User talk:SmithBlue: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →OPV:Talk:Outside review of article lede: correct title |
Stuartyeates (talk | contribs) Notification: proposed deletion of I Liq Chuan. |
||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Welcome. |
|||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |
|||
|- |
|||
| [[Image:System-users.svg|none]] |
|||
| ''If you wish to leave me a message, please use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SmithBlue&action=edit§ion=new "+" button] above to add your new message on the bottom. Please also remember to sign your name with four consecutive tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) at the end of your message. I will attempt to respond to your message on your discusion page.'' |
|||
|- |
|||
|} |
|||
{{busy}} |
{{busy}} |
||
[[/Archive 1]] |
[[/Archive 1]] |
||
| Line 13: | Line 5: | ||
== '''MINIMAL''' editing activity occuring == |
== '''MINIMAL''' editing activity occuring == |
||
WIki-life is very reduced at preent - <s>hopwe to have time again in near-medium term</s> |
WIki-life is very reduced at preent - <s>hopwe to have time again in near-medium term</s> |
||
Please feel free to leave a message - <s>I'll get round to it eventually.</s> It could be years before I read it though.[[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 04:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC) [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) |
Please feel free to leave a message - <s>I'll get round to it eventually.</s> It could be years before I read it though.[[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 04:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC) [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 06:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
== WP - blah == |
|||
The less time I spend here the happier I am. |
|||
Good luck to you all and get out as soon as you can. Go dancing. Or play music. Meditate. Agitate. [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 05:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== '''On BLP violations''' == |
|||
If you can show verifiable content from RS that Person B, whether pro or anti vaccination, is an ice addict psychopath who owns a pedophile brothel and is a ISIS supporter, then go ahead and write the article. Just ask and I'll support you. |
|||
If you have strong feelings around vaccination and you have to misrepresent sources, use non-RS ranting blogs and OR to create an attack piece that matches your view of the subject then either you are supported by WP community standards or you not. |
|||
I do wish that it was obvious to everyone whether you are supported by WP community standards. So far you have been supported by WP community inaction. Especially the on-going inaction of administrators. [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 02:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Notice == |
|||
== Topic ban == |
|||
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
|||
Per my [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=711960322&oldid=711959539 closure of the ANI discussion]: You are hereby topic-banned from the topic of AIDS, broadly construed--so broadly that certainly articles like [[Brian Martin (social scientist)]] fall under it. The topic ban is indefinite and may be appealed a year from now. Thank you. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 00:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! == |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[pseudoscience]] and [[fringe science]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience|here]]. |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, SmithBlue. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. |
|||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
Your edits, few as they are, show a worrying tendency towards promoting fringe views, notably the refuted OPV-AIDS hypothesis. You need to be aware that this is not acceptable on Wikipedia. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 10:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
As stated already my edits do not show any such tendency. There is one single recent edit that shows my attempts to have OPV-AIDS presented inline with WP community standards. If you are convinced otherwise please initiate whatever mechanism is in place to prevent, what you mistypify as, me disrupting WP. [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 22:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates|the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/399|the voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Having stumbled across your edit at OPV-AIDS I can now understand the source of your error. I do not present Dildine's article "http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/what-really-caused-aids-epidemic", as a RS. Rather I present it as a catalyse for checking of WP:OPV-AIDS for inadvertent errors. I apologise if my intention was not clear. I have edited to make my intentions explicit on WP:OPV-AIDS/Talk. (Though the discovery of "Tools for Critical Thinking about Biology" and the variances between it and current WP:OPV-AIDS probably should be dealt with first.) Please be clearer about exactly which edits concern you in future comms - vague claims of "tendency" are not helpful. [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 00:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
* - ''Note to uninvolved admins'' - |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/21&oldid=750582913 --> |
|||
Below is the single (OPV related) post that [[User:JzG]] interpreted as "a worrying tendency towards promoting fringe views" and then posted the Arb Con warning template here and disrupted an article talk page section here[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brian_Martin_%28social_scientist%29&action=edit§ion=14]. |
|||
== Proposed deletion of [[I Liq Chuan]] == |
|||
I am disappointment that a skilled and capable admin should engage in such behavior. [[User:JzG]]'s actions on this matter look like bullying to me. And function to lower the standing of all WP administrators. I suggest that, to protect the good functioning of WP, that [[User:JzG]] is counselled to learn to recognise when emotions are over-riding sound judgement. (If you are incapable of recognising the difference between introducing an outside review of a WP article and putting it forward as a source then please discuss this with me.) [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue#top|talk]]) 22:39, 17 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[I Liq Chuan]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
== OPV AIDS hypothesis:Talk:Outside review of article lede == |
|||
:'''Previously [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Liq Chuan|AfD]]'d article that needs to get substantially better or be deleted. Most of the sources look non-independent and the body text is very sparse.''' |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
Some editors here might be interested in an outside review of the first 2 paragraphs of this article's lede. |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:I Liq Chuan|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
Short version ''' "Many factual errors are squeezed into these few words." ''' |
|||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 07:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Find the long version 1/3 the way down the page at <ref>http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/what-really-caused-aids-epidemic</ref> |
|||
Good luck and edit safely. [[User:SmithBlue|SmithBlue]] ([[User talk:SmithBlue|talk]]) 05:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 07:42, 5 December 2016
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
/Archive 1 User talk:SmithBlue/Archive 1
MINIMAL editing activity occuring
[edit]WIki-life is very reduced at preent - hopwe to have time again in near-medium term
Please feel free to leave a message - I'll get round to it eventually. It could be years before I read it though.SmithBlue (talk) 04:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC) SmithBlue (talk) 06:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Topic ban
[edit]Per my closure of the ANI discussion: You are hereby topic-banned from the topic of AIDS, broadly construed--so broadly that certainly articles like Brian Martin (social scientist) fall under it. The topic ban is indefinite and may be appealed a year from now. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, SmithBlue. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of I Liq Chuan
[edit]
The article I Liq Chuan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Previously AfD'd article that needs to get substantially better or be deleted. Most of the sources look non-independent and the body text is very sparse.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)