Talk:Sam Oldham/GA1: Difference between revisions
→GA Review: all fixed |
m Reverted edits by 64.223.247.206 (talk) to last version by Hurricanehink |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::Thanks. All fixed. [[User:Strange Passerby|Strange Passerby]] ([[User talk:Strange Passerby|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Strange Passerby|c]] • [[User:Strange Passerby/status2|status]]) 06:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC) |
::Thanks. All fixed. [[User:Strange Passerby|Strange Passerby]] ([[User talk:Strange Passerby|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Strange Passerby|c]] • [[User:Strange Passerby/status2|status]]) 06:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
Looks good, I'll pass it. [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 14:59, 10 October 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:14, 12 May 2015
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk) 03:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I was going to just add some comments, but I saw there was a GAN going on. The first thing that stood out to me was the sourcing in the lede. The lede should be a summary of the article, so anything up there doesn't need to be sourced. That said, it'd be good if the (minimal) sourced info from the lede could appear later in the article (personal life). I'm not familiar with sports athletes, but as with any person, basic biographical details are needed (such as where he was born, who were his parents, schooling, etc).
The prose is generally good.
- I feel that the first sentence of "Junior career" should be split, since it's a bit long-winded.
- "and for sweeping all seven golds on offer at the English national championships." - maybe I'm missing something, but what does "on offer" mean?
All in all looks pretty good. I won't pass it yet, but it's pretty close. --Hurricanehink (talk) 03:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. All fixed. Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 06:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Looks good, I'll pass it. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:59, 10 October 2010 (UTC)