User talk:9258fahsflkh917fas: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 13:58, 24 November 2015

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:AffineNormDrDec.jpeg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{retired}}
+== Notification of automated file description generation ==
-== Your VOTE 2 vote at [[WP:CDA|CDA]] ==
+Your upload of [[:File:AffineNormDrDec.jpeg]] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
+This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata.  It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions [[User:Theo's Little Bot/opt-out|here]]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by [[User:Theo's Little Bot|Theo's Little Bot]] ([[User:Theo's Little Bot/opt-out|opt-out]])''  11:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
-Hi Dr Dec,
+== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
-I'm afraid you'll get a number of these, I was retired for a year an my talk was full of them. Should you decide to return...
+Hi,<br>
-Firstly, apologies for this long message! I may need a response from you directly underneath it, per (3) below.
+You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
+<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 -->
-You are receiving this message as you voted in VOTE 2 at the recent [[Wikipedia_talk:Community_de-adminship/Draft_RfC#Community_de-Adminship_.27Proposal_Finalization.27_Poll.|Community de-Adminship 'Proposal Finalization' Poll]]. Unfortunately, there is a hitch regarding the "none" vote that can theoretically affect all votes.
-'''1)''' Background of VOTE 2:
-In a working example of CDA; ater the 'discussion and polling phase' is over, if the "rule of thumb" baseline percentage for Support votes has been reached, the bureaucrats can start to decide whether to desysop an admin, based in part on the evidence of the prior debate. This 'baseline' has now been slightly-adjusted to 65% (from 70%) per VOTE 1. VOTE 2 was asking if there is a ballpark area where the community consensus is so strong, that the bureaucrats should consider desysopping 'automatically'. This 'threshold' was set at 80%, and could change pending agreement on the VOTE 2 results.
-'''This was VOTE 2;'''
-:<u>Do you prefer a 'desysop threshold' of '''80% or 90%''', or having none at all?</u>
-:As a "rule of thumb", the Bureaucrats will automatically [[WP:DESYSOP|de-sysop]] the Administrator standing under CDA if the percentage reaches this 'threshold'. Currently it is 80% (per proposal 5.4).
-:Please vote "80" or "90", or "None", giving a second preference if you have one.
-'''This is the VOTE 2 question without any ambiguity;'''
-:<u>Do you prefer a "rule of thumb" 'auto-desysop' percentage of '''80%''', '''90%''', or "'''none'''"?</u>
-:Where "none" means that there is no need for a point where the bureaucrats can automatically desysop.
-:Please vote "80" or "90", or "None", giving a second preference if you have one.
-'''2)''' What was wrong with VOTE 2?
-Since the poll, it has been suggested that ambiguity in the term "none at all" could have affected some of the votes. Consequently there has been no consensus over what percentage to settle on, or how to create a new compromise percentage. The poll results are summarised [[Wikipedia:Community_de-adminship/Pre_RfC_Summaries#Vote_2|here]].
-'''3) ''' HOW TO CLARIFY YOUR VOTE:
-'''Directly below this querying message, please can you;'''
-* Clarify what you meant if you voted "none".
-* In cases where the question was genuinely misunderstood, change your initial vote if you wish to (please explain the ambiguity, and don't forget to leave a second choice if you have one).
-* Please do nothing if you interpreted the question correctly (or just confirm this if you wish), as this query cannot be a new vote.
-I realise that many of you clarified your meaning after your initial vote, but the only realistic way to move forward is to be as inclusive as possible in this vote query. I will copy any responses from this talk page and place them at [[Wikipedia:Community_de-adminship/Pre_RfC_Summaries|CDA Summaries]] for analysis. Sorry for the inconvenience,
-[[User:Matt Lewis|Matt Lewis]] ([[User talk:Matt Lewis|talk]]) 23:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
-== The RfC on the Community de-Adminship proposal has begun ==
-[[Wikipedia:Community     de-adminship/RfC|The RfC on the  Community de-Adminship    proposal]] was  started  on the 22nd Feb, and it runs for 28 days. Please note that the   existing CDA proposal was (in the end) run as something of a working   compromise, so CDA is still largely being  floated as an idea.
-Also  note that, although the  RfC is in 'poll format' (Support, Oppose, and  Neutral, with Comments  underneath), this RfC is still essentially a  'Request for Comment'.  Currently, similar comments on CDA's value are  being made under all three polls.
-Whatever you vote, your vote  is welcome!
-Regards, [[User:Matt Lewis|Matt Lewis]] ([[User talk:Matt Lewis|talk]]) 10:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC)