Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Glee: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
R9tgokunks (talk | contribs) add |
→Tap Tap Glee: Closed as redirect (XFDcloser) |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''redirect''' to [[Tap Tap]]. Delete and merge isn't actually possible because of boring reasons. But consensus is to not have this article, and a redirects later merging from history if anybody is so inclined. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 18:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
===[[:Tap Tap Glee]]=== |
===[[:Tap Tap Glee]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|G}} |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}} |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} |
|||
<div class="infobox" style="width:33%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Glee}}</ul></div> |
<div class="infobox" style="width:33%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Glee}}</ul></div> |
||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|Tap Tap Glee}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Glee|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 June 19#{{anchorencode:Tap Tap Glee}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ |
:{{la|Tap Tap Glee}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Glee|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 June 19#{{anchorencode:Tap Tap Glee}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tap_Tap_Glee Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|Tap Tap Glee}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Tap Tap Glee}}) |
||
Article was previously deleted by {{user|Callanecc}} for not being notable. Article was recreated by {{user|Mayamaya7}} immediately after [[Tap Tap Revenge 2]] and [[:Template:Tap Tap series]] were nominated for deletion per the same notability issues. Previous articles [[Tap Tap Revenge 3]], [[Tap Tap Revenge 4]], [[Nine Inch Nails Revenge]], and [[Nirvana Revenge]] have all been deleted or redirected per lack of [[WP:Notability]] and [[WP:Reliable Sources]]. |
Article was previously deleted by User {{user|Callanecc}} for not being notable per a PROD nomination by User {{user|BU Rob13}}. Article was recreated by User {{user|Mayamaya7}} immediately after [[Tap Tap Revenge 2]] and [[:Template:Tap Tap series]] were nominated for deletion per the same notability issues. Previous articles [[Tap Tap Revenge 3]], [[Tap Tap Revenge 4]], [[Nine Inch Nails Revenge]], and [[Nirvana Revenge]] have all been deleted or redirected per lack of [[WP:Notability]] and [[WP:Reliable Sources]]. User {{user|Mayamaya7}} restored all of these around the same time without consensus, and they are all now back to redirects thanks to User {{user|Polyamorph}}. |
||
I also propose deleting [[Tap Tap Revenge 2]] and bundling it with this AfD. It currently has a separate AD at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Revenge 2]]. Also of note is the Tap Tap Series Template which is also up for deletion at [[Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_June_16#Template:Tap_Tap_series]]. |
|||
Edit: Apparently the user who recreated, [[User:Mayamaya7]], is an indefinitely blocked [[WP:SOCKPUPPET]]. |
|||
-[[User:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.0em 0.9em black'>''R9tgokunks''</span>]] [[User talk:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em red'>⯃</span>]] 00:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games|list of Video games-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 00:35, 19 June 2018 (UTC)</small> |
|||
::pinging {{ping|The1337gamer}}, {{ping|Czar}}, as users have participated in redirecting of related articles per failing of [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.0em 0.9em black'>''R9tgokunks''</span>]] [[User talk:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em red'>⯃</span>]] 01:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
* Any reason why this can't be merged to [[Tap Tap]]? Would seem to be a reasonable [[WP:ATD|alternative to deletion]]. Ya, I'd agree that this title doesn't have [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] as is. <span style="background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#B048B5'>czar</span>]]</span> 01:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:* '''Merge''' reliably sourced content to the respective section of its parent (series) article, [[Tap Tap]]. <span style="background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#B048B5'>czar</span>]]</span> 09:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Delete/Merge''' - Non-notable. Maybe a simple sentence in the [[Tap Tap]] article would suffice. '''[[User:Lee Vilenski|<span style="color:green">Lee Vilenski</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Lee Vilenski|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Lee Vilenski|contribs]])</sup>''' 09:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Redirect:''' to Tap Tap. '''<span style="background:#FFFF00;color:#6B8E23"> ''Nha Trang'' </span>''' <sup>[[User talk:NukeThePukes|Allons!]]</sup> 19:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Delete and merge''' with Tap Tap.--[[User:QueerFilmNerd|QueerFilmNerd]] ([[User talk:QueerFilmNerd|talk]]) 00:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{ping|NukeThePukes}}, {{ping|Czar}}, {{ping|CAPTAIN RAJU}}, {{ping|Lee Vilenski}}. I also have a separate AfD for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Revenge 2]], but i'm thinking it should be bundled with this as the issues with it are the same. I'm not clear as to how bundlign would be done in this case, though. Any thoughts on deletion/merger of that article? [[User:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.0em 0.9em black'>''R9tgokunks''</span>]] [[User talk:R9tgokunks|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em red'>⯃</span>]] 23:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
: Bundling only makes sense at the outset when the articles in the article group will not be discussed individually. It makes more sense to ping those who participated above to see the other discussion as well than to merge that discussion here when the above participants may or may not agree that its case is identical to the one under discussion. But this is all besides the point as these articles under discussion should have, reasonably, been redirected as an [[WP:ATD-R|alternative to deletion]] [[WP:BEFORE|before]] coming to AfD. <small>(not [[Help:Watchlist|watching]], please <code>{{tl|ping}}</code> as needed)</small> <span style="background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#B048B5'>czar</span>]]</span> 09:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:19, 27 June 2018
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Tap Tap. Delete and merge isn't actually possible because of boring reasons. But consensus is to not have this article, and a redirects later merging from history if anybody is so inclined. Sandstein 18:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tap Tap Glee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was previously deleted by User Callanecc (talk · contribs) for not being notable per a PROD nomination by User BU Rob13 (talk · contribs). Article was recreated by User Mayamaya7 (talk · contribs) immediately after Tap Tap Revenge 2 and Template:Tap Tap series were nominated for deletion per the same notability issues. Previous articles Tap Tap Revenge 3, Tap Tap Revenge 4, Nine Inch Nails Revenge, and Nirvana Revenge have all been deleted or redirected per lack of WP:Notability and WP:Reliable Sources. User Mayamaya7 (talk · contribs) restored all of these around the same time without consensus, and they are all now back to redirects thanks to User Polyamorph (talk · contribs).
I also propose deleting Tap Tap Revenge 2 and bundling it with this AfD. It currently has a separate AD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Revenge 2. Also of note is the Tap Tap Series Template which is also up for deletion at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_June_16#Template:Tap_Tap_series.
Edit: Apparently the user who recreated, User:Mayamaya7, is an indefinitely blocked WP:SOCKPUPPET.
-R9tgokunks ⯃ 00:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:35, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- pinging @The1337gamer:, @Czar:, as users have participated in redirecting of related articles per failing of WP:GNG. R9tgokunks ⯃ 01:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Any reason why this can't be merged to Tap Tap? Would seem to be a reasonable alternative to deletion. Ya, I'd agree that this title doesn't have significant coverage as is. czar 01:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Merge reliably sourced content to the respective section of its parent (series) article, Tap Tap. czar 09:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete/Merge - Non-notable. Maybe a simple sentence in the Tap Tap article would suffice. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect: to Tap Tap. Nha Trang Allons! 19:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and merge with Tap Tap.--QueerFilmNerd (talk) 00:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
@NukeThePukes:, @Czar:, @CAPTAIN RAJU:, @Lee Vilenski:. I also have a separate AfD for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Revenge 2, but i'm thinking it should be bundled with this as the issues with it are the same. I'm not clear as to how bundlign would be done in this case, though. Any thoughts on deletion/merger of that article? R9tgokunks ⯃ 23:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- Bundling only makes sense at the outset when the articles in the article group will not be discussed individually. It makes more sense to ping those who participated above to see the other discussion as well than to merge that discussion here when the above participants may or may not agree that its case is identical to the one under discussion. But this is all besides the point as these articles under discussion should have, reasonably, been redirected as an alternative to deletion before coming to AfD. (not watching, please
{{ping}}as needed) czar 09:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.