Dominance versus overdominance: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Metzenberg (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
specific section |
||
| (36 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT [[Heterosis#Genetic basis]] |
|||
'''Dominance versus overdominance''' is a controversy that has persisted for more than a century in genetics and plant breeding. [[Inbreeding depression]] is the loss of fitness that is observed, especially in small populations, due to loss of genetic diversity. Inbred strains tend to be homozygous for recessive alleles that are mildly harmful (or produce a trait that is undesirable from the standpoint of the breeder). [[Heterosis]] or hybrid vigor is the tendency of outbred strains to exceed both inbred parents in fitness. |
|||
{{R to section}} |
|||
==Genetic basis of heterosis== |
|||
When a population is small or inbred, it tends to lose genetic diversity. Selective breeding of plants and animals, including hybridization, began long before there was an understanding of underlying scientific principles. In the early 20th century, after Mendel's laws came to be understood and accepted, geneticists undertook to explain the superior vigor of many plant hybrids. Two competing hypotheses, which are not mutually exclusive, were developed:<ref>{{cite journal| author=[[James F. Crow|Crow, James F.]] |year=1948 |journal=Genetics |title=Alternative Hypotheses of Hybrid Vigor |volume=33 |issue=5 |pages=477-487 }}</ref> |
|||
* '''Dominance hypothesis'''. The dominance hypothesis attributes the superiority of hybrids to the suppression of undesirable recessive alleles from one parent by dominant alleles from the other. It attributes the poor performance of inbred strains to loss of genetic diversity, with the strains becoming purely homozygous at many loci. The dominance hypothesis was first expressed by the geneticist [[Charles Davenport]]. |
|||
* '''Overdominance hypothesis'''. Certain combinations of alleles that can be obtained by crossing two inbred strains are advantageous in the heterozygote. The overdominance hypothesis attributes to heterozygote advantage the survival of many alleles that are recessive and harmful in homozygotes. It attributes the poor performance of inbred strains to a high percentage of these harmful recessives. |
|||
{| width="565" height="289" align="right" border="1" |
|||
|----- |
|||
! width="92" scope="row" | |
|||
| width="115" | <div align="center"><strong>Parental genotypes (homozygous) </strong></div> |
|||
| width="95" | <div align="center"><strong>Gene expression profile </strong></div> |
|||
| width="131" | <div align="center"><strong>Offspring genotype (heterozygous)</strong></div> |
|||
| width="98" | <div align="center"><strong>Gene expression profile </strong></div> |
|||
|----- |
|||
! rowspan="2" scope="row" | <span class="style1">Scenario A </span> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">AA</div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">1</div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">Aa</div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">1</div> |
|||
|----- |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">aa</div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">0</div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="right"></div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center"></div> |
|||
|----- |
|||
! colspan="5" scope="row" | <div align="center"></div> <div align="right"></div> <div align="center"></div> |
|||
|----- |
|||
! rowspan="2" scope="row" | <span class="style2">Scenario B</span> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">AA</div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">1</div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">Aa</div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">2</div> |
|||
|----- |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">aa</div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | <div align="center">0 or 1</div> |
|||
| bordercolor="#2A3F00" | || bordercolor="#2A3F00" | |
|||
|----- |
|||
| colspan="5" scope="row" | <div align="center"></div> <div align="center"> |
|||
<p align="left" class="style4"><em>Dominance hypothesis </em>. Scenario A . Less genes are under expressed in the homozygous individual. As well, gene expression in the offspring is equal to the expression of the best parent. <em>Over dominance hypothesis </em>. Scenario B . Over expression of certain genes in the homozygous. Legend 0 = low or no expression of gene A 1 = normal expression of gene A 2 = over expression of gene A]] </p> |
|||
</div> |
|||
|} |
|||
<div align="left"> The two hypotheses (dominance and overdominance) have different consequences for the [[gene expression|gene expression profile]] of the individuals. If over-dominance is the main cause for the fitness advantages of heterosis, then there should be an over-expression of certain genes in the heterozygous offspring compared to the homozygous parents. On the other hand, if dominance is the cause, then there should be fewer genes that are under-expressed in the heterozygous offspring compared to the parents. Furthermore, for any given gene, the expression should be comparable to the one observed in the best of the two parents.</div> |
|||
==Historical retrospective== |
|||
Population geneticist [[James F. Crow|James Crow]], who in his younger days believed that overdominance was a major contributor to hybrid vigor, has undertaken a retrospective review of the developing science. According to Crow, the demonstration of several cases of [[heterozygote advantage]] in Drosophila and other organisms first caused great enthusiasm for the overdominance theory among scientists studying plant hybridization. But overdominance implies that yields on an inbred strain should decrease as inbred strains are selected for the performance of their hybrid crosses, as the proportion of harmful recessives in the inbred population rises. Over the years, experimentation in plant genetics has proven that the reverse occurs, that yields increase in both the inbred strains and the hybrids, suggesting that dominance alone may be adequate to explain the superior yield of hybrids. Only a few conclusive cases of overdominance have been reported in all of genetics. Since the 1980s, as experimental evidence has mounted, the dominance theory has made a comeback. |
|||
Crow writes, "The current view ... is that the dominance hypothesis is the major explanation of inbreeding decline and the high yield of hybrids. There is little statistical evidence for contributions from overdominance and [[epistasis]]. But whether the best hybrids are getting an extra boost from overdominance or favorable epistatic contributions remains an open question."<ref>{{cite journal| author=[[James F. Crow|Crow, James F.]] |year=1998 |journal=Genetics |title=90 Years Ago: The Beginning of Hybrid Maize |volume=148 | |pages=923-928 }}</ref> |
|||
== Notes == |
|||
<div class="references-small"><references/></div> |
|||
[[Category:Genetics]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:01, 30 June 2015
Redirect to:
- To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.