User talk:Jacob Daniel Anderson: Difference between revisions
ClueBot NG (talk | contribs) Warning Jacob Daniel Anderson - #2 |
This appeal is now closed (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Jacob- However your belief is incorrect. I explained what is acceptable in a court room as my reason for edit. |
|||
Feel free to block me. There's only protection of Documents happening. |
|||
== July 2017 == |
== July 2017 == |
||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Adam9007|Adam9007]]. I noticed that you recently removed content from [[:Judicial interpretation]] without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Adam9007|my talk page]]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> [[User:Adam9007|Adam9007]] ([[User talk:Adam9007|talk]]) 02:33, 1 July 2017 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Adam9007|Adam9007]]. I noticed that you recently removed content from [[:Judicial interpretation]] without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Adam9007|my talk page]]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> [[User:Adam9007|Adam9007]] ([[User talk:Adam9007|talk]]) 02:33, 1 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
Line 8: | Line 12: | ||
* The following is the log entry regarding this warning: [[Judicial interpretation]] was [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Judicial+interpretation&diff=788382166&oldid=788381425 changed] by [[Special:Contributions/Jacob Daniel Anderson|Jacob Daniel Anderson]] [[User:Jacob Daniel Anderson|(u)]] [[User talk:Jacob Daniel Anderson|(t)]] ANN scored at 0.967492 on 2017-07-01T02:39:14+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 3075918 -->. |
* The following is the log entry regarding this warning: [[Judicial interpretation]] was [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Judicial+interpretation&diff=788382166&oldid=788381425 changed] by [[Special:Contributions/Jacob Daniel Anderson|Jacob Daniel Anderson]] [[User:Jacob Daniel Anderson|(u)]] [[User talk:Jacob Daniel Anderson|(t)]] ANN scored at 0.967492 on 2017-07-01T02:39:14+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 3075918 -->. |
||
Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning2 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG|talk]]) 02:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning2 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:ClueBot NG|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG|talk]]) 02:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Judicial interpretation]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:Adam9007|Adam9007]] ([[User talk:Adam9007|talk]]) 02:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Judicial interpretation]]. <!-- Template:uw-delete4 --> [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 02:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 03:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC) |
|||
{{UTRS-unblock-user|18627|Jul 01, 2017 03:12:13|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 03:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:30, 1 July 2017
Jacob- However your belief is incorrect. I explained what is acceptable in a court room as my reason for edit.
Feel free to block me. There's only protection of Documents happening.
July 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that you recently removed content from Judicial interpretation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 02:33, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Judicial interpretation. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Judicial interpretation was changed by Jacob Daniel Anderson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967492 on 2017-07-01T02:39:14+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Judicial interpretation, you may be blocked from editing. Adam9007 (talk) 02:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Judicial interpretation. Meters (talk) 02:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Materialscientist (talk) 03:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Jacob Daniel Anderson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18627 was submitted on Jul 01, 2017 03:12:13. This review is now closed.