08, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Keep. I expanded it a bit -- it's a fundamental skill often heard of outside of gymnastics; I think it deserves an article of its own. Mindspillage 21:36, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br >The result of the debate was - kept
-'''[[Handstand]]'''
+<big>'''[[Handstand]]'''</big>
 Dicdef, nothing else of substance. - [[User:KeithTyler|KeithTyler]] 19:58, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)
 *If this went, [[cartwheel]] would have to go too. Both these articles could do with some more work, but I don't think it does much harm to keep them. I believe they could potentially be expanded from mere dicdefs. Keep. [[User:Lacrimosus|Lacrimosus]] 22:16, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)