Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Luiz Inácio da Silva: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva: oppose |
Removing Lula_-_foto_oficial05012007_edit.jpg, it has been deleted from Commons by Daphne Lantier because: per [[:c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lula - foto oficial05012007 edit |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Luiz Inácio da Silva|Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva]]=== |
===[[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Luiz Inácio da Silva|Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva]]=== |
||
[[Image:Lula - foto oficial05012007 edit.jpg|thumb|200px|'''Original''']] |
|||
;Reason:clear, encyclopedic portrait; technically excellent. An FP on Commons. |
;Reason:clear, encyclopedic portrait; technically excellent. An FP on Commons. |
||
;Proposed caption:Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is the 39th and current President of Brazil. He is also a founding member of the [[Worker's Party (Brazil)|Workers' Party]]. Elected in 2002 and re-elected in 2006 (with over 60% of the popular vote in both), he will remain Brazil's President until January 1, 2011. |
;Proposed caption:Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is the 39th and current President of Brazil. He is also a founding member of the [[Worker's Party (Brazil)|Workers' Party]]. Elected in 2002 and re-elected in 2006 (with over 60% of the popular vote in both), he will remain Brazil's President until January 1, 2011. |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Support''' per nom and above. Caption could be expanded, though.--[[User:HereToHelp|Here]][[User talk:HereToHelp|'''T''']][[User:HereToHelp|oHelp]] 16:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' per nom and above. Caption could be expanded, though.--[[User:HereToHelp|Here]][[User talk:HereToHelp|'''T''']][[User:HereToHelp|oHelp]] 16:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose'''. Strikes me as a pretty ordinary portrait, and I don't like the composition with so much building in the top half. [[User:Pstuart84|Pstuart84]] <small>[[User talk:Pstuart84|Talk]]</small> 18:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose'''. Strikes me as a pretty ordinary portrait, and I don't like the composition with so much building in the top half. [[User:Pstuart84|Pstuart84]] <small>[[User talk:Pstuart84|Talk]]</small> 18:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
**That would be easy to crop out…--[[User:HereToHelp|Here]][[User talk:HereToHelp|'''T''']][[User:HereToHelp|oHelp]] 13:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
|||
*'''Neutral'''. I would definitely support this if it was taken by a Wikimedian, and possibly if it wasn't but was released under a free license specifically for Wikipedia. But this is a government photo that is freely available independent of what we do, and while technically good it's not an especially striking composition.--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] 21:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
**It's perfectly fine on copyright issues- it's FP on commons so it far exceeds our expectations for copyright. It makes no difference whether it was made specifically for wikipedia- in fact that's a self reference and you cannot let it influence your decision --[[User:Froth|<span style="text-decoration: overline underline;">'''ffroth'''</span>]] 07:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
***I don't question the copyright. One of the criteria is "Is among Wikipedia's best work". The less Wikipedia or a Wikipedian was involved in the creation or securing of rights, the higher the quality I expect for the image itself or for its particular unique value within an article(s).--[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] 16:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Bad background for a portrait. Enc is good for the article, but this is not FP stuff. --[[User:Janke|Janke]] | [[User talk:Janke|Talk]] 10:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' A COM:FP? Why, because it's ''big?''? As an official portrait of a current politico it displays much more enc value than photographic prowess. The composition and lighting are just awful. Shot on a 1Ds too.. ''tsk..'' --[[user:MIckStephenson|<b>mikaul</b>]][[User_talk:MIckStephenson|<sup>talk</sup>]] 15:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' He's OK, but the background is distracting and gives him a [[Mary Ann Vecchio]] problem. Along with Ragesoss I might approve of this if it were a Wikipedian's, but there has to be a better official portrait available. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 06:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
{{FPCresult|Not promoted|}} [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 05:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Latest revision as of 19:44, 5 August 2017
- Reason
- clear, encyclopedic portrait; technically excellent. An FP on Commons.
- Proposed caption
- Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is the 39th and current President of Brazil. He is also a founding member of the Workers' Party. Elected in 2002 and re-elected in 2006 (with over 60% of the popular vote in both), he will remain Brazil's President until January 1, 2011.
- Articles this image appears in
- Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
- Creator
- Ricardo Stuckert / Presidência da República. Edited by Lycaon (Commons)
- Support as nominator Malachirality 04:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Commons debate. MER-C 04:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support, valueable and high quality. --Aqwis 15:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support per nom and above. Caption could be expanded, though.--HereToHelp 16:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Strikes me as a pretty ordinary portrait, and I don't like the composition with so much building in the top half. Pstuart84 Talk 18:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- That would be easy to crop out…--HereToHelp 13:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral. I would definitely support this if it was taken by a Wikimedian, and possibly if it wasn't but was released under a free license specifically for Wikipedia. But this is a government photo that is freely available independent of what we do, and while technically good it's not an especially striking composition.--ragesoss 21:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's perfectly fine on copyright issues- it's FP on commons so it far exceeds our expectations for copyright. It makes no difference whether it was made specifically for wikipedia- in fact that's a self reference and you cannot let it influence your decision --ffroth 07:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't question the copyright. One of the criteria is "Is among Wikipedia's best work". The less Wikipedia or a Wikipedian was involved in the creation or securing of rights, the higher the quality I expect for the image itself or for its particular unique value within an article(s).--ragesoss 16:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's perfectly fine on copyright issues- it's FP on commons so it far exceeds our expectations for copyright. It makes no difference whether it was made specifically for wikipedia- in fact that's a self reference and you cannot let it influence your decision --ffroth 07:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad background for a portrait. Enc is good for the article, but this is not FP stuff. --Janke | Talk 10:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose A COM:FP? Why, because it's big?? As an official portrait of a current politico it displays much more enc value than photographic prowess. The composition and lighting are just awful. Shot on a 1Ds too.. tsk.. --mikaultalk 15:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose He's OK, but the background is distracting and gives him a Mary Ann Vecchio problem. Along with Ragesoss I might approve of this if it were a Wikipedian's, but there has to be a better official portrait available. --Dhartung | Talk 06:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 05:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)