Jump to content

User talk:SmithBlue: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
LeeRamsey (talk | contribs)
Notification: proposed deletion of I Liq Chuan.
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Welcome.

{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|-
| [[Image:System-users.svg|none]]
| ''If you wish to leave me a message, please use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SmithBlue&action=edit&section=new "+" button] above to add your new message on the bottom. Please also remember to sign your name with four consecutive tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) at the end of your message. I will attempt to respond to your message on your discusion page.''
|-
|}
{{busy}}
{{busy}}
[[/Archive 1]]
[[/Archive 1]]
Line 12: Line 4:


== '''MINIMAL''' editing activity occuring ==
== '''MINIMAL''' editing activity occuring ==
WIki-life is very reduced at preent - hopwe to have time again in near-medium term.
WIki-life is very reduced at preent - <s>hopwe to have time again in near-medium term</s>
Please feel free to leave a message - I'll get round to it eventually. [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 04:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Please feel free to leave a message - <s>I'll get round to it eventually.</s> It could be years before I read it though.[[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 04:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC) [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 06:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

== Topic ban ==

Per my [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=711960322&oldid=711959539 closure of the ANI discussion]: You are hereby topic-banned from the topic of AIDS, broadly construed--so broadly that certainly articles like [[Brian Martin (social scientist)]] fall under it. The topic ban is indefinite and may be appealed a year from now. Thank you. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 00:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

== [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, SmithBlue. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates|the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/399|the voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/21&oldid=750582913 -->
== Proposed deletion of [[I Liq Chuan]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]]


The article [[I Liq Chuan]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
:'''Previously [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Liq Chuan|AfD]]'d article that needs to get substantially better or be deleted. Most of the sources look non-independent and the body text is very sparse.'''


While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
== Central Jersey ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:I Liq Chuan|the article's talk page]].
I'm done with trying to deal with the belligerent editor haunting [[Central Jersey]]. Let me know when the rule of law returns. --[[User:Pnoble805|Pat]] ([[User talk:Pnoble805|talk]]) 02:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
:Sorry. I thought you were the replacement Wiki editor in dispute resolution. I already filed the required report and summoned an impartial editor. That editor got nowhere, left with his apologies, and then you showed up talking about collaboration, etc. I understand that you were just passing through. I've fought the battle for months, even invoked Wiki help, but it is time to give it a rest.--[[User:Pnoble805|Pat]] ([[User talk:Pnoble805|talk]]) 01:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 07:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
=='Gatto' Recommendation==
I read ''The Underground History of American Education'' (Fortunately it was available online, as I couldn't find a print copy)during my 3rd period class, where I was a T.A. for a class of 11th and 12th graders who had failed the math portion of the [[WASL]] at least twice. Needless to say, I saw parallels. Eerie, eerie parallels. Thanks-I always knew that my mother's explanations that school prepared me for work by teaching us to follow directions while numbing our minds with dull worksheets didn't quite gel.[[User:LeeRamsey|LeeRamsey]] ([[User talk:LeeRamsey|talk]]) 05:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:42, 5 December 2016

/Archive 1 User talk:SmithBlue/Archive 1

MINIMAL editing activity occuring

[edit]

WIki-life is very reduced at preent - hopwe to have time again in near-medium term Please feel free to leave a message - I'll get round to it eventually. It could be years before I read it though.SmithBlue (talk) 04:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC) SmithBlue (talk) 06:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

[edit]

Per my closure of the ANI discussion: You are hereby topic-banned from the topic of AIDS, broadly construed--so broadly that certainly articles like Brian Martin (social scientist) fall under it. The topic ban is indefinite and may be appealed a year from now. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, SmithBlue. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I Liq Chuan

[edit]

The article I Liq Chuan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Previously AfD'd article that needs to get substantially better or be deleted. Most of the sources look non-independent and the body text is very sparse.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]