Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferrolens: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Antigap (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m Removing protection templates from unprotected page
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===[[:Ferrolens]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}


<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 08:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
===[[:Ferrolens]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|Ferrolens}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferrolens|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 August 2#{{anchorencode:Ferrolens}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ferrolens Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Ferrolens}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferrolens|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 August 2#{{anchorencode:Ferrolens}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ferrolens Stats]</span>)
Line 10: Line 16:
*'''Delete''' [[WP:TOOSOON]] at absolute best. (There are a few more GS results for "Ferrocell", but a sizable fraction of those are false positives.) [[User:XOR&#39;easter|XOR&#39;easter]] ([[User talk:XOR&#39;easter|talk]]) 17:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' [[WP:TOOSOON]] at absolute best. (There are a few more GS results for "Ferrocell", but a sizable fraction of those are false positives.) [[User:XOR&#39;easter|XOR&#39;easter]] ([[User talk:XOR&#39;easter|talk]]) 17:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Weak delete'''. As an alternative, the article could be renamed to Ferocell which does have greater technical and popular coverage. Looking closely though, this is something quite niche that has been highly promoted by its creators, promotion which includes this article. Without wishing to out anyone, it seems quite likely that the article is further promotional material generated by the inventors. Another possibility would be a merge (as a short mention) into [[ferrofluid]] which is the basis behind this invention. [[User:Lithopsian|Lithopsian]] ([[User talk:Lithopsian|talk]]) 19:27, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Weak delete'''. As an alternative, the article could be renamed to Ferocell which does have greater technical and popular coverage. Looking closely though, this is something quite niche that has been highly promoted by its creators, promotion which includes this article. Without wishing to out anyone, it seems quite likely that the article is further promotional material generated by the inventors. Another possibility would be a merge (as a short mention) into [[ferrofluid]] which is the basis behind this invention. [[User:Lithopsian|Lithopsian]] ([[User talk:Lithopsian|talk]]) 19:27, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as [[WP:Too soon]]. Has not yet achieved notability, with little notice in science data bases. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 22:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC).
*'''Delete, salt and Redirect''' to [[Ferrofluid]] as [[WP:Too soon]]. Has not yet achieved notability, with little notice in science data bases. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 22:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC).
*'''Keep''' Whereas this related device [[magnetic viewing film]] has a lot of science references? Yah Right!! [[User:Antigap|Antigap]] ([[User talk:Antigap|talk]]) 23:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
<s>*'''Keep''' Whereas this related device [[magnetic viewing film]] has a lot of science references? Yah Right!! [[User:Antigap|Antigap]] ([[User talk:Antigap|talk]]) 23:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Also Newsfaker you are lying. It is called also ferrocell with thousands of instances plenty enough of references (you should also count the Hele-Shaw cell references on google since the ferrocell is A TYPE Hele-Shaw CELL . MOST IMPORTANT YOUR reasoning FOR YOUR AFD is an attempt for outing [[WP:OUTING]] [[WP:PRIVACY]] [[WP:HA]] AND THEREFORE THIS PARADE OF YOURS IS IRRELEVANT AND THIS AFD OFFICIALLY INVALID AND A VALID REASON FOR AN UNDELETION REQUEST JUST IN CASE... [[User:Antigap|Antigap]] ([[User talk:Antigap|talk]]) 23:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Also Newsfaker you are lying. It is called also ferrocell with thousands of instances plenty enough of references (you should also count the [[Hele-Shaw flow|Hele-Shaw]] cell references on google since the ferrocell is A TYPE Hele-Shaw CELL . MOST IMPORTANT YOUR reasoning FOR YOUR AFD is an attempt for outing [[WP:OUTING]] [[WP:PRIVACY]] [[WP:HA]] AND THEREFORE THIS PARADE OF YOURS IS IRRELEVANT AND THIS AFD OFFICIALLY INVALID AND A VALID REASON FOR AN UNDELETION REQUEST JUST IN CASE... [[User:Antigap|Antigap]] ([[User talk:Antigap|talk]]) 23:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC) <small>— [[User:Antigap|Antigap]] ([[User talk:Antigap|talk]]&#32;• [[Special:Contributions/Antigap|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small></s>
:*[[WP:INHERIT|Notability is not inherited]], and [[WP:OUTING]] specifically permits disclosure of information other editors post on Wikipedia. The user {{np|Markoulw}} selected their own username, and also cited Markoulakis's publications in the article. —&nbsp;'''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]'''&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Newslinger|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 00:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to [[Ferrofluid#Applications]] per Lithopsian's comments. [[User:Bakazaka|Bakazaka]] ([[User talk:Bakazaka|talk]]) 00:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
**Honestly, I don't see any content worth merging. Writing from scratch would be a better approach. [[WP:UNDUE]] also applies: we're talking about a niche within a niche that has so far attracted essentially no attention in the scientific community. Nice pictures do not encyclopedia content make. [[User:XOR&#39;easter|XOR&#39;easter]] ([[User talk:XOR&#39;easter|talk]]) 00:32, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
<s>What a pathetic arguement and reasoning ha ha ha ha! So since your nick name is Newslinger I can assume that your real name is Rumpelstilzchen! ha hahaa ha! [[User:Antigap|Antigap]] ([[User talk:Antigap|talk]]) 00:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)</s>
*[[WP:NPA|Do not make personal attacks anywhere on Wikipedia]]. [[User:XOR&#39;easter|XOR&#39;easter]] ([[User talk:XOR&#39;easter|talk]]) 00:50, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': Antigap indef blocked as a sockpuppet. '''[[User:Teratix|<span style="color:#4b0082">Tera</span>]][[User talk:Teratix|<span style="color:#ff7b25">TIX</span>]]''' 01:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Weak merge''' (don't think I've ever written that before) to [[ferrofluid]]. Based on literature uptake, this is only very slightly less [[WP:TOOSOON]] than the previous issue; overall application might however justify a sentence & main publication ref in [[ferrofluid]] - thresholds for mention inside a larger topic being a lot more relaxed than for standalone articles, after all. (Trying hard not to have the author's behaviour drive me to an automatic delete. Nice going there.) --<span style="font-family:Courier">[[User:Elmidae|Elmidae]]</span> <small>([[User talk:Elmidae|talk]] · [[Special:contributions/Elmidae|contribs]])</small> 08:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to [[Ferrofluid#Applications]]. As above it's tempting because of the user's appalling behaviour to say delete. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 08:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
**I think the article creator's conduct is more than sufficient evidence that the content they generated is not trustworthy. What's the point of merging only to have to rewrite what was merged? Whether or not this topic warrants a sentence and a footnote in [[ferrofluid]] is a question we can resolve at [[Talk:ferrofluid]] after we're done here, I'd say. [[User:XOR&#39;easter|XOR&#39;easter]] ([[User talk:XOR&#39;easter|talk]]) 15:27, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' WP is not news outlet to generate coverage for novel, questionable inventions. [[WP:TOOSOON]] [[User:Graham Beards|Graham Beards]] ([[User talk:Graham Beards|talk]]) 08:30, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' hard to disagree with [[User:XOR&#39;easter|XOR&#39;easter]] here. '''[[User:Teratix|<span style="color:#4b0082">Tera</span>]][[User talk:Teratix|<span style="color:#ff7b25">TIX</span>]]''' 10:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' As a person trained in the wet sciences (biochemistry), I read this article three times, looked at the Wikilinks, and still do not have a clue what it is about, nor potential function(s). Too technical/obscure for Wikipedia despite the pretty pictures. [[User:David notMD|David notMD]] ([[User talk:David notMD|talk]]) 11:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

*'''Delete/Redirect''' under [[WP:TNT]]. Merging runs into issues with tone and [[WP:DUE]] without a significant rewrite.— [[User:Alpha3031|Alpha3031]] ([[User talk:Alpha3031|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alpha3031|c]]) 01:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 13:40, 26 August 2018

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrolens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Only 2 exact-word search results on Google Scholar, both of which are publications written by someone whose last name is very similar to the article creator's username (Markoulakis / Markoulw). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum field of magnet for context. — Newslinger talk 17:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 17:10, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:TOOSOON at absolute best. (There are a few more GS results for "Ferrocell", but a sizable fraction of those are false positives.) XOR'easter (talk) 17:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. As an alternative, the article could be renamed to Ferocell which does have greater technical and popular coverage. Looking closely though, this is something quite niche that has been highly promoted by its creators, promotion which includes this article. Without wishing to out anyone, it seems quite likely that the article is further promotional material generated by the inventors. Another possibility would be a merge (as a short mention) into ferrofluid which is the basis behind this invention. Lithopsian (talk) 19:27, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, salt and Redirect to Ferrofluid as WP:Too soon. Has not yet achieved notability, with little notice in science data bases. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]

*Keep Whereas this related device magnetic viewing film has a lot of science references? Yah Right!! Antigap (talk) 23:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC) Also Newsfaker you are lying. It is called also ferrocell with thousands of instances plenty enough of references (you should also count the Hele-Shaw cell references on google since the ferrocell is A TYPE Hele-Shaw CELL . MOST IMPORTANT YOUR reasoning FOR YOUR AFD is an attempt for outing WP:OUTING WP:PRIVACY WP:HA AND THEREFORE THIS PARADE OF YOURS IS IRRELEVANT AND THIS AFD OFFICIALLY INVALID AND A VALID REASON FOR AN UNDELETION REQUEST JUST IN CASE... Antigap (talk) 23:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC) Antigap (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

What a pathetic arguement and reasoning ha ha ha ha! So since your nick name is Newslinger I can assume that your real name is Rumpelstilzchen! ha hahaa ha! Antigap (talk) 00:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.