User talk:Mariokempes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Earnings for architects. (TW) |
||
| (36 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not retired anymore, but I'm not here very often. If you leave a message, do not expect a quick reply. |
|||
==Archived Talk== |
|||
{{semi-retired}} |
|||
Yes, I possibly do think that that could be a godd possibility. But since I'm not an expert of Southern Italy, possibly contact someone like Sicilianmandolin to talk about that. Thanks for the message. |
|||
**[[User talk:Mariokempes/ Archive 1| Archive 1 (March- May 2007)]] |
|||
--[[User:Theologiae|Theologiae]] ([[User talk:Theologiae|talk]]) 14:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== ambrosian == |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692054221 --> |
|||
==Orphaned non-free image File:FieraMilano1.jpg== |
|||
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">'''[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|left|⚠|link=]]'''</span> Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:FieraMilano1.jpg]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]). |
|||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 18:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC) |
|||
thanks for your corrections in religion paragrah about Milan. Therefore the use of ambrosian in milanese church is not faclutative, but in these church neither was in use the gregorian one, nor is used today. The ambrosian is just the officially chant. I added the (requested?) links to PIEM and (If is useful) an external link to ambrosian |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Earnings for architects]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Earnings for architects]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earnings for architects]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:Rayman60|Rayman60]] ([[User talk:Rayman60|talk]]) 15:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
IMO should be interesting also tell the archibishop of Milan is a capo rito, I mean, it can change or the liturgy, unique case in western catholic church |
|||
(and may be in eastern - I asked about but I have obtained some dubitative response, in a near future I can tell some other about this specific case of oriental rite). |
|||
I should be grateful if you will have the patience to revise again the grammar ;-) |
|||
Thanks in advance |
|||
L--[[User:Lorenzo Fratti|Lorenzo Fratti]] 00:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Yay == |
|||
[[Image:Barnstar.png|25px|left]]I hereby award you a Barnstar for being as diligent as myself in reverting the vandalism of articles such as those of [[Italy]]! Congratulations. Maybe I could use one myself? :). [[User:Sicilianmandolin|Sicilianmandolin]] 01:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Thank you very much! == |
|||
I am delighted! I was recently alarmed to see that there is/was ''no article'' on [[Italian Renaissance painting]], so that is my current project. |
|||
Hope you realy enjoy your wiki editting! |
|||
--[[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] 23:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Architecture]]== |
|||
I like your rewrite of that paragraph on the industrial revolution. --[[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] 03:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Architecture]] == |
|||
I think it's fine. Now, what about the challenge over there at [[Architectural History]]. Do you feel up to it?? The page is dominated by the Taj Mahal. (Why do people do that?) Anyway, someone needs to fix it, and it might be you! I have my little painting project underway at [[Italian Renaissance painting]] and [[Italian Renaissance painting, development of themes]] and after that, if I can muster the reserve, I'm going to get stuck into various aspects of Gothic. And maybe tidy up a few painters' biographies. |
|||
Good luck! |
|||
--[[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] 08:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:OK, let's just put it on the "to be done" list for a bit. --[[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] 02:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Italian Mexicans == |
|||
How about you add that the number you put, 30,000 is the estimated number of Italians there were in Mexico when they first immigrated? Because if you put that that's the estimated number, it may mislead people into thinking that's the actual number of Italians in Mexico. And as it ismentioned in teh article, the actual amount is unknown because the cencus doesnt collect that data. -- [[User:Lancini87|Lancini87]] 02:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:You do have a point with the ''"Each of the original eight Italian communities was inhabited by around 400 individuals. If the expansion of Chipilo, Puebla, is representative of the Italian Mexican population as a whole, we might infer that in the late twentieth century there are as many as 30,000 people of Italian descent in Mexico"'', but that clearly states that the 30,000 would be the estimate of the total population (in the late 20th century) of the original eight. It doesn't mention anything about the later immigrantions of Italians, not exclusively to the original eight communities. And yes, i am an Italian Mexican myself. -- [[User:Lancini87|Lancini87]] 19:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Voting== |
|||
Ok so that evolved into a vote. Feel free to vote [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Italian_people#Famous_Italians here]. Because not much people take part in the discusion every voice is importent. [[User:M.V.E.i.|M.V.E.i.]] 21:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Your vote was counted :-)== |
|||
Since you suggested [[Oriana Fallaci]] in the first place, and she is a potential candidate to win, i decided to accept [[Maria Montessori]] as a third candidate, so your voice was counted. [[User:M.V.E.i.|M.V.E.i.]] 22:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==You are right, but...== |
|||
Pop stars make the image look cheap (and usually they create license problems). The image even more then recognizable should represent all places which the nation is known for. For example, in Russian people we have many writers and those who made the space flight, why? Those are the things they are notable lead in. Italians are the inventors of Opera, they invented classical guitar, piano, chello, violin and controbass. So it hurts the representative thing not to include musician from that era. I to havent known Strozzi before (i would offer Vivaldi or Bon Jovi, but as you can see the whole talk started from the fact that many didnt like the lack of women), but i saw that she is a singer and composer, and from that era. P.S. We write the names under the image so if someone not knows someone he could read about him. We have a really not simple thing here. We need two women, and one of them needs to be rlated to music (to cover the fact music wasn't represented). On the other one we have 3 candidates, and thats alot for one place. 4 candidates will make a whole mess. I personaly would enter Marco Polo and Vivaldi, but again, it all started from the fact that they wanted women. [[User:M.V.E.i.|M.V.E.i.]] 23:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Thank you :-)== |
|||
To work on the Italian people article is always easy, it's editors always can have an intellegent discussion and bring-out good ideas. [[User:M.V.E.i.|M.V.E.i.]] 19:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:16, 10 April 2018
I'm not retired anymore, but I'm not here very often. If you leave a message, do not expect a quick reply.
Yes, I possibly do think that that could be a godd possibility. But since I'm not an expert of Southern Italy, possibly contact someone like Sicilianmandolin to talk about that. Thanks for the message. --Theologiae (talk) 14:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FieraMilano1.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:FieraMilano1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Earnings for architects for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earnings for architects is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earnings for architects until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rayman60 (talk) 15:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)