User talk:Cronos1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 13:07, 23 November 2015

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:31, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

RE

Replied on my talk page. Regards, Swarm^Talk 02:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Spring

I'm attempting to improve the article and hopefully bring it to FA status at one point. Any help is appreciated. I have recently taken a lot of material from the Rachel Carson article and inserted it into the Silent Spring article to use as a starting point. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 07:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the [[Wikipedia:Help|help pages]], add a question to the [[Wikipedia:village pump|village pump]] or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- [[User:Francs2000|Francs2000]] | [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Francs2000&action=edit&section=new Talk] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] 02:31, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-== Rachel Carson ==
+== RE ==
+Replied on my talk page. Regards, [[User:Swarm|<span style='color:black'><b>Swarm</b></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:blue;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 02:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
-The assertion that the criticism of Silent Spring comes from solely from conservatives amounts to an ad hominem attack.   Conservatives is not an accurate description of the entire population who criticize it.  I changed it ''specifically'' because ''not everyone'' who criticizes it is conservative.  The discussion section makes that abundantly clear.  There are certainly ''libertarians'', for example, who criticize it, but basically, most people who are not leftists have issues with it (notice how I did not use that POV, which would be just as much an ad hominem attack as yours.)  Why can you not understand this?  The rest of the section makes it clear, specifically when it lists a group of the critics, that you can identify conservatives who criticize it, if you wish to label those specific people.  That was left, and that should be good enough. [[Special:Contributions/206.124.6.222|206.124.6.222]] ([[User talk:206.124.6.222|talk]]) 17:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
+==[[Silent Spring]]==
-I've altered it so that it mentions conservatives at the top as you feel important, but also pointed out that conservatives are not the only critics.  I hope this satisfies your needs. [[Special:Contributions/206.124.6.222|206.124.6.222]] ([[User talk:206.124.6.222|talk]]) 18:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
+I'm attempting to improve the article and hopefully bring it to FA status at one point. Any help is appreciated. I have recently taken a lot of material from the [[Rachel Carson]] article and inserted it into the Silent Spring article to use as a starting point. --[[User:Harizotoh9|Harizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Harizotoh9|talk]]) 07:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
+== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
-BTW, I spent 40 minutes thoughtfully proofreading and adding three separate edits, each with specific comments.  With one fell swoop, you removed all three with a scant and incomplete comment.  I would like to suggest more consideration in the future. [[Special:Contributions/206.124.6.222|206.124.6.222]] ([[User talk:206.124.6.222|talk]]) 18:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
+{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
-:I removed the minor edits you made because they were uneccessary, the article didn't say what you claim it said. Driessen's book is not a reliable source on Rachel Carson.[[User:Cronos1|Cronos1]] ([[User talk:Cronos1#top|talk]]) 20:02, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
+<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 -->
-::How did you determine what is a reliable source? [[Special:Contributions/206.124.6.222|206.124.6.222]] ([[User talk:206.124.6.222|talk]]) 20:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)