User talk:Mulugheta alula roma: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:01, 1 March 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mulugheta alula roma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I ask unblock because I'm users on wikipedia for 5 years and not used sockpuppets there will be a mistake.

Decline reason:

The combination of technical and behavioral evidence is convincing. PhilKnight (talk) 03:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{unblock reviewed|I ask unblock because I'm users on wikipedia for 5 years and not used sockpuppets there will be a mistake.|decline=The combination of technical and behavioral evidence is convincing. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 03:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC) }}
-== It's not Vandalism, Follow Wikipedia Guidelines.  ==
-Your constant undoing of the Wikipedia guideline-backed actions of Soupforone could be mistakened as Vandalism. I understand that you are upset but you must understand how Wikipedia works. Even I was upset at some point when I kept reverting with Soupforone.  Just follow the Wikipedia guidelines associated with identifying Ethnic Notable Persons. [[User:Otakrem|Otakrem]] ([[User talk:Otakrem|talk]]) 07:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)