Jump to content

User talk:Krg353: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Caution: Not adhering to neutral point of view on Jallikattu. (TW)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 54: Line 54:


== January 2017 ==
== January 2017 ==
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles, as you did to [[Jallikattu]]. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diff: [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jallikattu&diff=760986741&oldid=760985635] It is not appropriate for us to add editorials and our general opinions to articles, as you have done in the linked edit. Content like this, where you 'set the record straight' about what you think Jallikattu is or isn't, is not suitable for inclusion. "Jallikattu is not a bull fight by any means, it is actually a bull holding or bull hugging festival..." That's purely an opinion. From the bull's perspective, it might feel like a fight regardless of what you think or how you choose to downplay it.
Hi, re your query on my talk page, and specifically [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jallikattu&diff=760986741&oldid=760985635 these changes], it is not appropriate for us to add editorials and our general opinions to articles, as you have done in the linked edit. Content like this, where you 'set the record straight' about what you think Jallikattu is or isn't, is not suitable for inclusion. "Jallikattu is not a bull fight by any means, it is actually a bull holding or bull hugging festival..." That's purely an opinion. From the bull's perspective, it might feel like a fight regardless of what you think or how you choose to downplay it.


Similarly the unsourced content about training: "The calves that are reared to become bulls are fed a rich nutritious diet so that they develop into strong and sturdy animals..." pushes the limit of neutrality, since it sounds like you are actively painting a picture that the bulls are treated very well. This may or may not be the case, but since we present a neutral point of view, *both* sides of the debate need to be presented properly.
Similarly the unsourced content about training: "The calves that are reared to become bulls are fed a rich nutritious diet so that they develop into strong and sturdy animals..." pushes the limit of neutrality, since it sounds like you are actively painting a picture that the bulls are treated very well. This may or may not be the case, but since we present a neutral point of view, *both* sides of the debate need to be presented properly.


So if PETA and other opponents are saying that the animals are sometimes force fed alcohol as part of their training, that needs to be presented. If you're not willing to provide both perspectives, that's going to be problematic. Please open a discussion on the article's talk page if you wish for this content to be reconsidered. Until then, it has been removed.''<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 05:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
So if PETA and other opponents are saying that the animals are sometimes force fed alcohol as part of their training, that needs to be presented. If you're not willing to provide both perspectives, that's going to be problematic. Please open a discussion on the article's talk page if you wish for this content to be reconsidered. Until then, it has been removed. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 05:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Talk:Jallikattu#Copyright issue?|ts=22:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)}}
Hi there, I have a question about where you got some of the content you added at [[Jallikattu]]. Thank you. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 22:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:38, 14 February 2017

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Krg353, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Krg353, good luck, and have fun. DRAGON BOOSTER 16:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

[edit]

These links may be helpful → Wikipedia:Citation needed, & Template:Citation needed and this one too, Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you have any questions you can place a {{help me}} tag on your talk page and ask question here. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER 17:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

January 2017

[edit]

Hi, re your query on my talk page, and specifically these changes, it is not appropriate for us to add editorials and our general opinions to articles, as you have done in the linked edit. Content like this, where you 'set the record straight' about what you think Jallikattu is or isn't, is not suitable for inclusion. "Jallikattu is not a bull fight by any means, it is actually a bull holding or bull hugging festival..." That's purely an opinion. From the bull's perspective, it might feel like a fight regardless of what you think or how you choose to downplay it.

Similarly the unsourced content about training: "The calves that are reared to become bulls are fed a rich nutritious diet so that they develop into strong and sturdy animals..." pushes the limit of neutrality, since it sounds like you are actively painting a picture that the bulls are treated very well. This may or may not be the case, but since we present a neutral point of view, *both* sides of the debate need to be presented properly.

So if PETA and other opponents are saying that the animals are sometimes force fed alcohol as part of their training, that needs to be presented. If you're not willing to provide both perspectives, that's going to be problematic. Please open a discussion on the article's talk page if you wish for this content to be reconsidered. Until then, it has been removed. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Krg353. You have new messages at Talk:Jallikattu#Copyright issue?.
Message added 22:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi there, I have a question about where you got some of the content you added at Jallikattu. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]