Jump to content

User talk:Blitzcream: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
unblock declined
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Why have I been blocked? [[User:Blitzcream|Blitzcream]] ([[User talk:Blitzcream#top|talk]]) 14:07, 18 December 2018 (UTC) | decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
==Recent edits==
*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, <u>or</u>
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Salt Bae]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and have been or will be [[Help:Reverting|reverted]].
*the block is no longer necessary because you
* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:Talk:Salt Bae|article's talk page]], and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|relevant notice boards]].
*#understand what you have been blocked for,
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Being focused on a single article also raises questions regarding [[Wikipedia:SPA]]. Please discuss how the wording could be improved instead of removing content.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> ----[[User:ZiaLater|<i style="text-shadow:#C0C0C0 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; color: ForestGreen">ZiaLater</i>]] ([[User talk:ZiaLater|<span style="color: ForestGreen">talk</span>]]) 04:31, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
*#will make useful contributions instead.


Please make an attempt to discuss the edits.----[[User:ZiaLater|<i style="text-shadow:#C0C0C0 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; color: ForestGreen">ZiaLater</i>]] ([[User talk:ZiaLater|<span style="color: ForestGreen">talk</span>]]) 17:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 14:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)}}


{{unblock reviewed | 1=How can I explain if I don't understand what I've been blocked for? [[User:Blitzcream|Blitzcream]] ([[User talk:Blitzcream#top|talk]]) 14:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC) | decline = Your block message states quite clearly that you have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. If you do not address this issue in subsequent unblock requests, your ability to edit this page may be revoked. [[User:Voice of Clam|O Still Small]] [[User talk:Voice of Clam|Voice of Clam]] (formerly Optimist on the run) 17:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)}}
== Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion ==
[[File:Peacedove.svg|60px|left]]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ----[[User:ZiaLater|<i style="text-shadow:#C0C0C0 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; color: ForestGreen">ZiaLater</i>]] ([[User talk:ZiaLater|<span style="color: ForestGreen">talk</span>]]) 17:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

== Notice of WP: ANI discussion ==
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice-->----[[User:ZiaLater|<i style="text-shadow:#C0C0C0 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em; color: ForestGreen">ZiaLater</i>]] ([[User talk:ZiaLater|<span style="color: ForestGreen">talk</span>]]) 03:51, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:56, 18 December 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blitzcream (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why have I been blocked? Blitzcream (talk) 14:07, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blitzcream (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How can I explain if I don't understand what I've been blocked for? Blitzcream (talk) 14:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your block message states quite clearly that you have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. If you do not address this issue in subsequent unblock requests, your ability to edit this page may be revoked. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 17:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.