User talk:XerJoff: Difference between revisions
DuncanHill (talk | contribs) Warning |
m Substing templates: {{Unsigned}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==November 2017== |
==November 2017== |
||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]]. I |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/XerJoff|your recent contributions]] to [[:Srebrenica massacre]] have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:DuncanHill|my talk page]]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 17:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Srebrenica massacre]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Repeated vandalism can result in the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 18:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Srebrenica massacre == |
|||
Given your history of vandalism to the article, and the [[WP:SPA|single purpose nature]] of your account, I feel it is highly inappropriate of you to add a POV tag to the article. If you do have genuine concerns about the article, articulate them in a new section on the talk page, and allow a consensus to form there. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 18:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
My edits have no connection with "vandalism" - that article is heavy biased, and POV tag is necessary. Point of view is nowhere "neutral", but clearly one sided.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:XerJoff|XerJoff]] ([[User talk:XerJoff#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/XerJoff|contribs]]) 18:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:Then you need to explain your reasons for claiming that on the article talk page, with reference to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], simply saying "it is biased" while making n attempt whatsoever to explain your reasoning is not sufficient reason to put the tag on the article. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 18:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:I have raised my concerns on the [[WP:AN|Administrators' Noticeboard]]. [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 18:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
::XerJoff, unless you are specific about your concerns (and bring sources to support you), your edits and comments will inevitably be ignored. The place to discuss this is [[Talk:Srebrenica_massacre| the article talk page]]. |
|||
==Please sign your posts== |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello and [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome to Wikipedia]]. When you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]]. There are two ways to do this. Either: |
|||
# Add four [[tilde]]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or |
|||
# With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ([[File:Insert-signature.png|15px|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts]] or [[File:Signature icon.png|15px|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts]]) located above the edit window. |
|||
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. |
|||
Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tilde --> [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 18:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== November 2017 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]], as you did at [[:Srebrenica massacre]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Alex Shih|Alex Shih]] ([[User talk:Alex Shih|talk]]) 19:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock --> |
Latest revision as of 19:24, 2 December 2017
November 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Srebrenica massacre have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 17:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Srebrenica massacre. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 18:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Srebrenica massacre
[edit]Given your history of vandalism to the article, and the single purpose nature of your account, I feel it is highly inappropriate of you to add a POV tag to the article. If you do have genuine concerns about the article, articulate them in a new section on the talk page, and allow a consensus to form there. DuncanHill (talk) 18:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
My edits have no connection with "vandalism" - that article is heavy biased, and POV tag is necessary. Point of view is nowhere "neutral", but clearly one sided.— Preceding unsigned comment added by XerJoff (talk • contribs) 18:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Then you need to explain your reasons for claiming that on the article talk page, with reference to reliable sources, simply saying "it is biased" while making n attempt whatsoever to explain your reasoning is not sufficient reason to put the tag on the article. DuncanHill (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- I have raised my concerns on the Administrators' Noticeboard. DuncanHill (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- XerJoff, unless you are specific about your concerns (and bring sources to support you), your edits and comments will inevitably be ignored. The place to discuss this is the article talk page.
Please sign your posts
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
November 2017
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Alex Shih (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)