User:Jaspergeli/Atavism: Difference between revisions
Jaspergeli (talk | contribs) |
Jaspergeli (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Tubal Pregnancy with embryo.jpg|thumb|Early [[embryo]]s of various species display some ancestral features, like the [[tail]] on this human [[fetus]]. These features normally disappear in later development, but it may not happen if the [[animal]] has an atavism.]] |
[[File:Tubal Pregnancy with embryo.jpg|thumb|Early [[embryo]]s of various species display some ancestral features, like the [[tail]] on this human [[fetus]]. These features normally disappear in later development, but it may not happen if the [[animal]] has an atavism.]] |
||
In [[biology]], an '''atavism''' is a modification of a biological structure whereby an ancestral [[Trait (biological)|trait]] reappears after having been lost through [[evolution]]ary change in previous generations. Atavisms can occur in several ways; one of which is when [[gene]]s for previously existing [[phenotype|phenotypic]] features are preserved in [[DNA]], and these become expressed through a [[mutation]] that either knocks out the overriding genes for the new traits or makes the old traits override the new one. A number of traits can vary as a result of shortening of the [[prenatal development|fetal development]] of a trait ([[neoteny]]) or by prolongation of the same. In such a case, a shift in the time a trait is allowed to develop before it is fixed can bring forth an ancestral phenotype. Atavisms are often seen as [[evidence of common descent|evidence of evolution]]. |
In [[biology]], an '''atavism''' is a modification of a biological structure whereby an ancestral [[Trait (biological)|trait]] reappears after having been lost through the [[evolution]]ary change in previous generations. Atavisms can occur in several ways; one of which is when [[gene]]s for previously existing [[phenotype|phenotypic]] features are preserved in [[DNA]], and these become expressed through a [[mutation]] that either knocks out the overriding genes for the new traits or makes the old traits override the new one. A number of traits can vary as a result of shortening of the [[prenatal development|fetal development]] of a trait ([[neoteny]]) or by prolongation of the same. In such a case, a shift in the time a trait is allowed to develop before it is fixed can bring forth an ancestral phenotype. Atavisms are often seen as [[evidence of common descent|evidence of evolution]]. |
||
In [[social science]]s, atavisms describe a cultural tendency of reversion. For example, people in the modern era reverting to the ways of thinking and acting in a former time. The word ''atavism'' is derived from the [[Latin]] ''atavus''—a great-great-great-grandfather or, more generally, an ancestor. |
In [[social science]]s, atavisms describe a cultural tendency of reversion. For example, people in the modern era reverting to the ways of thinking and acting in a former time. The word ''atavism'' is derived from the [[Latin]] ''atavus''—a great-great-great-grandfather or, more generally, an ancestor. |
||
==Biology== |
== Biology == |
||
Evolutionarily, traits that have disappeared phenotypically do not necessarily disappear from an organism's DNA. The gene sequence often remains but is inactive. Such an unused gene may remain in the genome for many generations. As long as the gene remains intact, a fault in the genetic control suppressing the gene can lead to it being expressed again. Sometimes, the expression of dormant genes can be induced by artificial stimulation. |
Evolutionarily, traits that have disappeared phenotypically do not necessarily disappear from an organism's DNA. The gene sequence often remains but is inactive. Such an unused gene may remain in the genome for many generations. As long as the gene remains intact, a fault in the genetic control suppressing the gene can lead to it being expressed again. Sometimes, the expression of dormant genes can be induced by artificial stimulation. |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Other examples of observed atavisms include: |
Other examples of observed atavisms include: |
||
*Hindlimbs in [[cetacean]]s. |
* Hindlimbs in [[cetacean]]s. |
||
*Reappearance of limbs in [[limbless vertebrate]]s. |
* Reappearance of limbs in [[limbless vertebrate]]s. |
||
*Extra toes of the modern horse. |
* Extra toes of the modern horse. |
||
*Re-evolution of sexuality from parthenogenesis in [[Oribatida|orbitid mites]]. |
* Re-evolution of sexuality from parthenogenesis in [[Oribatida|orbitid mites]]. |
||
*Teeth in chickens. |
* Teeth in chickens. |
||
*[[Dewclaw]]s in dogs. |
* [[Dewclaw]]s in dogs. |
||
*Reappearance of wings on wingless stick insects and earwigs. |
* Reappearance of wings on wingless stick insects and earwigs. |
||
*Atavistic muscles in several birds and mammals such as the [[beagle]] and the [[jerboa]]. |
* Atavistic muscles in several birds and mammals such as the [[beagle]] and the [[jerboa]]. |
||
*Extra toes in [[Cavia|guinea pigs]]. |
* Extra toes in [[Cavia|guinea pigs]]. |
||
*Reemergence of sexual reproduction in the [[flowering plant]] ''[[Hieracium pilosella]]'' and the [[Crotoniidae]] family of mites. |
* Reemergence of sexual reproduction in the [[flowering plant]] ''[[Hieracium pilosella]]'' and the [[Crotoniidae]] family of mites. |
||
*Webbed feet in the adult [[axolotl]]s. |
* Webbed feet in the adult [[axolotl]]s. |
||
*[[Human vestigiality|Human tails]] (not pseudo-tails) and [[supernumerary nipples]] in humans (and other primates). |
* [[Human vestigiality|Human tails]] (not pseudo-tails) and [[supernumerary nipples]] in humans (and other primates). |
||
*[[Color blindness]] in humans. |
* [[Color blindness]] in humans. |
||
==Culture== |
== Culture == |
||
Atavism is a key term in [[Joseph Schumpeter]]'s explanation of [[World War I]] in twentieth-century [[Liberalism|liberal]] [[Europe]]. He defends the [[liberal international relations theory]]- that an international society built on commerce will avoid war because of war's destructiveness and comparative cost. His reason for World War I is termed "atavism", in which he asserts that senescent governments in Europe (those of the [[German Empire]], [[Russian Empire]], [[Ottoman Empire]], and [[Austro-Hungarian Empire]]) pulled the liberal Europe into war, and that the liberal regimes of the other continental powers did not cause it. He used this idea to say that [[liberalism]] and commerce would continue to have a soothing effect in international relations, and that war would not arise between nations which are connected by commercial ties. |
Atavism is a key term in [[Joseph Schumpeter]]'s explanation of [[World War I]] in twentieth-century [[Liberalism|liberal]] [[Europe]]. He defends the [[liberal international relations theory]]- that an international society built on commerce will avoid war because of war's destructiveness and comparative cost. His reason for World War I is termed "atavism", in which he asserts that senescent governments in Europe (those of the [[German Empire]], [[Russian Empire]], [[Ottoman Empire]], and [[Austro-Hungarian Empire]]) pulled the liberal Europe into war, and that the liberal regimes of the other continental powers did not cause it. He used this idea to say that [[liberalism]] and commerce would continue to have a soothing effect in international relations, and that war would not arise between nations which are connected by commercial ties. |
||
===Social Darwinism=== |
=== Social Darwinism === |
||
During the interval between the acceptance of [[evolution]] in the mid-1800s and the rise of the modern understanding of [[genetics]] in the early 1900s, atavism was used to account for the reappearance in an individual of a trait after several generations of absence—often called a "throw-back". The idea that atavisms could be made to accumulate by [[selective breeding]], or [[breeding back]], led to breeds such as the [[Heck cattle]]. This had been bred from ancient [[landrace]]s with selected primitive traits, in an attempt of "reviving" the [[aurochs]], an [[extinct]] species of wild [[cattle]]. The same notions of atavisms were used by [[social Darwinism|social Darwinists]], who claimed that inferior [[Race (classification of human beings)|races]] displayed atavistic traits, and represented more primitive traits than their own race. Both atavisms and [[Ernst Haeckel]]'s [[recapitulation theory]] are related [[evolutionary progress]], as development towards greater complexity and superior ability. |
During the interval between the acceptance of [[evolution]] in the mid-1800s and the rise of the modern understanding of [[genetics]] in the early 1900s, atavism was used to account for the reappearance in an individual of a trait after several generations of absence—often called a "throw-back". The idea that atavisms could be made to accumulate by [[selective breeding]], or [[breeding back]], led to breeds such as the [[Heck cattle]]. This had been bred from ancient [[landrace]]s with selected primitive traits, in an attempt of "reviving" the [[aurochs]], an [[extinct]] species of wild [[cattle]]. The same notions of atavisms were used by [[social Darwinism|social Darwinists]], who claimed that inferior [[Race (classification of human beings)|races]] displayed atavistic traits, and represented more primitive traits than their own race. Both atavisms and [[Ernst Haeckel]]'s [[recapitulation theory]] are related [[evolutionary progress]], as development towards greater complexity and superior ability. |
||
Latest revision as of 09:02, 10 March 2018
In biology, an atavism is a modification of a biological structure whereby an ancestral trait reappears after having been lost through the evolutionary change in previous generations. Atavisms can occur in several ways; one of which is when genes for previously existing phenotypic features are preserved in DNA, and these become expressed through a mutation that either knocks out the overriding genes for the new traits or makes the old traits override the new one. A number of traits can vary as a result of shortening of the fetal development of a trait (neoteny) or by prolongation of the same. In such a case, a shift in the time a trait is allowed to develop before it is fixed can bring forth an ancestral phenotype. Atavisms are often seen as evidence of evolution.
In social sciences, atavisms describe a cultural tendency of reversion. For example, people in the modern era reverting to the ways of thinking and acting in a former time. The word atavism is derived from the Latin atavus—a great-great-great-grandfather or, more generally, an ancestor.
Biology
[edit]Evolutionarily, traits that have disappeared phenotypically do not necessarily disappear from an organism's DNA. The gene sequence often remains but is inactive. Such an unused gene may remain in the genome for many generations. As long as the gene remains intact, a fault in the genetic control suppressing the gene can lead to it being expressed again. Sometimes, the expression of dormant genes can be induced by artificial stimulation.
Atavisms have been observed in humans, such as with infants born with vestigial tails (called a "coccygeal process", "coccygeal projection", or "caudal appendage"). Atavism can also be seen in humans who possess large teeth, like those of other primates. In addition, a case of "snake heart", the presence of "coronary circulation and myocardial architecture [which resemble] those of the reptilian heart", has also been reported in medical literature.
Other examples of observed atavisms include:
- Hindlimbs in cetaceans.
- Reappearance of limbs in limbless vertebrates.
- Extra toes of the modern horse.
- Re-evolution of sexuality from parthenogenesis in orbitid mites.
- Teeth in chickens.
- Dewclaws in dogs.
- Reappearance of wings on wingless stick insects and earwigs.
- Atavistic muscles in several birds and mammals such as the beagle and the jerboa.
- Extra toes in guinea pigs.
- Reemergence of sexual reproduction in the flowering plant Hieracium pilosella and the Crotoniidae family of mites.
- Webbed feet in the adult axolotls.
- Human tails (not pseudo-tails) and supernumerary nipples in humans (and other primates).
- Color blindness in humans.
Culture
[edit]Atavism is a key term in Joseph Schumpeter's explanation of World War I in twentieth-century liberal Europe. He defends the liberal international relations theory- that an international society built on commerce will avoid war because of war's destructiveness and comparative cost. His reason for World War I is termed "atavism", in which he asserts that senescent governments in Europe (those of the German Empire, Russian Empire, Ottoman Empire, and Austro-Hungarian Empire) pulled the liberal Europe into war, and that the liberal regimes of the other continental powers did not cause it. He used this idea to say that liberalism and commerce would continue to have a soothing effect in international relations, and that war would not arise between nations which are connected by commercial ties.
Social Darwinism
[edit]During the interval between the acceptance of evolution in the mid-1800s and the rise of the modern understanding of genetics in the early 1900s, atavism was used to account for the reappearance in an individual of a trait after several generations of absence—often called a "throw-back". The idea that atavisms could be made to accumulate by selective breeding, or breeding back, led to breeds such as the Heck cattle. This had been bred from ancient landraces with selected primitive traits, in an attempt of "reviving" the aurochs, an extinct species of wild cattle. The same notions of atavisms were used by social Darwinists, who claimed that inferior races displayed atavistic traits, and represented more primitive traits than their own race. Both atavisms and Ernst Haeckel's recapitulation theory are related evolutionary progress, as development towards greater complexity and superior ability.
In addition, the concept of atavism as part of an individualistic explanation of the causes of criminal deviance was popularised by the Italian criminologist Cesare Lombroso in the 1870s. He attempted to identify physical characteristics common to criminals and labeled those he found as atavistic, 'throw-back' traits that determined 'primitive' criminal behavior. His statistical evidence and the closely related idea of eugenics have long since been abandoned by the scientific community, but the concept that physical traits may affect the likelihood of criminal or unethical behavior in a person still has some scientific support.