User talk:OAnimosity: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→New deal for page patrollers: new section Tag: |
||
| (42 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
Hi,<br> |
|||
== Caylee's Law == |
|||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692239519 --> |
|||
== New deal for page patrollers == |
|||
there is a stub here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caylee%27s_Law. I'm going back to medieval article but I am sure that you and others could do a good job on it. Nice working with you. [[User:Mugginsx|Mugginsx]] ([[User talk:Mugginsx|talk]]) 16:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}, |
|||
== Altered speedy deletion rationale: [[:Lorean Records]] == |
|||
Hello Grim Littlez. I am just letting you know that I deleted [[:Lorean Records]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml"> '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| <sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 01:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the [[WP:Page Curation|current system we introduced in 2011]] is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group '''New Page Reviewer''' has been created. |
|||
==AfD== |
|||
Please see:[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Millice]].[[User:BigJim707|BigJim707]] ([[User talk:BigJim707|talk]]) 04:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most ''current'' experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work. |
|||
== RE: Justin Bieber == |
|||
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers|'''''New Page Reviewers''''']] and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Hello. Regarding your message on my talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKralizec%21&action=historysubmit&diff=437644312&oldid=432592639], perhaps you have me mistaken for someone else? The last [[WP:CSD|CSD]] on the [[Justin Bieber]] article was in June 2009, and that was requested by {{user|I dream of horses}}, not me. Likewise I cannot find any record of me having ever edited the article on Bieber, or anything else relating to Bieber. Regards, — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 16:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Mailing2&oldid=749223519 --> |
|||
== Siege of Pelium == |
|||
Hey, you helped me out a little while ago with [[Battle of Uxian Defile]] and I was hoping that you could help me out again with a new article I've been working on. I'm having the same problem with the article I just created called [[Siege of Pelium]], I created the source thing and I believe I did it right, yet it's still giving me that shit in the bottom.[[User:SteveMooreSmith3|SteveMooreSmith3]] ([[User talk:SteveMooreSmith3|talk]]) 19:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Thats what I did, but it does't seem to be working. I recently bought the book and was citing it directly from there. But it wasn't working so I just went online and found it there. There's still that lil bleh red thing on the bottom.[[User:SteveMooreSmith3|SteveMooreSmith3]] ([[User talk:SteveMooreSmith3|talk]]) 20:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
==Talkback== |
|||
{{talkback|Yankees10|Preston Parker|ts=06:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC)}} |
|||
'''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 06:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
==Talkback== |
|||
{{talkback|Eagles247|Preston Parker|ts=06:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)}} |
|||
'''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 06:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== CSD Help == |
|||
Hi. I noticed you were looking for some CSD guidance on [[User:TerriersFan]]'s userpage. There is a great essay on CSD at [[WP:WIHSD]] that I think covers it exactly. It should help you understand CSD better and why we use PROD and AfD. Keep in mind that Wikipedia is built on consensus. Every decision must be based in consensus. When you tag an article for CSD, you arn't making a decision by yourself. You are making a decision based on what the community has agreed as consensus to delete. So even when 1 person tags an article for CSD, it's actually a community decision. The community consensus has limited CSD to only the most obvious and unambiguous of articles for deletion. If there is any doubt whatsoever, then it is probably meant for another process. Read [[WP:WIHSD]] and let me know what you think.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 22:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== RE: == |
|||
I would also like to apologize for posting the messages that I did. I believed you to be trolling at the time. [[User:The.remoney.09|The.remoney.09]] ([[User talk:The.remoney.09|talk]]) 09:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Apology accepted. [[User:Grim Littlez|KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ]] ([[User talk:Grim Littlez#top|talk]]) 09:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
==Herpestes== |
|||
(Sounds like a disease...) I've declined your A7 as it's a system not an organisation (so far as I can see). I've prodded it. [[User:Peridon|Peridon]] ([[User talk:Peridon|talk]]) 09:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Hey, Thanks for welcome. Regarding your msg, what do you exactly mean by sign in to talkpage?[[User:Add7|Add7]] ([[User talk:Add7|talk]]) 10:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:29, 13 November 2016
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
[edit]Hi OAnimosity,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)